On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Hi Dave,
>>>
>>> Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_modes.c between commit 4eab81366465
>>> ("drm/i915: extract connector update from intel_ddc_get_modes() for
>>> reuse") from Linus' tree and commit 451023dc32d4 ("drm: remove the
>>> raw_edid field from struct drm_display_info") from the drm tree.
>>
>> Ugh, both from me, sorry about that. Wasn't sure when or in what order
>> they'd go in.
>>
>>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
>>
>> I'm not quite sure what the patch below is against, but just removing
>> the reference to raw_edid from a slightly different place is the way to
>> go. Like you seem to do, so:
>>
>> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> I can also provide a patch against drm-next if needed.
>
> That applied fine, I pulled it in for tomorrow -next.
>
Is that the correct fix for both issues reported by Stephen?
- Sedat -
> Dave.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Attachment:
0001-drm-i915-Context-fixes.patch
Description: Binary data
