Linux Next

• Thread Index

• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 13 (crypto)
  • From: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 13 (crypto)
  • From: Johannes Goetzfried <Johannes.Goetzfried@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 13 (crypto)
  • From: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@xxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] x86: fix apic non-ISO code warnings
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 13 (crypto)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: asm/kvm_para.h from asm-generic (was: Re: linux-next: triage for April 19, 2012)
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: asm/kvm_para.h from asm-generic (was: Re: linux-next: triage for April 19, 2012)
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 13
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the leds tree
  • From: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the leds tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pci tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• asm/kvm_para.h from asm-generic (was: Re: linux-next: triage for April 19, 2012)
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2/2] drivers: usb: gadget: add multiple definition guards
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/2 RESEND] staging: usb: gadget: Configurable Composite Gadget depends on BLOCK
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pci tree related)
  • From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next] "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" commit
  • From: viresh kumar <viresh.kumar2@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next] "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" commit
  • From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• What is the right practice to get new code upstream( was Fwd: [patch] a simple hardware detector for latency as well as throughput ver. 0.1.0)
  • From: Luming Yu <luming.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next] "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" commit
  • From: viresh kumar <viresh.kumar2@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next] "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" commit
  • From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next] "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" commit
  • From: viresh kumar <viresh.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bluetooth tree with the wireless tree
  • From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 12
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pci tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the bluetooth tree with the wireless tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] staging/comedi: fix build for USB not enabled
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] usb: add usb.h stubs for CONFIG_USB not enabled
  • From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Fwd: [patch] a simple hardware detector for latency as well as throughput ver. 0.1.0
  • From: Luming Yu <luming.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] staging:iio:ad7298: Fix linker error due to missing IIO kfifo buffer
  • From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 2/2] drivers: usb: gadget: add multiple definition guards
  • From: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/2 RESEND] staging: usb: gadget: Configurable Composite Gadget depends on BLOCK
  • From: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/2] staging: usb: gadget: Configurable Composite Gadget depends on BLOCK
  • From: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: Tree for Jun 7 (staging/ccg #2)
  • From: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: no tree today
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: frontswap.v16 now in Linus tree, please stop pulling frontswap for linux-next
  • From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
• frontswap.v16 now in Linus tree, please stop pulling frontswap for linux-next
  • From: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] staging: comedi: das08: Reduce conditional compilation
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] staging: comedi: das08: Reduce conditional compilation
  • From: Ian Abbott <abbotti@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 8 (comedi/das08.c)
  • From: Ian Abbott <abbotti@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 8 (staging/iio)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 8 (comedi/das08.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] MFD: twl6040: Update Kconfig to avoid build breakage
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2] MFD: twl6040: Update Kconfig to avoid build breakage
  • From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] MFD: twl6040: Update Kconfig to avoid build breakage
  • From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] MFD: twl6040: Update Kconfig to avoid build breakage
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] MFD: twl6040: Update Kconfig to avoid build breakage
  • From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 8
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 7 (fs / block / rcu)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the leds tree
  • From: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the leds tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: boot problem with next-20120607
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: boot problem with next-20120607
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 7 (fs / block / rcu)
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: boot problem with next-20120607
  • From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: boot problem with next-20120607
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 7 (staging/ccg #2)
  • From: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 7 (staging/ccg #2)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 7 (fs / block / rcu)
  • From: David Brown <davidb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 7 (mfd/twl6040-irq)
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 7 (fs / block / rcu)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 7 (mfd/twl6040-irq)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 7 (staging/ccg)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: boot problem with next-20120607
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 7
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: kisskb.ellerman.id.au email notifications?
  • From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: kisskb.ellerman.id.au email notifications?
  • From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: kisskb.ellerman.id.au email notifications?
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 1 (scsi)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 5 (amd64_edac)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: radio-maxiradio.c: undefined reference to `snd_tea575x_init'
  • From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: radio-maxiradio.c: undefined reference to `snd_tea575x_init'
  • From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx>
• radio-maxiradio.c: undefined reference to `snd_tea575x_init'
  • From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
• kisskb.ellerman.id.au email notifications?
  • From: Chris Metcalf <cdmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 5 (amd64_edac)
  • From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon/sch56xx: Depend on watchdog for watchdog core functions
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 1 (scsi)
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 12
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 5 (amd64_edac)
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 5 (amd64_edac)
  • From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 5 (amd64_edac)
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 5 (amd64_edac)
  • From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 5 (amd64_edac)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: MR Swami Reddy <MR.Swami.Reddy@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: MR Swami Reddy <MR.Swami.Reddy@xxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 5
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 12
  • From: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: time to clean up your trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 12
  • From: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 12
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] acpi: fix acpi_bus.h warnings when ACPI is not enabled
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the origin tree
  • From: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Request for inclusion of ep93xx tree in linux-next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Request for inclusion of ep93xx tree in linux-next
  • From: Ryan Mallon <rmallon@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 4
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] acpi: fix acpi_bus.h warnings when ACPI is not enabled
  • From: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 1 (scsi)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the acpi tree with the hwmon-staging tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the origin tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Request to add linux-leds git tree to linux-next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: fate of the ecryptfs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: fate of the ecryptfs tree
  • From: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon/sch56xx: Depend on watchdog for watchdog core functions
  • From: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build rebase of the drivers-x86 tree
  • From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Request to add linux-leds git tree to linux-next
  • From: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon/sch56xx: Depend on watchdog for watchdog core functions
  • From: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon/sch56xx: Depend on watchdog for watchdog core functions
  • From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] s390/signal: fix compile error
  • From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] s390/signal: fix compile error
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: boot failuresfor next-20120601
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (signal tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 1
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (vfs tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build rebase of the drivers-x86 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: fate of the modem-shm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: fate of the modem-shm tree
  • From: Sjur BRENDELAND <sjur.brandeland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 31
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: fate of the ecryptfs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: fate of the bjdooks-i2c tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: fate of the fsnotify tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: fate of the modem-shm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the vhost tree with the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the drivers-x86 tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree
  • From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: triage for April 19, 2012
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [linux-next] "x86, realmode: Move ACPI wakeup to unified realmode code" commit breaks ia64
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon/sch56xx: Depend on watchdog for watchdog core functions
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] hwmon/sch56xx: Depend on watchdog for watchdog core functions
  • From: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] wlcore: fix undefined symbols when CONFIG_PM is not defined
  • From: Luciano Coelho <coelho@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2] wlcore: fix undefined symbols when CONFIG_PM is not defined
  • From: Eyal Shapira <eyal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] wlcore: fix undefined symbols when CONFIG_PM is not defined
  • From: Eyal Shapira <eyal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the l2-mtd tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] wlcore: fix undefined symbols when CONFIG_PM is not defined
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the l2-mtd tree with Linus' tree
  • From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] wlcore: fix undefined symbols when CONFIG_PM is not defined
  • From: Luciano Coelho <coelho@xxxxxx>
• [PATCH] wlcore: fix undefined symbols when CONFIG_PM is not defined
  • From: Eyal Shapira <eyal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (sparc tree related)
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 29
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (sparc tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the l2-mtd tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the l2-mtd tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the l2-mtd tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: triage for April 19, 2012
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• wlcore.ko undefined symbols
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pinctrl tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: triage for April 19, 2012
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: triage for April 19, 2012
  • From: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: triage for April 19, 2012
  • From: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the dma-buf tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 28
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the dma-buf tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the dma-mapping tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the pinctrl tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: triage for April 19, 2012
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: triage for April 19, 2012
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: triage for April 19, 2012
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: no tree today
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: usual request
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] hwmon/sch56xx: Depend on watchdog for watchdog core functions
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] hwmon/sch56xx: Depend on watchdog for watchdog core functions
  • From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 24 (hwmon/sch56xx)
  • From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 24 (hwmon/sch56xx)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch -linus] regmap: REMAP_IRQ should select IRQ_DOMAIN itself
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next] "blackfin: twi: move twi bit mask macro to twi head file"
  • From: Bob Liu <lliubbo@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch -linus] regmap: REMAP_IRQ should select IRQ_DOMAIN itself
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 24
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch -linus] regmap: REMAP_IRQ should select IRQ_DOMAIN itself
  • From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch -linus] regmap: REMAP_IRQ should select IRQ_DOMAIN itself
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch -linus] regmap: REMAP_IRQ should select IRQ_DOMAIN itself
  • From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [linux-next] "blackfin: twi: move twi bit mask macro to twi head file"
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch -linus] regmap: REMAP_IRQ should select IRQ_DOMAIN itself
  • From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 23 (uml)
  • From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 23 (uml)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 23 (uml)
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 23 (uml)
  • From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 23 (uml)
  • From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch -linus] regmap: REMAP_IRQ should select IRQ_DOMAIN itself
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (watchdog tree related)
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] acpi: fix acpi_bus.h warnings when ACPI is not enabled
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 23 (uml)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch -linus] regmap: REMAP_IRQ should select IRQ_DOMAIN itself
  • From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch -linus] regmap: REMAP_IRQ should select IRQ_DOMAIN itself
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [SOLUTION] linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 23
  • From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 23
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [patch -linus] regmap: REMAP_IRQ should select IRQ_DOMAIN itself
  • From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (watchdog tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: signal.git
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• signal.git
  • From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [patch] sched, numa: Allocate node_queue on any node for offline nodes
  • From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: triage for May 22, 2012
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: bad merge in the block tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] x86: auto poll/interrupt mode switch for CMC to stop CMC storm
  • From: Chen Gong <gong.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] x86: auto poll/interrupt mode switch for CMC to stop CMC storm
  • From: Chen Gong <gong.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: triage for May 22, 2012
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bad ux500 merge fix leads to linux-next failure
  • From: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
• Bad ux500 merge fix leads to linux-next failure
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [linux-next] "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" commit
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: bad commit in the cgroup tree
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Guenter Roeck <guenter@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: bad commit in the cgroup tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: unable to fetch the watchdog tree
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 2 (regmap-irq)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the userns tree with Linus' tree
  • From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the tree
  • From: John Crispin <blogic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 2
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the edac tree with the trivial tree
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the tree
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the mips tree
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the edac tree with the trivial tree
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 2
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the userns tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the mips tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Sage Weil <sage@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: PowerPC boot failures in next-20120521
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: PowerPC boot failures in next-20120521
  • From: Michael Neuling <mikey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: PowerPC boot failures in next-20120521
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: PowerPC boot failures in next-20120521
  • From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: PowerPC boot failures in next-20120521
  • From: Michael Neuling <mikey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: PowerPC boot failures in next-20120521
  • From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: PowerPC boot failures in next-20120521
  • From: Michael Neuling <mikey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: PowerPC boot failures in next-20120521
  • From: Michael Neuling <mikey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: PowerPC boot failures in next-20120521
  • From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: PowerPC boot failures in next-20120521
  • From: Michael Neuling <mikey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the nfs tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: PowerPC boot failures in next-20120521
  • From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: PowerPC boot failures in next-20120521
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91: Add ADC driver to at91sam9260/at91sam9g20 dtsi files
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: unable to fetch the watchdog tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the userns tree with the tip tree
  • From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the userns tree
  • From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
• RE: [PATCH -next v2] usb: add usb.h stubs for CONFIG_USB not enabled
  • From: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the infiniband tree
  • From: Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 21
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 21
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 21
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the infiniband tree
  • From: Vipul Pandya <vipul@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the net-next tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
  • From: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91: Add ADC driver to at91sam9260/at91sam9g20 dtsi files
  • From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 21
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the userns tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the userns tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the gpio tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the net-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the net-next tree
  • From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the net-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-ppc tree with the kvm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the infiniband tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree (userns tree related)
  • From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 16 (mfd/tpx6586x)
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next v2] usb: add usb.h stubs for CONFIG_USB not enabled
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] usb: add usb.h stubs for CONFIG_USB not enabled
  • From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 16 (mfd/tpx6586x)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (edac)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] usb: add usb.h stubs for CONFIG_USB not enabled
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] usb: add usb.h stubs for CONFIG_USB not enabled
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (drm drivers and vgacon)
  • From: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] usb: add usb.h stubs for CONFIG_USB not enabled
  • From: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] usb: add usb.h stubs for CONFIG_USB not enabled
  • From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 16 (mfd/tpx6586x)
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (edac)
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (edac)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] usb: add usb.h stubs for CONFIG_USB not enabled
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Guenter Roeck <guenter@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 18 (drm drivers and vgacon)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] comedi: fix build when USB is not enabled
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] comedi: fix build when USB is not enabled
  • From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] comedi: fix build when USB is not enabled
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (battery tree related)
  • From: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next] "edac: Remove the legacy EDAC ABI"
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [linux-next] "edac: Remove the legacy EDAC ABI"
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91: Add ADC driver to at91sam9260/at91sam9g20 dtsi files
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 16 (mfd/mc13xxx)
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 18
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the edac tree with the trivial tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the edac tree with the trivial tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the isci tree with the scsi tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Having a linux-next feed tree based on net-next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Having a linux-next feed tree based on net-next
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91: Add ADC driver to at91sam9260/at91sam9g20 dtsi files
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm with the tree
  • From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
• [PATCH -next] staging: gdm72xx depends on NET
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91: Add ADC driver to at91sam9260/at91sam9g20 dtsi files
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 17
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] wdt: fix iTCO printk format warnings
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] wdt: ie6xx_wdt needs io.h
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: question about the sound tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the sparc-next tree
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: question about the sound tree
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree with the powerpc tree
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree with the powerpc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the sparc-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: bad commit in the tile tree
  • From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: question about the sound tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: bad commit in the tile tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] staging: gdm72xx: WIMAX_GDM72XX_USB_PM should depend on USB_SUSPEND
  • From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] staging: gdm72xx: WIMAX_GDM72XX_USB_PM should depend on USB_SUSPEND
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91: Add ADC driver to at91sam9260/at91sam9g20 dtsi files
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 16 (mfd/mc13xxx)
  • From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfs tree
  • From: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm with the tree
  • From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 16 (mfd/mc13xxx)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] ARM: at91: Add ADC driver to at91sam9260/at91sam9g20 dtsi files
  • From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (staging tree related)
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the userns tree
  • From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the staging tree
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (staging tree related)
  • From: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the staging tree
  • From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the staging tree
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the tip tree
  • From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the staging tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the staging tree
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (staging tree related)
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the staging tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the staging tree
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 16
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (staging tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree (userns tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the userns tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  • From: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-ppc tree
  • From: Alexander Graf <agraf@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-ppc tree
  • From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the staging tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the gpio tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the tip tree
  • From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree with the arm tree
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-ppc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (battery tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the sparc-next tree
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kbuild tree with the sparc-next tree
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the sparc-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kbuild tree with the sparc-next tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kbuild tree with the sparc-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the userns tree
  • From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 10 (fs/inode.c)
  • From: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next commit "ARM: dma-mapping: move all dma bounce code to separate dma ops structure"
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] net/codel: Add missing #include <linux/prefetch.h>
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: "Turquette, Mike" <mturquette@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] net/codel: Add missing #include <linux/prefetch.h>
  • From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] nfc: shdlc needs to select CRC_CCITT
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] wdt: fix iTCO printk format warnings
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] wdt: ie6xx_wdt needs io.h
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] nfc: shdlc needs to select CRC_CCITT
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] net/codel: Add missing #include <linux/prefetch.h>
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] watchdog: fix ie6xx_wdt.c printk format warning
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] via_wdt: depends on PCI
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 14
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the userns tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the omap_dss2 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the l2-mtd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the slave-dma tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the gpio tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the sparc-next tree
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the sparc-next tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the sparc-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the origin tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: failed to fetch the cifs tree
  • From: Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the rr tree
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the origin tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: failed to fetch the cifs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] watchdog: fix ie6xx_wdt.c printk format warning
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 11 (perf_event_amd.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] net: of/phy: fix build error when phylib is built as a module
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] via_wdt: depends on PCI
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] printk: add stub for prepend_timestamp()
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 11 (printk)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] net: of/phy: fix build error when phylib is built as a module
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] net: of/phy: fix build error when phylib is built as a module
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] net: of/phy: fix build error when phylib is built as a module
  • From: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 10 (net/phy)
  • From: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] net: of/phy: fix build error when phylib is built as a module
  • From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the usb tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] wireless: TI wlxxx depends on MAC80211
  • From: "Arend van Spriel" <arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: [PATCHv9 10/10] ARM: dma-mapping: add support for IOMMU mapper
  • From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 11
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (akpm tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the usb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: triage for May 10, 2012
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 10 (net/phy)
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 10 (net/phy)
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCHv9 10/10] ARM: dma-mapping: add support for IOMMU mapper
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 10 (fs/inode.c)
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] printk: correctly align __log_buf
  • From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] printk: correctly align __log_buf
  • From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Regression due to 7ff9554 "printk: convert byte-buffer to variable-length record buffer"
  • From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 10 (net/phy)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] wireless: TI wlxxx depends on MAC80211
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] wireless: TI wlxxx depends on MAC80211
  • From: Luciano Coelho <coelho@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] wireless: TI wlxxx depends on MAC80211
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 10 (fs/inode.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Regression due to 7ff9554 "printk: convert byte-buffer to variable-length record buffer"
  • From: Kay Sievers <kay@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Regression due to 7ff9554 "printk: convert byte-buffer to variable-length record buffer"
  • From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Regression due to 7ff9554 "printk: convert byte-buffer to variable-length record buffer"
  • From: Kay Sievers <kay@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Regression due to 7ff9554 "printk: convert byte-buffer to variable-length record buffer"
  • From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Regression due to 7ff9554 "printk: convert byte-buffer to variable-length record buffer"
  • From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Regression due to 7ff9554 "printk: convert byte-buffer to variable-length record buffer"
  • From: Kay Sievers <kay@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Regression due to 7ff9554 "printk: convert byte-buffer to variable-length record buffer"
  • From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the xfs tree
  • From: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the xfs tree
  • From: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the xfs tree
  • From: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-post-merge tree with the driver-core tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the driver-core tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound-asoc tree with the regmap tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 10
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-post-merge tree with the driver-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound-asoc tree with the regmap tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-post-merge tree with the driver-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound-asoc tree with the regmap tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the rr tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Ola Lilja <ola.o.lilja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the driver-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound-asoc tree with the regmap tree
  • From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the sound-asoc tree with the regmap tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the xfs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Regression due to 7ff9554 "printk: convert byte-buffer to variable-length record buffer"
  • From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] gma500: Fix build without ACPI
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] gma500: Fix build without ACPI
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] powerpc: fix compile fail in hugetlb cmdline parsing
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] powerpc: fix compile fail in hugetlb cmdline parsing
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 6.2/7] MMC: mmci: Enable Device Tree support for ux500
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 8 (printk)
  • From: Kay Sievers <kay@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 6.2/7] MMC: mmci: Enable Device Tree support for ux500
  • From: Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 8 (printk)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 6.2/7] MMC: mmci: Enable Device Tree support for ux500
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 8 (printk)
  • From: Kay Sievers <kay@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 8 (printk)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 8 (printk)
  • From: Kay Sievers <kay@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 8 (gpu/drm/gma500)
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 8 (gpu/drm/gma500)
  • From: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 8 (gpu/drm/gma500)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for May 8 (printk)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 6.2/7] MMC: mmci: Enable Device Tree support for ux500
  • From: Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 6.2/7] MMC: mmci: Enable Device Tree support for ux500
  • From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 6.2/7] MMC: mmci: Enable Device Tree support for ux500
  • From: Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 6.2/7] MMC: mmci: Enable Device Tree support for ux500
  • From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (driver-core tree related)
  • From: Kay Sievers <kay@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: inux-next: Tree for Apr 27 (uml + mm/memcontrol.c)
  • From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the crypto tree
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 8
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (driver-core tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the crypto tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the drm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] powerpc: fix compile fail in hugetlb cmdline parsing
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: failed import of rr tree
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the ceph tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: failed import of rr tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: triage for May 7, 2012
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 6.2/7] MMC: mmci: Enable Device Tree support for ux500
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the kbuild tree
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] tty/amiserial: Add missing argument for tty_unlock()
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the kbuild tree
  • From: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] kbuild: all{no,yes,mod,def,rand}config only read files when instructed to.
  • From: Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx>
• Re: inux-next: Tree for Apr 27 (uml + mm/memcontrol.c)
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the usb.current tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the usb.current tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the tty tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] powerpc: fix compile fail in hugetlb cmdline parsing
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: inux-next: Tree for Apr 27 (uml + mm/memcontrol.c)
  • From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] kbuild: all{no,yes,mod,def,rand}config only read files when instructed to.
  • From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (battery tree related)
  • From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 7
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (battery tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (kbuild tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the tty tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the kbuild tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: triage for May 6, 2012
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the usb.current tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 20 (usb & target)
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: inux-next: Tree for Apr 27 (uml + mm/memcontrol.c)
  • From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: inux-next: Tree for Apr 27 (uml + mm/memcontrol.c)
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 20 (usb & target)
  • From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 20 (usb & target)
  • From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree (nfs tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 4
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree (nfs tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the wireless tree
  • From: "Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr 20 (usb & target)
  • From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the wireless tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: strange commits in the drivers-x86 tree
  • From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: failure to fetch samsung and bjdooks-i2c trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: strange commits in the drivers-x86 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: inux-next: Tree for Apr 27 (uml + mm/memcontrol.c)
  • From: Hiroyuki Kamezawa <kamezawa.hiroyuki@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: triage for May 3, 2012
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: inux-next: Tree for Apr 27 (uml + mm/memcontrol.c)
  • From: Hiroyuki Kamezawa <kamezawa.hiroyuki@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: inux-next: Tree for Apr 27 (uml + mm/memcontrol.c)
  • From: Hiroyuki Kamezawa <kamezawa.hiroyuki@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: inux-next: Tree for Apr 27 (uml + mm/memcontrol.c)
  • From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the input tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: inux-next: Tree for Apr 27 (uml + mm/memcontrol.c)
  • From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: inux-next: Tree for Apr 27 (uml + mm/memcontrol.c)
  • From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: inux-next: Tree for Apr 27 (uml + mm/memcontrol.c)
  • From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] wireless: TI wlxxx depends on MAC80211
  • From: Luciano Coelho <coelho@xxxxxx>
• Re: inux-next: Tree for Apr 27 (uml + mm/memcontrol.c)
  • From: Hiroyuki Kamezawa <kamezawa.hiroyuki@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: inux-next: Tree for Apr 27 (uml + mm/memcontrol.c)
  • From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 3
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net-next tree related)
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net-next tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the driver-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt patch is missing an include
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the input tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the usb.current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -V6 07/14] memcg: Add HugeTLB extension
  • From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the net-next tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the net-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] RDMA/ocrdma: Fix build with IPV6=n
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] RDMA/ocrdma: Fix build with IPV6=n
  • From: Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-ppc tree
  • From: Alexander Graf <agraf@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Request for inclusion of ep93xx tree in linux-next
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Request for inclusion of ep93xx tree in linux-next
  • From: Ryan Mallon <rmallon@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: There is no tree for May 2
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: triage for May 1, 2012
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -V6 07/14] memcg: Add HugeTLB extension
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the vfs tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] dynamic_debug: use printk(KERN_WARNING..) in stub function
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] dynamic_debug: use printk(KERN_WARNING..) in stub function
  • From: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Request for inclusion of ep93xx tree in linux-next
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-ppc tree
  • From: Alexander Graf <agraf@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the pci tree
  • From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
  • From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for May 1
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the pci tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the vfs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-ppc tree
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-ppc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Request for inclusion of ep93xx tree in linux-next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Request for inclusion of ep93xx tree in linux-next
  • From: Ryan Mallon <rmallon@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH resend] nfsd: fix nfs4recover.c printk format warning
  • From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH resend] nfsd: fix nfs4recover.c printk format warning
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH net-next] net/l2tp: fix build error in l2tp from missing ipv6 checksum include
  • From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH net-next] net/l2tp: fix build error in l2tp from missing ipv6 checksum include
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ARM:mfd: fix ezx-pcap build failure
  • From: Mark Asselstine <mark.asselstine@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net-next tree related)
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the hid tree
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Apr 30
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net-next tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the hid tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: inux-next: Tree for Apr 27 (uml + mm/memcontrol.c)
  • From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: inux-next: Tree for Apr 27 (uml + mm/memcontrol.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: inux-next: Tree for Apr 27 (infiniband/hw/ocrdma)
  • From: Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: inux-next: Tree for Apr 27 (uml + mm/memcontrol.c)
  • From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>