Linux Next

• Thread Index

• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net-next tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the vfs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the slave-dma tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the target-merge tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the mmc tree with the slave-dma tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the pci tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the nfs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the ceph tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• mmotm 2012-07-20-16-30 uploaded
  • From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the target-merge tree
  • From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] m68k/apollo: Rename "timer" to "apollo_timer"
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tty tree
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tty tree
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 20 (gfs2)
  • From: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the target-merge tree
  • From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tty tree
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the target-merge tree
  • From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the target-merge tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the target-merge tree
  • From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 20 (gfs2)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 17 (debugobjects: bt | btusb | usb related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 17 (debugobjects: bt | btusb | usb related?)
  • From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] mfd/regulator: tps65217: Move regulator plat data handling to regulator
  • From: AnilKumar Ch <anilkumar@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi tree with Linus' tree
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for July 20
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (tty tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: Christian Riesch <christian.riesch@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the tty tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the tty tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the scsi tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the target-merge tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Javier Muñoz <jmunhoz@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: [PATCH] regulator: tps65217: fix build error if REGULATOR is not enabled
  • From: "AnilKumar, Chimata" <anilkumar@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tty tree
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for July 19
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the random tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the target-merge tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the tty tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Trees and MAINTAINERS of random drivers?
  • From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 17 (mfd: AB3100 - ab3100_probe: undefined reference to `rand_initialize_irq')
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Trees and MAINTAINERS of random drivers?
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Trees and MAINTAINERS of random drivers?
  • From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Trees and MAINTAINERS of random drivers?
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: no tree for July 18
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 17
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] regulator: tps65217: fix build error if REGULATOR is not enabled
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: [PATCH] regulator: tps65217: fix build error if REGULATOR is not enabled
  • From: "AnilKumar, Chimata" <anilkumar@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] regulator: tps65217: fix build error if REGULATOR is not enabled
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 17
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] regulator: tps65217: fix build error if REGULATOR is not enabled
  • From: AnilKumar Ch <anilkumar@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] random: Remove remaining relicts of rand_initialize_irq()
  • From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 17 (mfd/tps65217.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 17 (fs/sync.c)
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 17 (fs/sync.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] random: Remove remaining relicts of rand_initialize_irq()
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 17 (mfd: AB3100 - ab3100_probe: undefined reference to `rand_initialize_irq')
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] random: Remove remaining relicts of rand_initialize_irq()
  • From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tty tree
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tty tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tty tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] random: Remove remaining relicts of rand_initialize_irq()
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 17 (mfd: AB3100 - ab3100_probe: undefined reference to `rand_initialize_irq')
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 17 (mfd: AB3100 - ab3100_probe: undefined reference to `rand_initialize_irq')
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tty tree
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 17 (mfd: AB3100 - ab3100_probe: undefined reference to `rand_initialize_irq')
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 12 (v4l2-ioctl.c)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 12 (v4l2-ioctl.c)
  • From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for July 17
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the tty tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the regulator tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 12 (v4l2-ioctl.c)
  • From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the regulator tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the l2-mtd tree with the mtd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] staging: fix sm7xxfb build, depends on PCI
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for July 16 - Build failure
  • From: Alexandre Pereira da Silva <aletes.xgr@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 16
  • From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the infiniband tree
  • From: Jack Morgenstein <jackm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the infiniband tree
  • From: Jack Morgenstein <jackm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 16
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 16
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 16
  • From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 16 (regression in timer-code)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for July 16
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the ext4 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the remoteproc tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the remoteproc tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the battery tree
  • From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the battery tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the arm-current tree
  • From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the arm-current tree
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the arm-current tree
  • From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 12 (pci)
  • From: Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the clk tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Mike Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the clk tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 13
  • From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-07-10-16-59 uploaded
  • From: "S, Venkatraman" <svenkatr@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tty tree
  • From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] ARM: mxs: fix compile error caused by prom_update_property change
  • From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for July 13
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the clk tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the tty tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slave-dma tree with the arm tree
  • From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 12 (pci)
  • From: Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] iio: dac: ad5064: fix section mismatch in ad5064_init() in linux-next
  • From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] iio: ad5064: Move bus write callbacks to #if protected sections
  • From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 12 (pci)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 12 (v4l2-ioctl.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-07-10-16-59 uploaded (staging/ccg)
  • From: "'Greg Kroah-Hartman'" <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-07-10-16-59 uploaded (staging/ccg)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the infiniband tree
  • From: Hadar Hen Zion <hadarh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the infiniband tree
  • From: Hadar Hen Zion <hadarh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] powerpc: remove rejected merge file from arch/powerpc/kernel in linux-next
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 10 (gpio/gpio-tps65910.c)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 10 (gpio/gpio-tps65910.c)
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: mmotm 2012-07-10-16-59 uploaded (staging/ccg)
  • From: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] powerpc: remove rejected merge file from arch/powerpc/kernel in linux-next
  • From: Gerard Snitselaar <dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-ppc tree with the powerpc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for July 12
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-ppc tree with the powerpc tree
  • From: Alexander Graf <agraf@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the slab tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-ppc tree with the powerpc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the infiniband tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the infiniband tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the scsi tree with the libata tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-07-10-16-59 uploaded (staging/ccg)
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-07-10-16-59 uploaded (staging/ccg)
  • From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-07-10-16-59 uploaded (staging/ccg)
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-07-10-16-59 uploaded (staging/ccg)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 10 (mfd/arizona-irq.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 10 (gpio/gpio-tps65910.c)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 10 (gpio/gpio-tps65910.c)
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-pm] cpuidle future and improvements
  • From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 10 (gpio/gpio-tps65910.c)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-07-10-16-59 uploaded
  • From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-07-10-16-59 uploaded
  • From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 10 (gpio/gpio-tps65910.c)
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-07-10-16-59 uploaded
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-07-10-16-59 uploaded
  • From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] iio: ad5064: Move bus write callbacks to #if protected sections
  • From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-07-10-16-59 uploaded
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-07-10-16-59 uploaded
  • From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-07-10-16-59 uploaded
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: no tree for July 11
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] iio: dac: ad5064: fix section mismatch in ad5064_init() in linux-next
  • From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-07-10-16-59 uploaded
  • From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 10 (iio)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 10 (gpio/gpio-tps65910.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] iio: dac: ad5064: fix section mismatch in ad5064_init() in linux-next
  • From: Gerard Snitselaar <dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• mmotm 2012-07-10-16-59 uploaded
  • From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for July 10
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the driver-core.current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the i2c-embedded tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ext4 tree
  • From: Aditya Kali <adityakali@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the ext4 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 2 (crypto/hifn_795x)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio-lw tree
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 2 (crypto/hifn_795x)
  • From: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] apic: fix kvm build on UP without IOAPIC
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: comment on pm tree commit
  • From: preeti <preeti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: comment on pm tree commit
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for July 9
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the gpio-lw tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: boot failure in next-20120705 and 20120706
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: boot failure in next-20120705 and 20120706
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 2/2] genirq: export dummy_irq_chip
  • From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/2] genirq: export irq_set_chip_and_handler_name()
  • From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the infiniband tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio-lw tree
  • From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: comment on pm tree commit
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] apic: fix kvm build on UP without IOAPIC
  • From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio-lw tree
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 2 (crypto/hifn_795x)
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 6 (olpc "resume")
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 6 (usb/otg)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] apic: fix kvm build on UP without IOAPIC
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the dt-rh tree with the l2-mtd tree
  • From: Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] apic: fix kvm build on UP without IOAPIC
  • From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] apic: fix kvm build on UP without IOAPIC
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio-lw tree
  • From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for July 6
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio-lw tree
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the infiniband tree
  • From: "Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio-lw tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Alan Modra <amodra@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the input-mt tree with the input-current tree
  • From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the dt-rh tree with the l2-mtd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the infiniband tree
  • From: Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the infiniband tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the arm-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Alan Modra <amodra@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Next: please switch the GPIO tree to mine
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the input-mt tree with the input-current tree
  • From: "Henrik Rydberg" <rydberg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the input-mt tree with the input-current tree
  • From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Next: please switch the GPIO tree to mine
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the wireless tree
  • From: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-ppc tree
  • From: Yoder Stuart-B08248 <B08248@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Next: please switch the GPIO tree to mine
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next : cpuidle - could you add my tree please
  • From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Alan Modra <amodra@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for July 5
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the arm-current tree
  • From: Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the arm-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-ppc tree
  • From: Alexander Graf <agraf@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the kvm-ppc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-ppc tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the vfs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the input-mt tree with the input-current tree
  • From: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the input-mt tree with the input-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Please add the random tree to linux-next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Please add the random tree to linux-next
  • From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-06-29-17-00 uploaded
  • From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: No tree for July 4
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-06-29-17-00 uploaded
  • From: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next : cpuidle - could you add my tree please
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next : cpuidle - could you add my tree please
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] apic: fix kvm build on UP without IOAPIC
  • From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next : cpuidle - could you add my tree please
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next : cpuidle - could you add my tree please
  • From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next : cpuidle - could you add my tree please
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next : cpuidle - could you add my tree please
  • From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pwm tree related)
  • From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pwm tree related)
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pwm tree related)
  • From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next] Kconfig HID dependency error from roccat merge
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the hid tree
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pwm tree related)
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pwm tree related)
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next : cpuidle - could you add my tree please
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pwm tree related)
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pwm tree related)
  • From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pwm tree related)
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pwm tree related)
  • From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pwm tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pwm tree related)
  • From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 3
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for July 3
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pwm tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [linux-next] Kconfig HID dependency error from roccat merge
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the wireless tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next : cpuidle - could you add my tree please
  • From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next : cpuidle - could you add my tree please
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next : cpuidle - could you add my tree please
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-06-29-17-00 uploaded
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 2 (crypto/hifn_795x)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for July 2 (pktgen)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 19 (mfd/max77693-irq.c)
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next : cpuidle - could you add my tree please
  • From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-06-29-17-00 uploaded
  • From: Luming Yu <luming.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-06-29-17-00 uploaded
  • From: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-06-29-17-00 uploaded
  • From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next : cpuidle - could you add my tree please
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for July 2
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the libata tree
  • From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the libata tree
  • From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Request VFIO inclusion in linux-next
  • From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the libata tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Request VFIO inclusion in linux-next
  • From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the libata tree
  • From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warnings after merge of the libata tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the slave-dma tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the isci tree with the libata tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the libata tree
  • From: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the hid tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the libata tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the nfs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] apic: fix kvm build on UP without IOAPIC
  • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for June 29 (kvm)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] apic: fix kvm build on UP without IOAPIC
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] apic: fix kvm build on UP without IOAPIC
  • From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for June 29 (kvm)
  • From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for June 29 (kvm)
  • From: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for June 29 (kvm)
  • From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for June 29 (kvm)
  • From: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pwm tree related)
  • From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pwm tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pwm tree related)
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pwm tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pwm tree related)
  • From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pwm tree related)
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pwm tree related)
  • From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• mmotm 2012-06-29-17-00 uploaded
  • From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: linux-next: Tree for June 29 (kvm)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] MFD: twl6040: Update Kconfig to avoid build breakage
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the trivial tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: nfs root problem in linux-next
  • From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: nfs root problem in linux-next
  • From: Mark Salter <msalter@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: nfs root problem in linux-next
  • From: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the hid tree
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for June 29
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pwm tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the pwm tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the pwm tree with the tegra tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the pwm tree with the s5p tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
  • From: Sjur BRENDELAND <sjur.brandeland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the trivial tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: commit "ARM: dma-mapping: remove custom consistent dma region"
  • From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the hid tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: VFIO compile failure on i386 allmodconfig in linux-next
  • From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 27 (eliminated_printk)
  • From: Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 27 (eliminated_printk)
  • From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 27 (eliminated_printk)
  • From: Shuah Khan <shuahkhan@xxxxxxxxx>
• VFIO compile failure on i386 allmodconfig in linux-next
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Request VFIO inclusion in linux-next
  • From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for June 28
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the l2-mtd tree with the m68k tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the net-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 27 (eliminated_printk)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• commit "ARM: dma-mapping: remove custom consistent dma region"
  • From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Request VFIO inclusion in linux-next
  • From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 27 (vfio)
  • From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 27 (eliminated_printk)
  • From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 27 (eliminated_printk)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 27 (dm-thin.c)
  • From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 27 (dm-thin.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 27 (vfio)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Request VFIO inclusion in linux-next
  • From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (device-mapper tree related)
  • From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 27
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (device-mapper tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the hid tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Request VFIO inclusion in linux-next
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Request VFIO inclusion in linux-next
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2] mod/file2alias: make modalias generation safe for cross compiling
  • From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] av32: Make sure _TIF_BREAKPOINT is defined
  • From: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 26
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] mod/file2alias: make modalias generation safe for cross compiling
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Request VFIO inclusion in linux-next
  • From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: nfs root problem in linux-next
  • From: Mark Salter <msalter@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: nfs root problem in linux-next
  • From: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next : cpuidle - could you add my tree please
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] mod/file2alias: make modalias generation safe for cross compiling
  • From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] av32: Make sure _TIF_BREAKPOINT is defined
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] mod/file2alias: make modalias generation safe for cross compiling
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• nfs root problem in linux-next
  • From: Mark Salter <msalter@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
  • From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pci tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next : cpuidle - could you add my tree please
  • From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-pm] cpuidle future and improvements
  • From: "Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-pm] cpuidle future and improvements
  • From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-pm] cpuidle future and improvements
  • From: "Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx>
• Re: cpuidle future and improvements
  • From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] mod/file2alias: make modalias generation safe for cross compiling
  • From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: viresh kumar <viresh.kumar2@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 25
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pci tree with Linus' tree
  • From: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Rajeev kumar <rajeev-dlh.kumar@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the jdelvare-hwmon tree
  • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: implicit declarations of BUG/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/WARN_ON_ONCE
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the jdelvare-hwmon tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: implicit declarations of BUG/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/WARN_ON_ONCE
  • From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: implicit declarations of BUG/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/WARN_ON_ONCE
  • From: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: implicit declarations of BUG/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/WARN_ON_ONCE
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: implicit declarations of BUG/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/WARN_ON_ONCE
  • From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: implicit declarations of BUG/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/WARN_ON_ONCE
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: implicit declarations of BUG/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/WARN_ON_ONCE
  • From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: implicit declarations of BUG/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/WARN_ON_ONCE
  • From: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the pci tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the cifs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the slave-dma tree
  • From: Zhangfei Gao <zgao6@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [dm-devel] mmotm 2012-06-21-16-20 uploaded (dm-thin)
  • From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-06-21-16-20 uploaded (dm-thin)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-06-21-16-20 uploaded (dm-thin)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 (netfilter)
  • From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 21 (netfilter)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-06-21-16-20 uploaded (dm-thin)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-06-21-16-20 uploaded
  • From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-06-21-16-20 uploaded
  • From: viresh kumar <viresh.kumar2@xxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-06-21-16-20 uploaded
  • From: Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: implicit declarations of BUG/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/WARN_ON_ONCE
  • From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 22
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] avr: Fix sanitize tsk_is_polling fallout
  • From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the slave-dma tree
  • From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the slave-dma tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc related)
  • From: Michael Ellerman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Ksummit-2012-discuss] [ATTEND] stable kernel stuff and grumpy maintainers [bisection/rebase/-next]
  • From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] pstore: fix printk format warning in ram.c
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Ksummit-2012-discuss] [ATTEND] stable kernel stuff and grumpy maintainers [bisection/rebase/-next]
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Ksummit-2012-discuss] [ATTEND] stable kernel stuff and grumpy maintainers [bisection/rebase/-next]
  • From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Ksummit-2012-discuss] [ATTEND] stable kernel stuff and grumpy maintainers [bisection/rebase/-next]
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-06-21-16-20 uploaded
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• mmotm 2012-06-21-16-20 uploaded
  • From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Ksummit-2012-discuss] [ATTEND] stable kernel stuff and grumpy maintainers [bisection/rebase/-next]
  • From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Ksummit-2012-discuss] [ATTEND] stable kernel stuff and grumpy maintainers [bisection/rebase/-next]
  • From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is the right practice to get new code upstream( was Fwd: [patch] a simple hardware detector for latency as well as throughput ver. 0.1.0)
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is the right practice to get new code upstream( was Fwd: [patch] a simple hardware detector for latency as well as throughput ver. 0.1.0)
  • From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc related)
  • From: Alan Modra <amodra@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc related)
  • From: Alan Modra <amodra@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (wireless-next tree related)
  • From: "Arend van Spriel" <arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
  • From: "Kim, Milo" <Milo.Kim@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
  • From: Axel Lin <axel.lin@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
  • From: "Kim, Milo" <Milo.Kim@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc related)
  • From: Gabriel Paubert <paubert@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc related)
  • From: Michael Ellerman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the slab tree
  • From: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc related)
  • From: Michael Ellerman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc related)
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 21
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (wireless-next tree related)
  • From: "Arend van Spriel" <arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (wireless-next tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc related)
  • From: Michael Ellerman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the slab tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 20 (hweight return type)
  • From: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 20 (hweight return type)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 20 (hweight return type)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
  • From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc related)
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: viresh kumar <viresh.kumar2@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: viresh kumar <viresh.kumar2@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 20
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the remoteproc tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the remoteproc tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
  • From: Axel Lin <axel.lin@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the regulator tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: Bhupesh SHARMA <bhupesh.sharma@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: Bhupesh SHARMA <bhupesh.sharma@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• mmotm 2012-06-19-14-24 uploaded
  • From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: asm/kvm_para.h from asm-generic (was: Re: linux-next: triage for April 19, 2012)
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: asm/kvm_para.h from asm-generic (was: Re: linux-next: triage for April 19, 2012)
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 19 (mfd/max77693-irq.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] Makefile: fix up CROSS_COMPILE and READABLE_ASM interaction.
  • From: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the v4l-dvb tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the v4l-dvb tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the v4l-dvb tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] Makefile: fix up CROSS_COMPILE and READABLE_ASM interaction.
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 4
  • From: Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (acpi and battery trees related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (acpi and battery trees related)
  • From: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 19
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the battery tree
  • From: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (acpi and battery trees related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the battery tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18 (netfilter nfconntrack)
  • From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the v4l-dvb tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the pci tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18 (kmsg problems)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18 (kmsg problems)
  • From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18 (kmsg problems)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18 (kmsg problems)
  • From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18 (kmsg problems)
  • From: Kay Sievers <kay@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18 (kmsg problems)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18 (kmsg problems)
  • From: Kay Sievers <kay@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18 (kmsg problems)
  • From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18 (kmsg problems)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cpuidle future and improvements
  • From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cpuidle future and improvements
  • From: Colin Cross <ccross@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18 (netfilter nfconntrack)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18 (kmsg problems)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: implicit declarations of BUG/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/WARN_ON_ONCE
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-pm] cpuidle future and improvements
  • From: a0393909 <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx>
• Re: cpuidle future and improvements
  • From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cpuidle future and improvements
  • From: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cpuidle future and improvements
  • From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cpuidle future and improvements
  • From: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cpuidle future and improvements
  • From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cpuidle future and improvements
  • From: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• cpuidle future and improvements
  • From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 18
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [-next] FATAL: drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl: sizeof(struct usb_device_id)=24 is not a modulo of the size of section __mod_usb_device_table=44.
  • From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [-next] FATAL: drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl: sizeof(struct usb_device_id)=24 is not a modulo of the size of section __mod_usb_device_table=44.
  • From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 14 (leds)
  • From: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] avr: Fix sanitize tsk_is_polling fallout
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [-next] FATAL: drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl: sizeof(struct usb_device_id)=24 is not a modulo of the size of section __mod_usb_device_table=44.
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [-next] FATAL: drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl: sizeof(struct usb_device_id)=24 is not a modulo of the size of section __mod_usb_device_table=44.
  • From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [-next] FATAL: drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl: sizeof(struct usb_device_id)=24 is not a modulo of the size of section __mod_usb_device_table=44.
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [-next] FATAL: drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl: sizeof(struct usb_device_id)=24 is not a modulo of the size of section __mod_usb_device_table=44.
  • From: Philippe De Muyter <phdm@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [-next] FATAL: drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl: sizeof(struct usb_device_id)=24 is not a modulo of the size of section __mod_usb_device_table=44.
  • From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [-next] FATAL: drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl: sizeof(struct usb_device_id)=24 is not a modulo of the size of section __mod_usb_device_table=44.
  • From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [-next] FATAL: drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl: sizeof(struct usb_device_id)=24 is not a modulo of the size of section __mod_usb_device_table=44.
  • From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [-next] FATAL: drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl: sizeof(struct usb_device_id)=24 is not a modulo of the size of section __mod_usb_device_table=44.
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [-next] FATAL: drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl: sizeof(struct usb_device_id)=24 is not a modulo of the size of section __mod_usb_device_table=44.
  • From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] pstore: fix printk format warning in ram.c
  • From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] pstore: fix printk format warning in ram.c
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [-next] FATAL: drivers/gpu/drm/udl/udl: sizeof(struct usb_device_id)=24 is not a modulo of the size of section __mod_usb_device_table=44.
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 14 (leds)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: implicit declarations of BUG/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/WARN_ON_ONCE
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: Tree for Jun 14 (staging/comedi)
  • From: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 14 (staging/comedi)
  • From: Ian Abbott <abbotti@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: Tree for Jun 14 (vsmp)
  • From: "Shai Fultheim (Shai@xxxxxxxxxxx)" <Shai@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
• error: implicit declarations of BUG/BUG_ON/WARN_ON/WARN_ON_ONCE
  • From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 15
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 14 (leds)
  • From: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 14 (leds)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 14 (vsmp)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is the right practice to get new code upstream( was Fwd: [patch] a simple hardware detector for latency as well as throughput ver. 0.1.0)
  • From: Luming Yu <luming.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the wireless tree
  • From: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next] "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" commit
  • From: viresh kumar <viresh.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next] "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" commit
  • From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is the right practice to get new code upstream( was Fwd: [patch] a simple hardware detector for latency as well as throughput ver. 0.1.0)
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next] "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" commit
  • From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is the right practice to get new code upstream( was Fwd: [patch] a simple hardware detector for latency as well as throughput ver. 0.1.0)
  • From: Luming Yu <luming.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ARM: netx: Reuse dummy clk routines for non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK case
  • From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] ARM: netx: Reuse dummy clk routines for non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK case
  • From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar2@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 14
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the wireless tree
  • From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan <mohammed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: asm/kvm_para.h from asm-generic (was: Re: linux-next: triage for April 19, 2012)
  • From: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the wireless tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 13 (crypto)
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pci tree related)
  • From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What is the right practice to get new code upstream( was Fwd: [patch] a simple hardware detector for latency as well as throughput ver. 0.1.0)
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next] "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" commit
  • From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 13 (crypto)
  • From: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 13 (crypto)
  • From: Johannes Goetzfried <Johannes.Goetzfried@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 13 (crypto)
  • From: Jussi Kivilinna <jussi.kivilinna@xxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] x86: fix apic non-ISO code warnings
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 13 (crypto)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: asm/kvm_para.h from asm-generic (was: Re: linux-next: triage for April 19, 2012)
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: asm/kvm_para.h from asm-generic (was: Re: linux-next: triage for April 19, 2012)
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 13
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the leds tree
  • From: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the leds tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pci tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• asm/kvm_para.h from asm-generic (was: Re: linux-next: triage for April 19, 2012)
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2/2] drivers: usb: gadget: add multiple definition guards
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/2 RESEND] staging: usb: gadget: Configurable Composite Gadget depends on BLOCK
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pci tree related)
  • From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next] "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" commit
  • From: viresh kumar <viresh.kumar2@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next] "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" commit
  • From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• What is the right practice to get new code upstream( was Fwd: [patch] a simple hardware detector for latency as well as throughput ver. 0.1.0)
  • From: Luming Yu <luming.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next] "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" commit
  • From: viresh kumar <viresh.kumar2@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next] "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" commit
  • From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next] "clk: add non CONFIG_HAVE_CLK routines" commit
  • From: viresh kumar <viresh.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bluetooth tree with the wireless tree
  • From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jun 12
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (pci tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the bluetooth tree with the wireless tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] staging/comedi: fix build for USB not enabled
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] usb: add usb.h stubs for CONFIG_USB not enabled
  • From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Fwd: [patch] a simple hardware detector for latency as well as throughput ver. 0.1.0
  • From: Luming Yu <luming.yu@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] staging:iio:ad7298: Fix linker error due to missing IIO kfifo buffer
  • From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 2/2] drivers: usb: gadget: add multiple definition guards
  • From: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/2 RESEND] staging: usb: gadget: Configurable Composite Gadget depends on BLOCK
  • From: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/2] staging: usb: gadget: Configurable Composite Gadget depends on BLOCK
  • From: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: Tree for Jun 7 (staging/ccg #2)
  • From: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: no tree today
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: frontswap.v16 now in Linus tree, please stop pulling frontswap for linux-next
  • From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
• frontswap.v16 now in Linus tree, please stop pulling frontswap for linux-next
  • From: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] staging: comedi: das08: Reduce conditional compilation
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] staging: comedi: das08: Reduce conditional compilation
  • From: Ian Abbott <abbotti@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 8 (comedi/das08.c)
  • From: Ian Abbott <abbotti@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 8 (staging/iio)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 8 (comedi/das08.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>