Re: linux-next: manual merge of the input-mt tree with the input-current tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 10:19:05AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Henrik,
> 
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 11:57:14AM +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Hi Henrik,
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the input-mt tree got a conflict in
> > > drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c between commit 9b7e31bbf4bb
> > > ("Input: request threaded-only IRQs with IRQF_ONESHOT") from the
> > > input-current tree and commit c2ef9a1a248b ("Input: atmel_mxt_ts - use
> > > client name for irq") from the input-mt tree.
> > >
> > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
> > 
> > Looks good to me. Don't know if you need it for a merge, but:
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> 
> Hmm, maybe it is time I pull your tree?

By all means, I have nothing further planned for the merge window. I
wanted to wait until Linus pulls your current tree, then pull in the
merge conflict, then eventual reverts, then send you a pull
request. IOW, something like tomorrow. Sounds good?

Henrik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux