On Thursday 12 July 2012, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. > > Please check this and talk to each other ... > > I also noticed the bindings today [1]. They came in via a seperate > patch (suboptimal) which has no ack by a devicetree maintainer which I'd > really like to see here, because the bindings look suspicious to me. > They look like they mostly export register settings which is usually > questionable since we might want to abstract bindings so they can be > useful for a number of drivers. > > Arnd, since you committed the patches, can you please comment? I'd > prefer to drop this DT conversion for now, otherwise we might have to > support this possibly rushed bindings forever? LinusW, what do you > think? I've dropped the ux500/dt branch for now. and will wait for a new one to get submitted as a replacement. There were other things wrong with the submission that Lee already knows about, so I think it's better to do this the proper way now. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
