On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Paul, >> >> On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:40:36 +0900 Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> (adding Arnd to Cc, who I forgot to include previously) >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 12:06:06PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: >>> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:47:22AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> > > While building Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc >>> > > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: >>> > > >>> > > In file included from include/asm-generic/bug.h:5:0, >>> > > from arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h:127, >>> > > from arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.S:31: >>> > > include/linux/kernel.h:44:0: warning: "ALIGN" redefined [enabled by default] >>> > > include/linux/linkage.h:57:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition >>> > > include/linux/sysinfo.h: Assembler messages: >>> > > include/linux/sysinfo.h:7: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `struct' >>> > > include/linux/sysinfo.h:8: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `__kernel_long_t' >>> > > >>> > > And it went downhill from there :-( >>> > > >>> > > Caused by commit 3777808873b0 ("bug.h: need linux/kernel.h for >>> > > TAINT_WARN") which, unfortunately never made it into linux-next. >>> > > >>> > > I have reverted that commit for today (which presumably means that sh >>> > > builds will be broken again). >>> > >>> > I'm still unsure as to the best way to fix this, and there was no >>> > response to the original mail I posted about it either: >>> > >>> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=133879579014853&w=2 >>> > >>> > I'll fetch a powerpc cross compiler and see if I can figure out what went >>> > wrong. >>> > >>> Ok, it's because the asm-generic/bug.h __ASSEMBLY__ guarding is >>> completely bogus. This should hopefully fix it once and for all. >>> Sorry for the trouble. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Tested-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Can you create a proper commit message and send this to Linus, please? I >> have included it in my fixes tree in linux-next for today. >> > > Reference: commit 2a6f7f6bd7a9eb3c835c7e5a7d51b43675fb3881 ("fix > bug.h's inclusion of kernel.h") > Hope people don't treat this as nitpicking: I looked through the last commits to the involved file, all commits are labeled with "bug.h: ...", so follow the "rule"... "bug.h: Fix inclusion of kernel.h" > - Sedat - > > [1] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git;a=commitdiff;h=2a6f7f6bd7a9eb3c835c7e5a7d51b43675fb3881 > >> -- >> Cheers, >> Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html