On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:39:30AM +0530, Rajeev kumar wrote: > 3. We can pick the patches circulated by Viresh Kumar where we don't > have HAVE_CLK defined for x86_64, then the inline routines like > following should come into play: This is what *should* be happening, in conjunction with architectures doing the trivial work required to turn the clock API on now that there is a generic clock API, but both of these things seem to be going nowhere. I've applied a bodge until someone decides it's worth applying the stubs.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
