Hi Rafael,
I noticed commit b8eec56cd8e5 ("PM / cpuidle: System resume hang fix with
cpuidle") in the pm tree needs some work (I noticed it because it was
changed in a rebase ...).
diff --git a/include/linux/cpuidle.h b/include/linux/cpuidle.h
index a6b3f2e..b90ccb2 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpuidle.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpuidle.h
@@ -146,6 +146,8 @@ extern void cpuidle_unregister_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev);
extern void cpuidle_pause_and_lock(void);
extern void cpuidle_resume_and_unlock(void);
+extern void cpuidle_pause(void);
+extern void cpuidle_resume(void);
extern int cpuidle_enable_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev);
extern void cpuidle_disable_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev);
extern int cpuidle_wrap_enter(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
@@ -169,6 +171,8 @@ static inline void cpuidle_unregister_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev) { }
static inline void cpuidle_pause_and_lock(void) { }
static inline void cpuidle_resume_and_unlock(void) { }
+static inline cpuidle_pause(void) { }
+static inline cpuidle_resume(void) { }
These need to be "static inline void". I wonder what review and build
testing this went through (the above should produce warnings since they
are non void returning functions with no return statements).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgpbAIPZQ8AnT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
