On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 20:57:02 +0800 > Luming Yu <luming.yu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I need to know what the right practice is to get your attention to >> accept a new tool upstream like this one. > > Seems that you have some good feedback from Arnd to be looking at. I'm > usually the guy for mysterious misc stuff such as this, so please cc me > on future revisions. Andrew, Thanks a lot :-) The community is really helpful after find right people for right things. > > The name "hw_test" and "HW_TEST" is too vague. The topic "testing > hardware" is very broad, and this module only touches a small fraction > of it, so please think up a far more specific name. > I'm working on Version 2 of the tool which would be renamed to cpu_latency_test, or simply misc_latency_test? thanks!!! /l -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
