RE: ia64 dies in slab code on next-20120906

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Ok that would mean its not related to object arrangement within the page
> done by the allocator. How can a atomic_long value become misaligned?

It isn't just misaligned ... it is completely trashed. 0xca2ffc55fb373e95 isn't
any kind of valid address on ia64. I'm I little surprised that we didn't machine
check as we will have interpreted it as an uncacheable access to a non-existent
physical address.

-Tony


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux