On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 02:24:41PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in > net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c between commit 5cf02d09b50b ("nfs: skip commit in > releasepage if we're freeing memory for fs-related reasons") from the nfs > tree and commit "nfs: enable swap on NFS" from the akpm tree. > > Just context changes? I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry > the fix as necessary. Functionally it looks fine. As you say, it all looks like context changes. Arguably code like this current->flags &= ~PF_FSTRANS could use tsk_restore_flags instead() even though it should never be necessary as PF_FSTRANS would not be set on function entry. However, it would set up a depedency between the patch sets that is undesirable. If both sets get merged then it might make sense as a cleanup to use tsk_restore_flags() but not until then. Thanks Stephen. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html