Hi David,
On 07/25/2012 05:26 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 17:21 +0200, Gerlando Falauto wrote:
So could someone please spend a few words on what happened in the meantime?
To me it looks like the l2-mtd tree got rebased at some point, but I'm
quite at loss about this whole back-and-forth between trees.
I'm sure a few words could make my life much easier... :-)
There's no need to worry. The l2-mtd tree is rebased on top of the mtd
tree, and contains patches that Artem thinks I'm likely to accept.
I apply them, sometimes with a few minor changes, or I occasionally
reject them. Sometimes if Artem doesn't *immediately* update his tree
after I push changes to mine, a 'conflict' appears between the two. You
can ignore it.
thanks for your explanation.
So, is it correct to say that any patch contained within l2-mtd (but
*NOT* within linux-mtd) will eventually be killed? (Or rather,
*replaced* by the version eventually applied to linux-mtd)?
In other words, when you say "Artem updates his tree", it is technically
a rebase (so his version of a patch actually looks as if never existed),
right?
Thanks a lot!
Gerlando
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
