On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 17:36 +0200, Gerlando Falauto wrote: > > thanks for your explanation. > So, is it correct to say that any patch contained within l2-mtd (but > *NOT* within linux-mtd) will eventually be killed? (Or rather, > *replaced* by the version eventually applied to linux-mtd)? Usually, yes. It'll either get applied in some form or other to the linux-mtd tree, or on the infrequent occasions that Artem merges something that I object to, the author will get an email from me explaining *why* it wasn't applied. Sometimes I *do* just pull everything from Artem's tree, but usually I don't. > In other words, when you say "Artem updates his tree", it is > technically a rebase (so his version of a patch actually looks as if > never existed), right? Yes. -- dwmw2
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
