On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:43:59 -0700, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 08/19/2012 07:51 PM, Rusty Russell wrote: > > > On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:41:42 -0700, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 08/14/2012 08:17 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > >> > >>> Am 14.08.2012 17:15, schrieb David Howells: > >>>> How about this then? > >>>> > >>>> David > >>>> --- > >>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig > >>>> index 9926e11..a4b0c10 100644 > >>>> --- a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig > >>>> +++ b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig > >>>> @@ -21,9 +21,11 @@ config 64BIT > >>>> config X86_32 > >>>> def_bool !64BIT > >>>> select HAVE_AOUT > >>>> + select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL > >>>> > >>>> config X86_64 > >>>> def_bool 64BIT > >>>> + select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA > >>>> > >>>> config RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM > >>>> def_bool X86_XADD && 64BIT > >>> > >>> Looks sane. > >>> > >>> Acked-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx> > >> > >> > >> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Thanks, folded into David's original patch. > > > When will this be fixed in linux-next? > > linux-next of 20120821 still fails. Should be in latest, ie. 20120822. Cheers, Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
