On 08/19/2012 07:51 PM, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:41:42 -0700, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 08/14/2012 08:17 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> >>> Am 14.08.2012 17:15, schrieb David Howells: >>>> How about this then? >>>> >>>> David >>>> --- >>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig >>>> index 9926e11..a4b0c10 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig >>>> +++ b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig >>>> @@ -21,9 +21,11 @@ config 64BIT >>>> config X86_32 >>>> def_bool !64BIT >>>> select HAVE_AOUT >>>> + select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL >>>> >>>> config X86_64 >>>> def_bool 64BIT >>>> + select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA >>>> >>>> config RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM >>>> def_bool X86_XADD && 64BIT >>> >>> Looks sane. >>> >>> Acked-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx> >> >> >> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks, folded into David's original patch. When will this be fixed in linux-next? linux-next of 20120821 still fails. thanks, -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
