Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 14.08.2012 16:26, schrieb David Howells:
> Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>>>   CC      arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.o
>>>> arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.c:96:5: error: redefinition of 'apply_relocate_add'
>>>> include/linux/moduleloader.h:64:19: note: previous definition of 'apply_relocate_add' was here
>>>> make[2]: *** [arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.o] Error 1
> 
> Hmmm...  I'm not sure how to deal with this.  The problem is that UML doesn't
> draw the:
> 
> 	select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL if X86_32
> 	select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA if X86_64
> 
> definitions from arch/foo/Kconfig that tell it what modules will look like.
> 
> Should I just enable both REL and RELA in UML, or is there a better way to do
> this?

Is there no way to get this information from the UML subarch?
Which is currently X86_32 or X86_64.

Thanks,
//richard

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux