On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 05:11:08PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 09/05/2012 05:06 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > Somone already sent this. As ever please try to use subject lines > > appropriate for the subsystem. Please also consider who you're CCing - > Unfortunately the MAINTAINERS file does not tell me what to include > in the $subject line for the subsystem. > What would you like to see there, please? Maybe ASoC? As with every other subsystem in the kernel look at the log for the thing your changing and do something that visually resembles it. If you want get_maintainers to do this for you you'll need to write the code (or convince someone else to do it). > > there's no need to copy -next on things like this which aren't > I have always done a reply-to-all for linux-next patches, so after > a few years someone days Don't Do That (IYO). I'm pretty sure I've mentioned this before... actually, if you're relying on get_maintainers that's probably some of the false positives too. If you've found an issue related to the -next integration that's one thing but if you've just noticed a random thing in the kernel that could be improved that's not really something about -next. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
