Hi Greg, On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 20:53:54, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 08:36:05PM +0530, AnilKumar Ch wrote: > > Regulator platform data handling was mistakenly added to MFD > > driver. So we will see build errors if we compile MFD drivers > > without CONFIG_REGULATOR. This patch moves regulator platform > > data handling from TPS65217 MFD driver to regulator driver. > > > > This makes MFD driver independent of REGULATOR framework so > > build error is fixed if CONFIG_REGULATOR is not set. > > > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `tps65217_probe': > > tps65217.c:(.devinit.text+0x13e37): undefined reference > > to `of_regulator_match' > > > > This patch also fix allocation size of tps65217 platform data. > > Current implementation allocates a struct tps65217_board for each > > regulator specified in the device tree. But the structure itself > > provides array of regulators so one instance of it is sufficient. > > > > Signed-off-by: AnilKumar Ch <anilkumar@xxxxxx> > > --- > > This patch is tested on BeagleBone with regulator device node > > additions. And this is based on mfd/master. > > <formletter> > > This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the > stable kernel tree. Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt > for how to do this properly. > My bad, I will take care from next time onwards. Thanks AnilKumar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
