Hi Randy On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:19:59AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 07/24/2012 09:30 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Changes since 20120724: > > > > > > The mfd tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. > > > > on i386 and x86_64: > > CONFIG_MFD_ARIZONA=y > CONFIG_MFD_ARIZONA_I2C=m > CONFIG_MFD_CORE=m > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `arizona_dev_init': > (.devinit.text+0x3ab0): undefined reference to `mfd_add_devices' > drivers/built-in.o: In function `arizona_dev_init': > (.devinit.text+0x3fdc): undefined reference to `mfd_add_devices' > drivers/built-in.o: In function `arizona_dev_init': > (.devinit.text+0x3fff): undefined reference to `mfd_add_devices' > drivers/built-in.o: In function `arizona_dev_init': > (.devinit.text+0x4059): undefined reference to `mfd_remove_devices' > drivers/built-in.o: In function `arizona_dev_exit': > (.devexit.text+0x9): undefined reference to `mfd_remove_devices' > > because MFD_ARIZONA is bool, so builtin, while MFD_CORE=m, > so the builtin code cannot call the loadable module code. This is fixed now, by having MFD_ARIZONA selecting MFD_CORE. Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
