On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 09:39 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 01:59:47PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in
> > kernel/sched/core.c between commit f319da0c6894 ("sched: Fix load avg vs
> > cpu-hotplug") from the tip tree and commit ead504e5600e ("sched: Fix load
> > avg vs cpu-hotplug") from the rcu tree.
> >
> > These are 2 slightly different versions of the same patch :-( Same author
> > time, different commit times ... The rcu tree version contains this
> > extra bit in the commit message:
> >
> > " [ paulmck: Move call to calc_load_migration to CPU_DEAD to avoid
> > miscounting noted by Rakib. ]"
> >
> > So I used it. Let me know if this is not correct.
>
> My guess is that Peter Zijlstra will replace my version at some point,
> at which point I will drop mine. But from what I can see, the version
> currently in -tip is the older version, so I will keep mine until
> -tip updates.
Yeah, that was a fail on my part. I'll go sort it after dinner.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
