Linux S390: System z9 mainframe
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: force bp isolation for VSIE
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v3 04/16] s390/mm: add gmap PMD invalidation notification
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: force bp isolation for VSIE
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: force bp isolation for VSIE
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: force bp isolation for VSIE
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: force bp isolation for VSIE
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/17] Add kexec_file_load support to s390
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: samples/seccomp/ broken when cross compiling s390, ppc allyesconfig
- From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] small optimizations for exitless interrupts
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] KVM: s390: force bp isolation for VSIE
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] Kconfig : Remove HAS_IOMEM dependency for Graphics support
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 00/17] Add kexec_file_load support to s390
- From: Dave Young <dyoung@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] headers: untangle kmemleak.h from mm.h
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: samples/seccomp/ broken when cross compiling s390, ppc allyesconfig
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] headers: untangle kmemleak.h from mm.h
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: s390: do not set intervention requests for GISA interrupts
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: s390: optimize wakeup for exitless interrupts
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v3 04/16] s390/mm: add gmap PMD invalidation notification
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v3 04/16] s390/mm: add gmap PMD invalidation notification
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v3 04/16] s390/mm: add gmap PMD invalidation notification
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v3 03/16] s390/mm: Introduce gmap_pmdp_xchg
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v3 04/16] s390/mm: add gmap PMD invalidation notification
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v3 02/16] s390/mm: Abstract gmap notify bit setting
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v3 03/16] s390/mm: Introduce gmap_pmdp_xchg
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v3 02/16] s390/mm: Abstract gmap notify bit setting
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v3 01/16] s390/mm: make gmap_protect_range more modular
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: s390: do not set intervention requests for GISA interrupts
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: s390: optimize wakeup for exitless interrupts
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] small optimizations for exitless interrupts
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] KVM: s390: do not set intervention requests for GISA interrupts
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] KVM: s390: optimize wakeup for exitless interrupts
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: samples/seccomp/ broken when cross compiling s390, ppc allyesconfig
- From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: samples/seccomp/ broken when cross compiling s390, ppc allyesconfig
- From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] headers: untangle kmemleak.h from mm.h
- From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: samples/seccomp/ broken when cross compiling s390, ppc allyesconfig
- From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: samples/seccomp/ broken when cross compiling s390, ppc allyesconfig
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: samples/seccomp/ broken when cross compiling s390, ppc allyesconfig
- From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] headers: untangle kmemleak.h from mm.h
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] headers: untangle kmemleak.h from mm.h
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- samples/seccomp/ broken when cross compiling s390, ppc allyesconfig
- From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] headers: untangle kmemleak.h from mm.h
- From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 14/17] s390/kexec_file: Add kexec_file_load system call
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 14/17] s390/kexec_file: Add kexec_file_load system call
- From: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 01/17] kexec_file: Silence compile warnings
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 04/17] kexec_file: Search symbols in read-only kexec_purgatory
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 00/17] Add kexec_file_load support to s390
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 05/17] kexec_file: Use read-only sections in arch_kexec_apply_relocations*
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 06/17] kexec_file: Split up __kexec_load_puragory
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 07/17] kexec_file: Simplify kexec_purgatory_setup_sechdrs 1
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 08/17] kexec_file: Simplify kexec_purgatory_setup_sechdrs 2
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 10/17] kexec_file: Allow archs to set purgatory load address
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 11/17] kexec_file: Move purgatories sha256 to common code
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 09/17] kexec_file: Remove mis-use of sh_offset field
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 12/17] s390/kexec_file: Prepare setup.h for kexec_file_load
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 15/17] s390/kexec_file: Add image loader
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 13/17] s390/kexec_file: Add purgatory
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 16/17] s390/kexec_file: Add crash support to image loader
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 14/17] s390/kexec_file: Add kexec_file_load system call
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 17/17] s390/kexec_file: Add ELF loader
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 02/17] kexec_file: Remove checks in kexec_purgatory_load
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 03/17] kexec_file: Make purgatory_info->ehdr const
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PULL v2 1/1] virtio/s390: implement PM operations for virtio_ccw
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] headers: untangle kmemleak.h from mm.h
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] headers: untangle kmemleak.h from mm.h
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Kevin Easton <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net 0/2] s390/qeth: fixes 2018-02-09
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] s390 updates for 4.16 merge window
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net 1/2] s390/qeth: fix underestimated count of buffer elements
- From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net 2/2] s390/qeth: fix SETIP command handling
- From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net 0/2] s390/qeth: fixes 2018-02-09
- From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC/PATCH v3 08/16] s390/mm: Make protect_rmap EDAT1 compatible
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC/PATCH v3 00/16] KVM/s390: Hugetlbfs enablement
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC/PATCH v3 01/16] s390/mm: make gmap_protect_range more modular
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC/PATCH v3 16/16] s390/mm: Add gmap lock classes
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC/PATCH v3 09/16] s390/mm: Add shadow segment code
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC/PATCH v3 10/16] s390/mm: Add VSIE reverse fake case
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC/PATCH v3 12/16] s390/mm: clear huge page storage keys on enable_skey
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC/PATCH v3 15/16] KVM: s390: Add KVM HPAGE capability
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC/PATCH v3 14/16] s390/mm: hugetlb pages within a gmap can not be freed
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC/PATCH v3 13/16] s390/mm: Add huge pmd storage key handling
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC/PATCH v3 11/16] s390/mm: Enable gmap huge pmd support
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC/PATCH v3 07/16] s390/mm: Make gmap_read_table EDAT1 compatible
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC/PATCH v3 05/16] s390/mm: Add gmap pmd invalidation and clearing
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC/PATCH v3 06/16] s390/mm: Add huge page dirty sync support
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC/PATCH v3 04/16] s390/mm: add gmap PMD invalidation notification
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC/PATCH v3 03/16] s390/mm: Introduce gmap_pmdp_xchg
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC/PATCH v3 02/16] s390/mm: Abstract gmap notify bit setting
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 7/7] Test stackprotector options in Kconfig to kill CC_STACKPROTECTOR_AUTO
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 7/7] Test stackprotector options in Kconfig to kill CC_STACKPROTECTOR_AUTO
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 5/7] kconfig: invoke silentoldconfig when compiler is updated
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] Kconfig: add new special property shell= to test compiler options in Kconfig
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 5/7] kconfig: invoke silentoldconfig when compiler is updated
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] Kconfig: add new special property shell= to test compiler options in Kconfig
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] s390: introduce execute-trampolines for branches
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] Kconfig: add new special property shell= to test compiler options in Kconfig
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 0/7] Kconfig: add new special property shell= to test compiler options in Kconfig
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 6/7] kconfig: add basic environments to evaluate C flags in Kconfig
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 1/7] kbuild: remove kbuild cache
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 2/7] kconfig: add xrealloc() helper
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 5/7] kconfig: invoke silentoldconfig when compiler is updated
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 3/7] kconfig: remove const qualifier from sym_expand_string_value()
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 4/7] kconfig: support new special property shell=
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 7/7] Test stackprotector options in Kconfig to kill CC_STACKPROTECTOR_AUTO
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] Kconfig : Remove HAS_IOMEM dependency for Graphics support
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] Kconfig : Remove HAS_IOMEM dependency for Graphics support
- From: Farhan Ali <alifm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] PCI: Add SPDX GPL-2.0+ to replace implicit GPL v2 or later statement
- From: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] PCI: Add SPDX tag for s390_pci_hpc.c
- From: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] Kconfig : Remove HAS_IOMEM dependency for Graphics support
- From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 4/6] KVM: s390: consider epoch index on TOD clock syncs
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] perf s390: Rework system call table creation by using syscall.tbl
- From: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] perf s390: Grab a copy of arch/s390/kernel/syscall/syscall.tbl
- From: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] Revert "tools include s390: Grab a copy of arch/s390/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h"
- From: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] perf s390: Use syscall.tbl to create the perf syscall table
- From: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1] KVM: s390: use switch vs jump table in interrupt.c
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: s390: avoid jump tables
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: s390: avoid jump tables
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1] KVM: s390: use switch vs jump table in interrupt.c
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1] KVM: s390: use switch vs jump table in interrupt.c
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1] KVM: s390: use switch vs jump table in interrupt.c
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: s390: avoid jump tables
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: s390: use switch vs jump table in priv.c
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: s390: avoid jump tables
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: s390: avoid jump tables
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: s390: use switch vs jump table in intercept.c
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1] KVM: s390: use switch vs jump table in interrupt.c
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1] KVM: s390: use switch vs jump table in interrupt.c
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: s390: use switch vs jump table in priv.c
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] s390: introduce execute-trampolines for branches
- From: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] s390: introduce execute-trampolines for branches
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] s390: introduce execute-trampolines for branches
- From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 4/6] KVM: s390: consider epoch index on TOD clock syncs
- From: "Collin L. Walling" <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 2/6] KVM: s390: provide only a single function for setting the tod
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 4/6] KVM: s390: consider epoch index on TOD clock syncs
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 2/6] KVM: s390: provide only a single function for setting the tod
- From: "Collin L. Walling" <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 2/6] KVM: s390: provide only a single function for setting the tod
- From: "Collin L. Walling" <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 4/6] KVM: s390: consider epoch index on TOD clock syncs
- From: "Collin L. Walling" <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1] KVM: s390: use switch vs jump table in interrupt.c
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] s390: introduce execute-trampolines for branches
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 1/6] KVM: s390: take care of clock-comparator sign control
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 1/6] KVM: s390: take care of clock-comparator sign control
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 1/6] KVM: s390: take care of clock-comparator sign control
- From: "Collin L. Walling" <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] s390: introduce execute-trampolines for branches
- From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] s390: introduce execute-trampolines for branches
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] s390: introduce execute-trampolines for branches
- From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] s390: introduce execute-trampolines for branches
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 0/6] KVM: s390: Multiple-epoch facility fixes
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/6] s390: add options to change branch prediction behaviour for the kernel
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC 6/6] KVM: s390: generalize kvm_s390_get_tod_clock_ext()
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC 5/6] KVM: s390: no need to inititalize kvm->arch members to 0
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC 3/6] KVM: s390: consider epoch index on hotplugged CPUs
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC 4/6] KVM: s390: consider epoch index on TOD clock syncs
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC 2/6] KVM: s390: provide only a single function for setting the tod
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC 1/6] KVM: s390: take care of clock-comparator sign control
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH RFC 0/6] KVM: s390: Multiple-epoch facility fixes
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] s390: introduce execute-trampolines for branches
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/6] s390: add options to change branch prediction behaviour for the kernel
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/6] s390: scrub registers on kernel entry and KVM exit
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/6] s390/alternative: use a copy of the facility bit mask
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/6] s390: add options to change branch prediction behaviour for the kernel
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/6] s390: run user space and KVM guests with modified branch prediction
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/6] s390: add optimized array_index_mask_nospec
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 6/6] s390: introduce execute-trampolines for branches
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/6] s390: improve speculative execution handling v3
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: take care of clock-comparator sign control
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: take care of clock-comparator sign control
- From: "Collin L. Walling" <walling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1] KVM: s390: use switch vs jump table in interrupt.c
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v1] KVM: s390: use switch vs jump table in interrupt.c
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: s390: use switch vs jump table in intercept.c
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: s390: use switch vs jump table in intercept.c
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: s390: avoid jump tables
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: s390: avoid jump tables
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] Kconfig : Remove HAS_IOMEM dependency for Graphics support
- From: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: s390: use switch vs jump table in intercept.c
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: s390: use switch vs jump table in priv.c
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: s390: avoid jump tables
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: s390: use switch vs jump table in intercept.c
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: s390: use switch vs jump table in intercept.c
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: s390: use switch vs jump table in priv.c
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] KVM: s390: use switch vs jump table in priv.c
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] KVM: s390: use switch vs jump table in intercept.c
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] KVM: s390: avoid jump tables
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: take care of clock-comparator sign control
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: take care of clock-comparator sign control
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: take care of clock-comparator sign control
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: take care of clock-comparator sign control
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 08/20] s390/kconfig: Remove ARCH_WANTS_PROT_NUMA_PROT_NONE select
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 08/20] s390/kconfig: Remove ARCH_WANTS_PROT_NUMA_PROT_NONE select
- From: Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 22/34] dma-mapping: add an arch_dma_supported hook
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 09/17] kexec_file: Remove mis-use of sh_offset field
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 11/17] kexec_file: Move purgatories sha256 to common code
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 13/17] s390/kexec_file: Add purgatory
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 06/17] kexec_file: Split up __kexec_load_puragory
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 15/17] s390/kexec_file: Add image loader
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 16/17] s390/kexec_file: Add crash support to image loader
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 14/17] s390/kexec_file: Add kexec_file_load system call
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 17/17] s390/kexec_file: Add ELF loader
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 12/17] s390/kexec_file: Prepare setup.h for kexec_file_load
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 10/17] kexec_file: Allow archs to set purgatory load address
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 01/17] kexec_file: Silence compile warnings
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 04/17] kexec_file: Search symbols in read-only kexec_purgatory
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 08/17] kexec_file: Simplify kexec_purgatory_setup_sechdrs 2
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 03/17] kexec_file: Make purgatory_info->ehdr const
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 02/17] kexec_file: Remove checks in kexec_purgatory_load
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 07/17] kexec_file: Simplify kexec_purgatory_setup_sechdrs 1
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 05/17] kexec_file: Use read-only sections in arch_kexec_apply_relocations*
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 00/17] Add kexec_file_load support to s390
- From: Philipp Rudo <prudo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] Kconfig : Remove HAS_IOMEM dependency for Graphics support
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/3] Kconfig : Remove HAS_IOMEM dependency for Graphics support
- From: Farhan Ali <alifm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/3] s390/char : Rename EBCDIC keymap variables
- From: Farhan Ali <alifm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 3/3] s390/setup : enable display support for KVM guest
- From: Farhan Ali <alifm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/3]Enable CONFIG_VT support for S390
- From: Farhan Ali <alifm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PULL 0/3] KVM: s390: maintainers update
- From: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [man-pages PATCH 2/5] s390_runtime_instr.2: document the removal of the second argument
- From: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [man-pages PATCH 2/5] s390_runtime_instr.2: document the removal of the second argument
- From: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PULL 2/3] MAINTAINERS: add Halil as additional vfio-ccw maintainer
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PULL 3/3] MAINTAINERS: update KVM/s390 maintainers
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PULL 1/3] MAINTAINERS: add David as a reviewer for KVM/s390
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PULL 0/3] KVM: s390: maintainers update
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [man-pages PATCH 2/5] s390_runtime_instr.2: document the removal of the second argument
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [man-pages PATCH 2/5] s390_runtime_instr.2: document the removal of the second argument
- From: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] MAINTAINERS: add David as a reviewer for KVM/s390
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [man-pages PATCH 2/5] s390_runtime_instr.2: document the removal of the second argument
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] s390 patches for the 4.15 merge window
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] MAINTAINERS: add Halil as additional vfio-ccw maintainer
- From: Dong Jia Shi <bjsdjshi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] MAINTAINERS: add Halil as additional vfio-ccw maintainer
- From: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] MAINTAINERS: update KVM/s390 maintainers
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/3] MAINTAINERS: add Halil as additional vfio-ccw maintainer
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] MAINTAINERS: add David as a reviewer for KVM/s390
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL 00/22] KVM: s390: Fixes and features for 4.16 part 2
- From: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: s390: update maintainers
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] MAINTAINERS: update KVM/s390 maintainers
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] MAINTAINERS: add Halil as additional vfio-ccw maintainer
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] MAINTAINERS: add David as a reviewer for KVM/s390
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] KVM: s390: update maintainers
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] Kconfig changes to enable Graphics Support for S390
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] PCI: Add SPDX GPL-2.0+ to replace implicit GPL v2 or later statement
- From: Sebastian Ott <sebott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] mm: s390: Only notify on 4k pages
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] PCI: Add SPDX GPL-2.0+ to replace implicit GPL v2 or later statement
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] vfio: ccw: basic channel path event handling
- From: Dong Jia Shi <bjsdjshi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] vfio: ccw: basic channel path event handling
- From: Dong Jia Shi <bjsdjshi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] PCI: Add SPDX GPL-2.0+ to replace implicit GPL v2 or later statement
- From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] PCI: Add SPDX tag for s390_pci_hpc.c
- From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Avoiding information leaks between users and between processes by default? [Was: : [PATCH 1/5] prctl: add PR_ISOLATE_BP process control]
- From: Alan Cox <gnomes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Avoiding information leaks between users and between processes by default? [Was: : [PATCH 1/5] prctl: add PR_ISOLATE_BP process control]
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] Kconfig changes to enable Graphics Support for S390
- From: Farhan Ali <alifm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] net/smc: return booleans instead of integers
- From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@xxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 02/22] KVM: s390: vsie: use READ_ONCE to access some SCB fields
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 06/22] KVM: s390: add vcpu stat counters for many instruction
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 17/22] KVM: s390: abstract adapter interruption word generation from ISC
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 03/22] KVM: s390: vsie: store guest addresses of satellite blocks in vsie_page
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 07/22] KVM: s390: rename __set_cpuflag() to kvm_s390_set_cpuflags()
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 15/22] s390/css: indicate the availability of the AIV facility
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 10/22] KVM: s390: introduce and use kvm_s390_test_cpuflags()
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 08/22] KVM: s390: reuse kvm_s390_set_cpuflags()
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 05/22] KVM: s390: diagnoses are instructions as well
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 12/22] KVM: s390: define GISA format-0 data structure
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 18/22] KVM: s390: add GISA interrupts to FLIC ioctl interface
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 13/22] s390/bitops: add test_and_clear_bit_inv()
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 14/22] KVM: s390: implement GISA IPM related primitives
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 19/22] KVM: s390: make kvm_s390_get_io_int() aware of GISA
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 16/22] KVM: s390: exploit GISA and AIV for emulated interrupts
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 22/22] KVM: s390: introduce the format-1 GISA
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 21/22] s390/sclp: expose the GISA format facility
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 20/22] KVM: s390: activate GISA for emulated interrupts
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 09/22] KVM: s390: introduce and use kvm_s390_clear_cpuflags()
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 11/22] KVM: s390: reverse bit ordering of irqs in pending mask
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 01/22] s390/mm: Remove superfluous parameter
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 04/22] s390x/mm: simplify gmap_protect_rmap()
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 00/22] KVM: s390: Fixes and features for 4.16 part 2
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] net/smc: fixes 2018-01-26
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] Kconfig changes to enable Graphics Support for S390
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] Kconfig changes to enable Graphics Support for S390
- From: Farhan Ali <alifm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] fbdev: Kconfig: Add HAS_IOMEM dependency for FB_OPENCORES
- From: Farhan Ali <alifm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] Kconfig changes to enable Graphics Support for S390
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] KVM: s390: make kvm_s390_get_io_int() aware of GISA
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] fbdev: Kconfig: Add HAS_IOMEM dependency for FB_OPENCORES
- From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] fbdev: Kconfig: Add HAS_IOMEM dependency for FB_OPENCORES
- From: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] Kconfig : Remove HAS_IOMEM dependency for Graphics support
- From: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] KVM: s390: make kvm_s390_get_io_int() aware of GISA
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] KVM: s390: make kvm_s390_get_io_int() aware of GISA
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] KVM: s390: make kvm_s390_get_io_int() aware of GISA
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] mm: s390: Only notify on 4k pages
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: s390: Only notify on 4k pages
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] KVM: s390: make kvm_s390_get_io_int() aware of GISA
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: s390: introduce the format-1 GISA
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 11/12] s390/sclp: expose the GISA format facility
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 10/12] KVM: s390: activate GISA for emulated interrupts
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 09/12] KVM: s390: make kvm_s390_get_io_int() aware of GISA
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 08/12] KVM: s390: add GISA interrupts to FLIC ioctl interface
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 06/12] KVM: s390: exploit GISA and AIV for emulated interrupts
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 04/12] KVM: s390: implement GISA IPM related primitives
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] KVM: s390: define GISA format-0 data structure
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next 1/5] net/smc: handle device, port, and QP error events
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next 2/5] net/smc: smc_poll improvements
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next 4/5] net/smc: release clcsock from tcp_listen_worker
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next 3/5] net/smc: replace sock_put worker by socket refcounting
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next 5/5] net/smc: return booleans instead of integers
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next 0/5] net/smc: fixes 2018-01-26
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 10/12] KVM: s390: activate GISA for emulated interrupts
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] net/smc: more socket closing improvements
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 10/12] KVM: s390: activate GISA for emulated interrupts
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 07/12] KVM: s390: abstract adapter interruption word generation from ISC
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 06/12] KVM: s390: exploit GISA and AIV for emulated interrupts
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3 04/12] KVM: s390: implement GISA IPM related primitives
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 07/12] KVM: s390: abstract adapter interruption word generation from ISC
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 06/12] KVM: s390: exploit GISA and AIV for emulated interrupts
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3] KVM: s390: exitless interrupt support for KVM
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 10/12] KVM: s390: activate GISA for emulated interrupts
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3 04/12] KVM: s390: implement GISA IPM related primitives
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: s390: introduce the format-1 GISA
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: s390: introduce the format-1 GISA
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] KVM: s390: exploit GISA and AIV for emulated interrupts
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] KVM: s390: exploit GISA and AIV for emulated interrupts
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: s390: introduce the format-1 GISA
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] KVM: s390: exploit GISA and AIV for emulated interrupts
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] KVM: s390: exploit GISA and AIV for emulated interrupts
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: s390: introduce the format-1 GISA
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: s390: introduce the format-1 GISA
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: s390: introduce the format-1 GISA
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: s390: Only notify on 4k pages
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v1 0/2] Kconfig changes to enable Graphics Support for S390
- From: Farhan Ali <alifm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: s390: introduce the format-1 GISA
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v1 2/2] fbdev: Kconfig: Add HAS_IOMEM dependency for FB_OPENCORES
- From: Farhan Ali <alifm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v1 1/2] Kconfig : Remove HAS_IOMEM dependency for Graphics support
- From: Farhan Ali <alifm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: s390: introduce the format-1 GISA
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] mm: s390: Only notify on 4k pages
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] mm: s390: Rename gmap_pte_op_fixup
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] Huge page pte protection
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: s390: introduce the format-1 GISA
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] KVM: s390: exploit GISA and AIV for emulated interrupts
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] KVM: s390: exploit GISA and AIV for emulated interrupts
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 05/12] s390/css: expose the AIV facility
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] KVM: s390: exploit GISA and AIV for emulated interrupts
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 19/22] s390/mm: Split huge pages if granular protection is needed
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] KVM: s390: exploit GISA and AIV for emulated interrupts
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] KVM: s390: exploit GISA and AIV for emulated interrupts
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 19/22] s390/mm: Split huge pages if granular protection is needed
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] KVM: s390: exploit GISA and AIV for emulated interrupts
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL 0/1] KVM: s390: another fix for 4.15 (via kvm/master)
- From: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] KVM: s390: implement GISA IPM related primitives
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] KVM: s390: exploit GISA and AIV for emulated interrupts
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] KVM: s390: implement GISA IPM related primitives
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] KVM: s390: define GISA format-0 data structure
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] KVM: s390: reverse bit ordering of irqs in pending mask
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 05/12] s390/css: indicate the availability of the AIV facility
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 11/12] s390/sclp: expose the GISA format facility
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 05/12] s390/css: indicate the availability of the AIV facility
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] s390/bitops: add test_and_clear_bit_inv()
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 03/12] s390/bitops: add test_and_clear_bit_inv()
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 01/12] KVM: s390: reverse bit ordering of irqs in pending mask
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 08/12] KVM: s390: add GISA interrupts to FLIC ioctl interface
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 10/12] KVM: s390: activate GISA for emulated interrupts
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 09/12] KVM: s390: make kvm_s390_get_io_int() aware of GISA
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 07/12] KVM: s390: abstract adapter interruption word generation from ISC
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 05/12] s390/css: indicate the availability of the AIV facility
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 06/12] KVM: s390: exploit GISA and AIV for emulated interrupts
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: s390: introduce the format-1 GISA
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 11/12] s390/sclp: expose the GISA format facility
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 04/12] KVM: s390: implement GISA IPM related primitives
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 02/12] KVM: s390: define GISA format-0 data structure
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 00/12] KVM: s390: exitless interrupt support for KVM
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] vfio: ccw: basic channel path event handling
- From: Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 13/15] livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 13/15] livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 05/12] s390/css: expose the AIV facility
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 05/12] s390/css: expose the AIV facility
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 05/12] s390/css: expose the AIV facility
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] vfio: ccw: basic channel path event handling
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 13/15] livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 13/15] livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model
- From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next 3/6] net/smc: terminate link group for ib_post_send problems
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next 1/6] net/smc: cancel tx worker in case of socket aborts
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next 2/6] net/smc: handle state SMC_PEERFINCLOSEWAIT correctly
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next 5/6] net/smc: wake up wr_reg_wait when terminating a link group
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next 6/6] net/smc: check for healthy link group resp. connections
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next 4/6] net/smc: do not reuse a linkgroup with setup problems
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next 0/6] net/smc: more socket closing improvements
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] perf trace: Introduce arch-specific errno code/name mappings
- From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 13/15] livepatch: change to a per-task consistency model
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] perf trace: Introduce arch-specific errno code/name mappings
- From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 19/22] s390/mm: Split huge pages if granular protection is needed
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Avoiding information leaks between users and between processes by default? [Was: : [PATCH 1/5] prctl: add PR_ISOLATE_BP process control]
- From: Alan Cox <gnomes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Avoiding information leaks between users and between processes by default? [Was: : [PATCH 1/5] prctl: add PR_ISOLATE_BP process control]
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] KVM: s390: refactor cpuflag handling
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] KVM: s390: introduce and use kvm_s390_test_cpuflags()
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] KVM: s390: introduce and use kvm_s390_clear_cpuflags()
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] KVM: s390: reuse kvm_s390_set_cpuflags()
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] KVM: s390: rename __set_cpuflag() to kvm_s390_set_cpuflags()
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: add vcpu stat counters for many instruction
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: add vcpu stat counters for many instruction
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] net/smc: socket closing improvements
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: add vcpu stat counters for many instruction
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Avoiding information leaks between users and between processes by default? [Was: : [PATCH 1/5] prctl: add PR_ISOLATE_BP process control]
- From: Alan Cox <gnomes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: s390: add vcpu stat counters for many instruction
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: s390: add vcpu stat counters for many instruction
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: s390: diagnoses are instructions as well
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 1/1] KVM: s390: add proper locking for CMMA migration bitmap
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 0/1] KVM: s390: another fix for 4.15 (via kvm/master)
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: s390: add vcpu stat counters for many instruction
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: add proper locking for CMMA migration bitmap
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: add proper locking for CMMA migration bitmap
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 05/22] s390/mm: hugetlb pages within a gmap can not be freed
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 05/22] s390/mm: hugetlb pages within a gmap can not be freed
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: add proper locking for CMMA migration bitmap
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1] s390x/mm: simplify gmap_protect_rmap()
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: add proper locking for CMMA migration bitmap
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: add proper locking for CMMA migration bitmap
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: s390: diagnoses are instructions as well
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: add proper locking for CMMA migration bitmap
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: add proper locking for CMMA migration bitmap
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: s390: diagnoses are instructions as well
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: add proper locking for CMMA migration bitmap
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Avoiding information leaks between users and between processes by default? [Was: : [PATCH 1/5] prctl: add PR_ISOLATE_BP process control]
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/3] s390: documentation update
- From: Sebastian Ott <sebott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: s390: diagnoses are instructions as well
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: s390: diagnoses are instructions as well
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: s390: add vcpu stat counters for many instruction
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: add proper locking for CMMA migration bitmap
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: s390: add vcpu stat counters for many instruction
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: s390: add vcpu stat counters for many instruction
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1] s390x/mm: simplify gmap_protect_rmap()
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/5] s390: define ISOLATE_BP to run tasks with modified branch prediction
- From: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/2] KVM: s390: kvm stat counters rework
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] KVM: s390: add vcpu stat counters for many instruction
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] KVM: s390: diagnoses are instructions as well
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Avoiding information leaks between users and between processes by default? [Was: : [PATCH 1/5] prctl: add PR_ISOLATE_BP process control]
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL 00/43] perf/core improvements and changes
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next 0/6] net/smc: socket closing improvements
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next 3/6] net/smc: get rid of tx_pend waits in socket closing
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next 2/6] net/smc: simplify function smc_clcsock_accept()
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next 1/6] net/smc: use local struct sock variables consistently
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next 6/6] net/smc: continue waiting if peer signals write_shutdown
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next 5/6] net/smc: improve state change handling after close wait
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH net-next 4/6] net/smc: make wait for work request uninterruptible
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Avoiding information leaks between users and between processes by default? [Was: : [PATCH 1/5] prctl: add PR_ISOLATE_BP process control]
- From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 00/22] KVM/s390: Hugetlbfs enablement
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 00/22] KVM/s390: Hugetlbfs enablement
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 05/99] xarray: Add definition of struct xarray
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Avoiding information leaks between users and between processes by default? [Was: : [PATCH 1/5] prctl: add PR_ISOLATE_BP process control]
- From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] prctl: add PR_ISOLATE_BP process control
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/5] s390: define ISOLATE_BP to run tasks with modified branch prediction
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] prctl: add PR_ISOLATE_BP process control
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v1] s390x/mm: simplify gmap_protect_rmap()
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 00/22] KVM/s390: Hugetlbfs enablement
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/5] s390: define ISOLATE_BP to run tasks with modified branch prediction
- From: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] KVM: s390: introduce and use kvm_s390_test_cpuflags()
- From: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] KVM: s390: introduce and use kvm_s390_clear_cpuflags()
- From: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] KVM: s390: reuse kvm_s390_set_cpuflags()
- From: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] KVM: s390: rename __set_cpuflag() to kvm_s390_set_cpuflags()
- From: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] s390/cmf: fix kerneldoc
- From: Sebastian Ott <sebott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] prctl: add PR_ISOLATE_BP process control
- From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v1 4/4] KVM: s390: introduce and use kvm_s390_test_cpuflags()
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v1 3/4] KVM: s390: introduce and use kvm_s390_clear_cpuflags()
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v1 2/4] KVM: s390: reuse kvm_s390_set_cpuflags()
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v1 1/4] KVM: s390: rename __set_cpuflag() to kvm_s390_set_cpuflags()
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v1 0/4] KVM: s390: refactor cpuflag handling
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: add proper locking for CMMA migration bitmap
- From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] s390/alternative: use a copy of the facility bit mask
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/3] s390/docs: mention subchannel types
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/3] s390: documentation update
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/3] s390/docs: reword airq section
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] s390/cmf: fix kerneldoc
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] s390/alternative: use a copy of the facility bit mask
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/5] s390: scrub registers on kernel entry and KVM exit
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 4/5] s390: define ISOLATE_BP to run tasks with modified branch prediction
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/5] s390/alternative: use a copy of the facility bit mask
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 11/43] tools include asm-generic: Grab errno.h and errno-base.h
- From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 13/43] perf trace: Obtain errno strings by using arch_syscalls__strerrno()
- From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 12/43] perf util: Introduce architecture specific errno/name mapping
- From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 10/43] tools include arch: Grab a copy of errno.h for arch's supported by perf
- From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 14/43] perf trace: Remove audit-libs dependency if syscall tables are present
- From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL 00/43] perf/core improvements and changes
- From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 5/5] s390: scrub registers on kernel entry and KVM exit
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC][PATCH 0/5] s390: improve speculative execution handling v2
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/5] s390/alternative: use a copy of the facility bit mask
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/5] s390: add options to change branch prediction behaviour for the kernel
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 5/5] s390: scrub registers on kernel entry and KVM exit
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/5] s390: define ISOLATE_BP to run tasks with modified branch prediction
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/5] prctl: add PR_ISOLATE_BP process control
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] KVM: s390: vsie: store guest addresses of satellite blocks in vsie_page
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] KVM: s390 vsie: use READ_ONCE to access some SCB fields
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] smc: return booleans instead of integers
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] KVM: s390: vsie: store guest addresses of satellite blocks in vsie_page
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] KVM: s390 vsie: use READ_ONCE to access some SCB fields
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] smc: return booleans instead of integers
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] smc: return booleans instead of integers
- From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [man-pages PATCH 1/5] s390_runtime_instr.2: note that runtime_instr.h is not a public header
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 03/22] s390/mm: add gmap PMD invalidation notification
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [strace PATCH v2] Introduce s390_sthyi system call decoder
- From: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 03/22] s390/mm: add gmap PMD invalidation notification
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [strace PATCH 04/12] Introduce s390_sthyi system call decoder
- From: Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 11/22] s390/mm: Remove superfluous parameter
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [man-pages PATCH 4/5] s390_sthyi.2: some minor additions
- From: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [strace PATCH 04/12] Introduce s390_sthyi system call decoder
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [man-pages PATCH 2/5] s390_runtime_instr.2: document the removal of the second argument
- From: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 03/22] s390/mm: add gmap PMD invalidation notification
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 11/22] s390/mm: Remove superfluous parameter
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [man-pages PATCH 1/5] s390_runtime_instr.2: note that runtime_instr.h is not a public header
- From: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 01/22] s390/mm: make gmap_protect_range more modular
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [strace PATCH v2] tests: check s390_sthyi system call decoder
- From: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 01/22] s390/mm: make gmap_protect_range more modular
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [strace PATCH 00/12] s390 architecture support improvements
- From: Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 01/22] s390/mm: make gmap_protect_range more modular
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 03/22] s390/mm: add gmap PMD invalidation notification
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 03/22] s390/mm: add gmap PMD invalidation notification
- From: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] smc: return booleans instead of integers
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 00/22] KVM/s390: Hugetlbfs enablement
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 03/22] s390/mm: add gmap PMD invalidation notification
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 03/22] s390/mm: add gmap PMD invalidation notification
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 02/22] s390/mm: Abstract gmap notify bit setting
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 01/22] s390/mm: make gmap_protect_range more modular
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 00/22] KVM/s390: Hugetlbfs enablement
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] perf trace: Remove audit-libs dependency if syscall tables are present
- From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [man-pages PATCH 5/5] man2: describe s390_guarded_storage s390-specific system call
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [man-pages PATCH 4/5] s390_sthyi.2: some minor additions
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [man-pages PATCH 2/5] s390_runtime_instr.2: document the removal of the second argument
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [man-pages PATCH 1/5] s390_runtime_instr.2: note that runtime_instr.h is not a public header
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [strace PATCH 00/12] s390 architecture support improvements
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] smc: return booleans instead of integers
- From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] smc: return boolean instead of integer in using_ipsec
- From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] perf trace: Remove audit-libs dependency if syscall tables are present
- From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] KVM: s390: define GISA format-0 data structure
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] KVM: s390: define GISA format-0 data structure
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] KVM: s390: define GISA format-0 data structure
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/12] KVM: s390: implement GISA IPM related primitives
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] KVM: s390: define GISA format-0 data structure
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/12] KVM: s390: implement GISA IPM related primitives
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] KVM: s390: define GISA format-0 data structure
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/12] KVM: s390: implement GISA IPM related primitives
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 5/5] perf trace: Remove audit-libs dependency if syscall tables are present
- From: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 2/5] tools include asm-generic: Grab errno.h and errno-base.h
- From: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 3/5] perf util: Introduce architecture specific errno/name mapping
- From: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 4/5] perf trace: Obtain errno values by using arch_syscalls__strerrno()
- From: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/5] tools include arch: Grab a copy of errno.h for arch's supported by perf
- From: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 0/5] perf trace: Introduce arch-specific errno code/name mappings
- From: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] smc: return boolean instead of integer in using_ipsec
- From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] s390: scrub registers on kernel entry and KVM exit
- From: QingFeng Hao <haoqf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] s390: scrub registers on kernel entry and KVM exit
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 6/6] s390: scrub registers on kernel entry and KVM exit
- From: QingFeng Hao <haoqf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/6] s390: add options to change branch prediction behaviour for the kernel
- From: QingFeng Hao <haoqf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [strace PATCH 01/12] Add compat support for s390x
- From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] smc: return boolean instead of integer in using_ipsec
- From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] KVM: s390: define GISA format-0 data structure
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/12] KVM: s390: implement GISA IPM related primitives
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 07/12] KVM: s390: abstract adapter interruption word generation from ISC
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 06/12] KVM: s390: exploit GISA and AIV for emulated interrupts
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 02/12] KVM: s390: define GISA format-0 data structure
- From: Michael Mueller <mimu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 05/12] s390/css: expose the AIV facility
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 00/99] XArray version 6
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 00/99] XArray version 6
- From: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 03/12] s390/bitops: add test_and_clear_bit_inv()
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/12] KVM: s390: reverse bit ordering of irqs in pending mask
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 00/99] XArray version 6
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 00/99] XArray version 6
- From: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/12] KVM: s390: implement GISA IPM related primitives
- From: Michael Mueller <mimu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/12] KVM: s390: implement GISA IPM related primitives
- From: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 04/12] KVM: s390: implement GISA IPM related primitives
- From: Michael Mueller <mimu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 85/99] btrfs: Remove unused spinlock
- From: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] perf util: Introduce architecture specific errno/name mapping
- From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] perf util: Introduce architecture specific errno/name mapping
- From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 05/12] s390/css: expose the AIV facility
- From: Michael Mueller <mimu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] perf util: Introduce architecture specific errno/name mapping
- From: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] perf util: Introduce architecture specific errno/name mapping
- From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: wire up bpb feature
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/5] perf util: Introduce architecture specific errno/name mapping
- From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: wire up bpb feature
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 3/6] s390: add options to change branch prediction behaviour for the kernel
- From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: wire up bpb feature
- From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [strace PATCH 12/12] Update NEWS
- From: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@xxxxxxxxx>
- [strace PATCH 11/12] tests: check s390_pci_mmio_read and s390_pci_mmio_write decoders
- From: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@xxxxxxxxx>
- [strace PATCH 10/12] Introduce s390_pci_mmio_read, s390_pci_mmio_write system call decoders
- From: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@xxxxxxxxx>
- [strace PATCH 09/12] tests: check s390_runtime_instr system call decoder
- From: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@xxxxxxxxx>
- [strace PATCH 08/12] Introduce s390_runtime_instr system call decoder
- From: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@xxxxxxxxx>
- [strace PATCH 07/12] tests: check s390_guarded_storage system call decoder
- From: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@xxxxxxxxx>
- [strace PATCH 06/12] Introduce s390_guarded_storage system call decoder
- From: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@xxxxxxxxx>
- [strace PATCH 05/12] tests: check s390_sthyi system call decoder
- From: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@xxxxxxxxx>
- [strace PATCH 04/12] Introduce s390_sthyi system call decoder
- From: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@xxxxxxxxx>
- [strace PATCH 03/12] print_fields.h: add macro to print hexadecimal array field
- From: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@xxxxxxxxx>
- [strace PATCH 02/12] Add print_quoted_string flag to generate comment
- From: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@xxxxxxxxx>
- [strace PATCH 01/12] Add compat support for s390x
- From: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@xxxxxxxxx>
- [strace PATCH 00/12] s390 architecture support improvements
- From: Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: wire up bpb feature
- From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 20/99] ida: Convert to XArray
- From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 04/99] xarray: Change definition of sibling entries
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 02/99] page cache: Use xa_lock
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 05/99] xarray: Add definition of struct xarray
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 03/99] xarray: Replace exceptional entries
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 07/99] xarray: Add documentation
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 06/99] xarray: Define struct xa_node
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 10/99] xarray: Add xa_store
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 08/99] xarray: Add xa_load
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 09/99] xarray: Add xa_get_tag, xa_set_tag and xa_clear_tag
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 12/99] xarray: Add xa_for_each
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 11/99] xarray: Add xa_cmpxchg and xa_insert
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 13/99] xarray: Add xa_extract
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 15/99] xarray: Add xas_next and xas_prev
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 14/99] xarray: Add xa_destroy
- From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Announce]
[IETF Annouce]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[Bugtraq]