Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 00/22] KVM/s390: Hugetlbfs enablement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/22/2018 12:23 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 13.12.2017 13:53, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> Since the z10 s390 does support 1M pages, but whereas hugetlbfs
>> support was added quite fast, KVM always used standard 4k pages for
>> guest backings.
>>
>> This patchset adds full support for 1M huge page backings for s390
>> KVM guests. I.e. we also support VSIE (nested vms) for these guests
>> and are therefore able to run all combinations of backings for all
>> layers of guests.
>>
>> When running a VSIE guest in a huge page backed guest, we need to
>> split some huge pages to be able to set granular protection. This way
>> we avoid a prot/unprot cycle if prefixes and VSIE pages containing
>> level 3 gmap DAT tables share the same segment, as the prefix has to
>> be accessible at all times and the VSIE page has to be write
>> protected.
>>
>> TODO:
>> * Cleanups & Documentation
>> * Refactoring to get rid of a lot of indents
>> * Find a way to reduce or beautify bit checks on table entries
>> * Storage key support for split pages (will be a separate bugfix)
>> * Regression testing
>> * Testing large setups
>> * Testing multi level VSIE
>>
>> V2:
>> 	* Incorporated changes from David's cleanup
>> 	* Now flushing with IDTE_NODAT for protection transfers.
>> 	* Added RRBE huge page handling for g2 -> g3 skey emulation
>> 	* Added documentation for capability
>> 	* Renamed GMAP_ENTRY_* constants
>> 	* Added SEGMENT hardware bits constants
>> 	* Improved some patch descriptions
>> 	* General small improvements
>> 	* Introduced pte_from_pmd function
>>
>> Accomplished testing:
>> l2: KVM guest
>> l3: nested KVM guest
>>
>> * 1m l2 guests
>> * VSIE (l3) 4k and 1m guests on 1m l2
>> * 1m l2 -> l2 migration with 4k/1m l3 guests
>> * l3 -> l2 migration
>> * postcopy works every second try, seems to be QEMU or my setup
>>
>>
>> The initial prototype was started by Dominik Dingel. I had the
>> pleasure of adding the VSIE part, the protection transfers and the
>> optimizations. A huge thanks to Christian and Martin who review(ed)
>> and helped debugging/designing.
>>
> 
> Do you have a branch somewhere? I can't find a branch where this applies
> cleanly. Thanks

Pushed to 

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/linux.git hlp_vsie

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/linux.git/log/?h=hlp_vsie

Thanks for looking into that.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux