On 01/26/2018 10:06 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Geert,
I wasn't sure what would be the best ordering since we would never hit the
issue if patch 1 didn't exist. But if the preference is to invert the
ordering of patches, then I will change the ordering.
Alternatively, you can combine two patches into a single patch, which
moves the dependency from the whole subsystem to the driver that needs
it (are there more?).
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
I like the idea of combining both patches into one.
There are other fbdev drivers that use iomem (found by grepping for
"devm_ioremap_resource"):
CONFIG_FB_S3C (s3c-fb.c)
CONFIG_FB_CLPS711X (clps711x-fb.c)
CONFIG_FB_JZ4740 (jz4740_fb.c)
CONFIG_FB_DA8XX (da8xx-fb.c)
CONFIG_FB_WM8505 (wm8505fb.c)
CONFIG_OMAP2_VRFB (omap2/omapfb/vrfb.c)
CONFIG_FB_OMAP2 (omap2/omapfb/dss/*
CONFIG_FB_MXS (mxsfb.c)
CONFIG_PXA3XX_GCU (pxa3xx-gcu.c)
CONFIG_FB_XILINX (xilinxfb.c)
All of these are already fenced off by architecture dependencies (which
I am assuming enables CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM by default). If we want to be
cautious I can add HAS_IOMEM dependency for all of them.
Thanks
Farhan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
