Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] net/smc: return booleans instead of integers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2018-01-26 at 09:28 +0100, Ursula Braun wrote:
> From: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Return statements in functions returning bool should use
> true/false instead of 1/0.
> 
> This issue was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  net/smc/smc.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/smc/smc.h b/net/smc/smc.h
> index bfbe20234105..9518986c97b1 100644
> --- a/net/smc/smc.h
> +++ b/net/smc/smc.h
> @@ -252,12 +252,12 @@ static inline int smc_uncompress_bufsize(u8 compressed)
>  static inline bool using_ipsec(struct smc_sock *smc)
>  {
>  	return (smc->clcsock->sk->sk_policy[0] ||
> -		smc->clcsock->sk->sk_policy[1]) ? 1 : 0;
> +		smc->clcsock->sk->sk_policy[1]) ? true : false;
>  }

Hello Ursula,

If you ever have to touch this code again, please follow the style of other kernel
code and leave out the "? true : false" part and also the parentheses. Both are
superfluous.

Thanks,

Bart.


��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��������ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux