On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 01:11:19PM +0000, Eugene Syromyatnikov wrote: > On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 11:28 AM, Heiko Carstens > <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > IMHO we shouldn't document the file name of a kernel header that is not > > exported. It's name and location can change anytime. I will move the kernel > > header file to the uapi directory where it should have been since a long > > time. > > In that case, I think it could be rephrased to something like "the > header asm/runtime_instr.h is available for the userspace programs > since Linux 4.15, before that it was located in > arch/s390/include/asm/runtime_instr.h in the kernel's source tree", as > man-pages project (as I understood) tends to reference places in > kernel's source tree if it is deemed useful; it is usually applied to > documentation files, however, although they also have tendency to > migrate over time. Yes, that's ok. However moving the header file to uapi is not going to happen before kernel version 4.16. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
