On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 11:28 AM, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > IMHO we shouldn't document the file name of a kernel header that is not > exported. It's name and location can change anytime. I will move the kernel > header file to the uapi directory where it should have been since a long > time. In that case, I think it could be rephrased to something like "the header asm/runtime_instr.h is available for the userspace programs since Linux 4.15, before that it was located in arch/s390/include/asm/runtime_instr.h in the kernel's source tree", as man-pages project (as I understood) tends to reference places in kernel's source tree if it is deemed useful; it is usually applied to documentation files, however, although they also have tendency to migrate over time. -- Eugene Syromyatnikov mailto:evgsyr@xxxxxxxxx xmpp:esyr@jabber.{ru|org} -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
