Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: s390: use switch vs jump table in intercept.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 02/06/2018 01:04 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue,  6 Feb 2018 11:21:27 +0000
> Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> instead of having huge jump tables for function selection,
> 
> s/instead/Instead/
> 
>> lets use normal switch/case statements for the instruction
> 
> s/lets/let's/
> 
>> handlers in intercept.c We can now also get rid of
>> intercept_handler_t.
>>
>> bloat-o-meter output:
>> add/remove: 0/1 grow/shrink: 1/0 up/down: 280/-2048 (-1768)
>> Function                                     old     new   delta
>> kvm_handle_sie_intercept                    1530    1810    +280
>> instruction_handlers                        2048       -   -2048
>> Total: Before=5227, After=3459, chg -33.82%
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>>  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h  |  2 --
>>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>>
> 
>> @@ -129,16 +113,34 @@ static int handle_validity(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>  
>>  static int handle_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>  {
>> -	intercept_handler_t handler;
>> -
>> -	vcpu->stat.exit_instruction++;
>> -	trace_kvm_s390_intercept_instruction(vcpu,
>> -					     vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa,
>> -					     vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb);
> 
> Is dropping the tracing intentional?

nope, its a bug :-)

> 
>> -	handler = instruction_handlers[vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa >> 8];
>> -	if (handler)
>> -		return handler(vcpu);
>> -	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +	switch (vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa >> 8) {
>> +	case 0x01:
>> +		return kvm_s390_handle_01(vcpu);
>> +	case 0x82:
>> +		return kvm_s390_handle_lpsw(vcpu);
>> +	case 0x83:
>> +		return kvm_s390_handle_diag(vcpu);
>> +	case 0xaa:
>> +		return kvm_s390_handle_aa(vcpu);
>> +	case 0xae:
>> +		return kvm_s390_handle_sigp(vcpu);
>> +	case 0xb2:
>> +		return kvm_s390_handle_b2(vcpu);
>> +	case 0xb6:
>> +		return kvm_s390_handle_stctl(vcpu);
>> +	case 0xb7:
>> +		return kvm_s390_handle_lctl(vcpu);
>> +	case 0xb9:
>> +		return kvm_s390_handle_b9(vcpu);
>> +	case 0xe3:
>> +		return kvm_s390_handle_e3(vcpu);
>> +	case 0xe5:
>> +		return kvm_s390_handle_e5(vcpu);
>> +	case 0xeb:
>> +		return kvm_s390_handle_eb(vcpu);
>> +	default:
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +	}
>>  }
>>  
> 
> Else, looks good.
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux