On 01/23/2018 01:31 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 12:58 +0100, Ursula Braun wrote:
>>
>> On 01/19/2018 09:54 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>>> Return statements in functions returning bool should use
>>> true/false instead of 1/0.
>>>
>>> This issue was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - Fix function using_ipsec as suggested by Ursula Braun.
>>> - Update subject line.
>>>
>>> net/smc/smc.h | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/smc/smc.h b/net/smc/smc.h
> []
>>> @@ -253,12 +253,12 @@ static inline int smc_uncompress_bufsize(u8 compressed)
>>> static inline bool using_ipsec(struct smc_sock *smc)
>>> {
>>> return (smc->clcsock->sk->sk_policy[0] ||
>>> - smc->clcsock->sk->sk_policy[1]) ? 1 : 0;
>>> + smc->clcsock->sk->sk_policy[1]) ? true : false;
>
> Generally, any bool return like
>
> return condition ? true : false;
>
> could be written
>
> return condition;
>
This would be shorter, but is it really better readable/understandable?
Do you have a reference for us confirming your proposed style is the way to go?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
