Instead of having huge jump tables for function selection, let's use normal switch/case statements for the instruction handlers in intercept.c We can now also get rid of intercept_handler_t. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h | 2 -- 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c b/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c index 9c7d70715862..07c6e81163bf 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c @@ -22,22 +22,6 @@ #include "trace.h" #include "trace-s390.h" - -static const intercept_handler_t instruction_handlers[256] = { - [0x01] = kvm_s390_handle_01, - [0x82] = kvm_s390_handle_lpsw, - [0x83] = kvm_s390_handle_diag, - [0xaa] = kvm_s390_handle_aa, - [0xae] = kvm_s390_handle_sigp, - [0xb2] = kvm_s390_handle_b2, - [0xb6] = kvm_s390_handle_stctl, - [0xb7] = kvm_s390_handle_lctl, - [0xb9] = kvm_s390_handle_b9, - [0xe3] = kvm_s390_handle_e3, - [0xe5] = kvm_s390_handle_e5, - [0xeb] = kvm_s390_handle_eb, -}; - u8 kvm_s390_get_ilen(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { struct kvm_s390_sie_block *sie_block = vcpu->arch.sie_block; @@ -129,16 +113,39 @@ static int handle_validity(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) static int handle_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { - intercept_handler_t handler; - vcpu->stat.exit_instruction++; trace_kvm_s390_intercept_instruction(vcpu, vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa, vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb); - handler = instruction_handlers[vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa >> 8]; - if (handler) - return handler(vcpu); - return -EOPNOTSUPP; + + switch (vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa >> 8) { + case 0x01: + return kvm_s390_handle_01(vcpu); + case 0x82: + return kvm_s390_handle_lpsw(vcpu); + case 0x83: + return kvm_s390_handle_diag(vcpu); + case 0xaa: + return kvm_s390_handle_aa(vcpu); + case 0xae: + return kvm_s390_handle_sigp(vcpu); + case 0xb2: + return kvm_s390_handle_b2(vcpu); + case 0xb6: + return kvm_s390_handle_stctl(vcpu); + case 0xb7: + return kvm_s390_handle_lctl(vcpu); + case 0xb9: + return kvm_s390_handle_b9(vcpu); + case 0xe3: + return kvm_s390_handle_e3(vcpu); + case 0xe5: + return kvm_s390_handle_e5(vcpu); + case 0xeb: + return kvm_s390_handle_eb(vcpu); + default: + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } } static int inject_prog_on_prog_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h index bd31b37b0e6f..3c0a975c2477 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h @@ -19,8 +19,6 @@ #include <asm/processor.h> #include <asm/sclp.h> -typedef int (*intercept_handler_t)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu); - /* Transactional Memory Execution related macros */ #define IS_TE_ENABLED(vcpu) ((vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb & ECB_TE)) #define TDB_FORMAT1 1 -- 2.14.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html