On 02/06/2018 01:30 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 06.02.2018 12:21, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> Some old patches refreshed. >> > > Certainly the right thing to do. Especially also interesting due to > retpotline (if we get something like that on s390x). If I remember > correctly, x86 highly benefits by replacing magic function pointer by > switch statements. > > Should we go ahead and also rework interrupt delivery? Yes, that was my plan but I have not started. Do you want to work on that? > >> Christian Borntraeger (2): >> KVM: s390: use switch vs jump table in priv.c >> KVM: s390: use switch vs jump table in intercept.c >> >> arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c | 54 +++++++------- >> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h | 2 - >> arch/s390/kvm/priv.c | 183 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- >> 3 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 120 deletions(-) >> > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
