On Mon, 2018-02-12 at 09:26 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 10:13:44AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > That actually sounds like we could just > > > > (a) make gcc 4.5 be the minimum required version > > > > (b) actually error out if we find a bad compiler > > So the unofficial plan was to enforce asm-goto and -fentry support by > hard failure to build, which would get us at gcc-4.6 and then remove all > the fallback cruft needed for those features -- for x86. If we want to > do this tree wide, that's obviously OK with me too ;-) This would also kill clang support, right?
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
