Linux Next
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: [PATCH] block/partitions/efi.c: ensure that the GPT header is at least the size of the structure.
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the xen-two tree
- From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -next] security/integrity/ima: make part_pack_uuid() always visible
- From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -next] security/integrity/ima: make part_pack_uuid() always visible
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: dw_mmc build broken in next-20130220 (was Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] lib/scatterlist: use page iterator in the mapping iterator)
- From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 19 (security/integrity/ima)
- From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCHv2] idr: always do slow path when hint is uninitialized
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] events: always do slow path when trying to find a pmu
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCHv2] idr: always do slow path when hint is uninitialized
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] events: always do slow path when trying to find a pmu
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] events: always do slow path when trying to find a pmu
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- dw_mmc build broken in next-20130220 (was Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] lib/scatterlist: use page iterator in the mapping iterator)
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- since-3.8 branch opened for mm git tree (was: mmotm 2013-02-19-17-20 uploaded)
- From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/11] ARM: disable virt_to_bus/virt_to_bus almost everywhere
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/11] ARM: disable virt_to_bus/virt_to_bus almost everywhere
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 01/11] ARM: disable virt_to_bus/virt_to_bus almost everywhere
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] block/partitions/efi.c: ensure that the GPT header is at least the size of the structure.
- From: Peter Jones <pjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Peter Jones <pjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 20
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net-next tree
- From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the modem_shm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the vhost tree with the virtio tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the virtio tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the virtio tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2013-02-19-17-20 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mips tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 19 (security/integrity/ima)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Broken build due to 6aed8ec "drm: review locking for drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode"
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Broken build due to 6aed8ec "drm: review locking for drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode"
- From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
- Broken build due to 6aed8ec "drm: review locking for drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode"
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux 3.8
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-intel tree
- From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 19
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the wireless-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux 3.8
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-intel tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: interesting commits in the cifs tree
- From: Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: interesting commits in the cifs tree
- From: Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: interesting commits in the cifs tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH linux-next]cputime: fix compiler warning caused by timeval_to_cputime()
- From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the kbuild tree
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 18
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the kbuild tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the userns tree with the nfsd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the input tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the driver-core tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the driver-core tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the kbuild tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mips tree
- From: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the mips tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the xen-two tree
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] xen/acpi: xen cpu hotplug minor updates
- From: "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] xen/acpi: xen memory hotplug minor updates
- From: "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: manual merge of the acpi tree with the pm tree
- From: "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the xen-two tree
- From: "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH linux-next] Remove unused variable in mwait_play_dead()
- From: Li Zhong <zhong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH linux-next]cputime: fix compiler warning caused by timeval_to_cputime()
- From: Li Zhong <zhong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the xen-two tree
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix misbehavior caused by wrong bit masks
- From: Bryan Wu <cooloney@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the char-misc tree
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -next] i2c: fix i2c-ismt.c printk format warning
- From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -next] i2c: fix i2c-ismt.c printk format warning
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the char-misc tree
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the xen-two tree
- From: "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the char-misc tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the xen-two tree
- From: "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the xen-two tree
- From: "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] xen/acpi: updates the argument of .remove operation of xen cpu/mem hotplug
- From: "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the tree
- From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-intel tree
- From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the xen-two tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the xen-two tree
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the xen-two tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the xen-two tree
- From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 15
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-intel tree
- From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 15
- From: "Arend van Spriel" <arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 15
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the workqueues tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the idle tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the char-misc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the xen-two tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-intel tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 13 (virtio_console)
- From: Joe Millenbach <jmillenbach@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 13 (virtio_console)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 13 (virtio_console)
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 13 (virtio_console)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 13 (virtio_console)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 13 (virtio_console)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 13 (virtio_console)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 13 (virtio_console)
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 14
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -next 1/1] net: skbuff: fix compile error in skb_panic()
- From: Jean Sacren <sakiwit@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 13 (virtio_console)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -next 1/1] net: skbuff: fix compile error in skb_panic()
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix misbehavior caused by wrong bit masks
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix misbehavior caused by wrong bit masks
- From: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: devm_gpio_* support should not depend on GPIOLIB
- From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ia64 tree with Linus' tree
- From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -next 1/1] net: skbuff: fix compile error in skb_panic()
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -next 1/1] net: skbuff: fix compile error in skb_panic()
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 13
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the ipsec-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the metag tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the ia64 tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the acpi tree with the pm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 12 (drm_pci.c)
- From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 12 [ WARNING: at drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:427 flush_to_ldisc | tty is NULL ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should SPARC use cpuidle? (was: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (acpi tree related))
- From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should SPARC use cpuidle?
- From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Should SPARC use cpuidle?
- From: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Should SPARC use cpuidle? (was: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (acpi tree related))
- From: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (acpi tree related)
- From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 12 (drm_pci.c)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the mfd tree
- From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the mfd tree
- From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the metag tree
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: devm_gpio_* support should not depend on GPIOLIB
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 12
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the usb tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the metag tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Bisected] [-next-20130204] usb/hcd: irq 18: nobody cared
- From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Bisected] [-next-20130204] usb/hcd: irq 18: nobody cared
- From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the acpi tree with the pm tree
- From: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (acpi tree related)
- From: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Bisected] [-next-20130204] usb/hcd: irq 18: nobody cared
- From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] of: fix recursive locking in of_get_next_available_child()
- From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH next v2] OF: convert devtree lock from rw_lock to raw spinlock
- From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH next v2] OF: convert devtree lock from rw_lock to raw spinlock
- From: Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH next v2] OF: convert devtree lock from rw_lock to raw spinlock
- From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] of: fix recursive locking in of_get_next_available_child()
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Bisected] [-next-20130204] usb/hcd: irq 18: nobody cared
- From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: devm_gpio_* support should not depend on GPIOLIB
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Bisected] [-next-20130204] usb/hcd: irq 18: nobody cared
- From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH next v2] OF: convert devtree lock from rw_lock to raw spinlock
- From: Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Bisected] [-next-20130204] usb/hcd: irq 18: nobody cared
- From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Bisected] [-next-20130204] usb/hcd: irq 18: nobody cared
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH next v2] OF: convert devtree lock from rw_lock to raw spinlock
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Bisected] [-next-20130204] usb/hcd: irq 18: nobody cared
- From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the mfd tree
- From: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the mfd tree
- From: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (acpi tree related)
- From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 11 (intel_pstate.c)
- From: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: devm_gpio_* support should not depend on GPIOLIB
- From: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 11 (intel_pstate.c)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the tty tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: devm_gpio_* support should not depend on GPIOLIB
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Bisected] [-next-20130204] usb/hcd: irq 18: nobody cared
- From: Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Amir Vadai <amirv@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the pm tree
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [Bisected] [-next-20130204] usb/hcd: irq 18: nobody cared
- From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] wlcore: remove newly introduced alloc/OOM messages
- From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] wlcore: remove newly introduced alloc/OOM messages
- From: Luciano Coelho <coelho@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] wlcore: remove newly introduced alloc/OOM messages
- From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] wlcore: remove newly introduced alloc/OOM messages
- From: Luciano Coelho <coelho@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] wlcore: remove newly introduced alloc/OOM messages
- From: Luciano Coelho <coelho@xxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] wlcore: remove newly introduced alloc/OOM messages
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] wlcore: remove newly introduced alloc/OOM messages
- From: Luciano Coelho <coelho@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the net-next tree
- From: Luciano Coelho <coelho@xxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 11
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (acpi tree related)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the net-next tree
- From: Luciano Coelho <coelho@xxxxxx>
- Re: [Bisected] [-next-20130204] usb/hcd: irq 18: nobody cared
- From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the usb tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the mfd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the usb tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the tty tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the pm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree with the sound-asoc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the net-next tree
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the acpi tree with the pm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the acpi tree with the pm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Bisected] [-next-20130204] usb/hcd: irq 18: nobody cared
- From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [Bisected] [-next-20130204] usb/hcd: irq 18: nobody cared
- From: Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: devm_gpio_* support should not depend on GPIOLIB
- From: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@xxxxxxxxx>
- [Bisected] [-next-20130204] usb/hcd: irq 18: nobody cared
- From: Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfsd tree
- From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-pm] linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-pm] linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-pm] linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-pm] linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-pm] linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-pm] linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [linux-pm] linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [-next-20130204] usb/hcd: irq 18: nobody cared
- From: Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]
- From: Hillf Danton <dhillf@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the mfd tree
- From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next build conflict between modules and metag trees (LOCKDEP_NOW_UNRELIABLE)
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ smp|cpufreq: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:245 smp_call_function_single ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 8 [ idr fixes from akpm-tree ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next build conflict between modules and metag trees (LOCKDEP_NOW_UNRELIABLE)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfsd tree
- From: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next build conflict between modules and metag trees (LOCKDEP_NOW_UNRELIABLE)
- From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 8
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next build conflict between modules and metag trees (LOCKDEP_NOW_UNRELIABLE)
- From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the watchdog tree with the mfd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] staging/goldfish: Add MTD dependency to KCONFIG
- From: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@xxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 6 [WARNING: at kernel/sched/clock.c:219 sched_clock_cpu+0xf9/0x110()]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] ipc: convert to idr_alloc()
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 7 (staging/goldfish)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 7 (drivers/misc/mei)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] ipc: convert to idr_alloc()
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 7 (fakeroot BROKEN due to SYSV IPC support?)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 7 (fakeroot BROKEN due to SYSV IPC support?)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next build conflict between modules and metag trees (LOCKDEP_NOW_UNRELIABLE)
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 7 (fakeroot BROKEN due to SYSV IPC support?)
- From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 7 (fakeroot BROKEN due to SYSV IPC support?)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Heads up on a device tree change
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 7 (fakeroot BROKEN due to SYSV IPC support?)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 7 (fakeroot BROKEN due to SYSV IPC support?)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2013-02-06-17-13 uploaded (alsa)
- From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the s390 tree
- From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the kvm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 7
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the kvm tree
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the kvm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2013-02-06-17-13 uploaded (alsa)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2013-02-06-17-13 uploaded (iio)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the s390 tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the iommu tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the iommu tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the s390 tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2013-02-06-17-13 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20130204 - bisected slab problem to "slab: Common constants for kmalloc boundaries"
- From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Heads up on a device tree change
- From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Heads up on a device tree change
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Heads up on a device tree change
- From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the metag tree with the arc tree
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20130204 - bisected slab problem to "slab: Common constants for kmalloc boundaries"
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: EXPORT_SYMBOL(min_low_pfn);
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 6 [WARNING: at kernel/sched/clock.c:219 sched_clock_cpu+0xf9/0x110()]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 6
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the nfsd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the spi tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the iommu tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree with the net-next tree
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the iommu tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the spi tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the spi tree with the sound-asoc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the battery tree with the mfd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the crypto tree with the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2013-02-05-17-21 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: EXPORT_SYMBOL(min_low_pfn);
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the metag tree with the arc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] init: fix name of root device in /proc/mounts
- From: William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] init: fix name of root device in /proc/mounts
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [-next-20130204] usb/hcd: irq 18: nobody cared
- From: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] init: fix name of root device in /proc/mounts
- From: William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] init: fix name of root device in /proc/mounts
- From: William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@xxxxxxxxx>
- [-next-20130204] usb/hcd: irq 18: nobody cared
- From: Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- EXPORT_SYMBOL(min_low_pfn);
- From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20130204 - bisected slab problem to "slab: Common constants for kmalloc boundaries"
- From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20130204 - bisected slab problem to "slab: Common constants for kmalloc boundaries"
- From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the xen-two tree
- From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20130204 - bisected slab problem to "slab: Common constants for kmalloc boundaries"
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20130204 - bisected slab problem to "slab: Common constants for kmalloc boundaries"
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20130204 - bisected slab problem to "slab: Common constants for kmalloc boundaries"
- From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20130204 - bisected slab problem to "slab: Common constants for kmalloc boundaries"
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Revert "console: implement lockdep support for console_lock"
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Revert "console: implement lockdep support for console_lock"
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20130204 - bisected slab problem to "slab: Common constants for kmalloc boundaries"
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 5
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 5
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] netfilter: fix missing dependencies for NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_CONNLABEL
- From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20130204 - bisected slab problem to "slab: Common constants for kmalloc boundaries"
- From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: CPU hotplug hang due to "swap: make each swap partition have one address_space"
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20130204 - bisected slab problem to "slab: Common constants for kmalloc boundaries"
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20130204 - bisected slab problem to "slab: Common constants for kmalloc boundaries"
- From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix error caused by shifted mask
- From: Bryan Wu <cooloney@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the mfd tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the clk tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Mike Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: CPU hotplug hang due to "swap: make each swap partition have one address_space"
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- next-20130204 - bisected slab problem to "slab: Common constants for kmalloc boundaries"
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix error caused by shifted mask
- From: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] regmap: include linux/sched.h to fix build
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the mips tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the mfd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the pinctrl tree with the battery tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the mfd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the net-next tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: CPU hotplug hang due to "swap: make each swap partition have one address_space"
- From: Joseph Lo <josephl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the xen-two tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: CPU hotplug hang due to "swap: make each swap partition have one address_space"
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] netfilter: fix missing dependencies for NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_CONNLABEL
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfsd tree
- From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] netfilter: fix missing dependencies for NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_CONNLABEL
- From: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] regmap: include linux/sched.h to fix build
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 2 (netfilter)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Feb 2
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cortex tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the watchdog tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfsd tree
- From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the clk tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cortex tree with the arm tree
- From: Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the cortex tree with the arm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the l2-mtd tree
- From: Stefan Roese <sr@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- CPU hotplug hang due to "swap: make each swap partition have one address_space"
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warnings after merge of the l2-mtd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfsd tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix error caused by shifted mask
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix error caused by shifted mask
- From: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Linux-Next releases this week?
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Revert "console: implement lockdep support for console_lock"
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Revert "console: implement lockdep support for console_lock"
- From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Revert "console: implement lockdep support for console_lock"
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Linux-Next releases this week?
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: next-20130128 lockdep whinge in sys_swapon()
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: BUG: circular locking dependency detected
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: BUG: circular locking dependency detected
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] watchdog: da9055_wdt needs to select WATCHDOG_CORE
- From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH -next] staging: comedi: ISA DMA drivers should depend on ISA_DMA_API
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH -next] staging: comedi: ISA DMA drivers should depend on ISA_DMA_API
- From: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: no tree for Jan 30
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the pinctrl tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH -next] staging: comedi: ISA DMA drivers should depend on ISA_DMA_API
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the battery tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
- From: "Lan, Tianyu" <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the driver-core tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
- From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
- From: Joe Millenbach <jmillenbach@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
- From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
- From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
- From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
- From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
- From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
- From: Joe Millenbach <jmillenbach@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
- From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] watchdog: da9055_wdt needs to select WATCHDOG_CORE
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
- From: "Lan, Tianyu" <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
- From: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
- From: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the tty tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 28
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the sound-asoc tree
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the sound-asoc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the driver-core tree
- From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the driver-core tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the driver-core tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the tty tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Boot crashes due to global async pending list
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [next-20130124][next-20130125] Fix available for broken PM-suspend
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (kvm)
- From: Avi Kivity <avi.kivity@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23 (mtd/ubi and iio and crypto/crc32[c])
- From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (kvm)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with Linus' tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with Linus' tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Crash with 9fdb04c "async: replace list of active domains with global list of pending items"
- From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] extcon: max77693: Fix bug of build error related to INPUT subsystem
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (kvm)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH next-20130124] Sound: pci: Fix unused variable warning in patch_sigmatel.c
- From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH next-20130124] Sound: pci: Fix unused variable warning in patch_sigmatel.c
- From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH next-20130124] Sound: pci: Fix unused variable warning in patch_sigmatel.c
- From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 25
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Crash with 9fdb04c "async: replace list of active domains with global list of pending items"
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] extcon: max77693: Fix bug of build error related to INPUT subsystem
- From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 24 (extcon-max77693)
- From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] serial: pch_uart: fix sysrq handling for pch_uart
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 24 (extcon-max77693)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (akpm tree related)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH next-20130124] Sound: pci: Fix unused variable warning in patch_sigmatel.c
- From: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (akpm tree related)
- From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 24
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (akpm tree related)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] serial: pch_uart: fix sysrq handling for pch_uart
- From: Liang Li <liang.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23 (pch_uart.c)
- From: Liang Li <liang.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23 (pch_uart.c)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23 (pch_uart.c)
- From: Liang Li <liang.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23 (pch_uart.c)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2013-01-23-17-04 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the mips tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23 (hvc and virtio_console)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23 (mtd/ubi and iio and crypto/crc32[c])
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23 (pch_uart.c)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23 (mtd/ubi and iio and crypto/crc32[c])
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23 (mtd/ubi and iio and crypto/crc32[c])
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with Linus' tree
- From: "Grumbach, Emmanuel" <emmanuel.grumbach@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the pm tree
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pinctrl tree with the driver-core tree
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- AW: [PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix error caused by shifted mask
- From: "GMEINER.Christian" <C.GMEINER@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix error caused by shifted mask
- From: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/3] leds-ot200: Fix error caused by shifted mask
- From: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Tang Chen <tangchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 23
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build warning after merge of the akpm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the leds tree
- From: "Kim, Milo" <Milo.Kim@xxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the pm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pinctrl tree with the driver-core tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the pinctrl tree with the driver-core tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with Linus' tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the leds tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the pm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the mips tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the mips tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the net tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (gpio-lw tree related)
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (gpio-lw tree related)
- From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (gpio-lw tree related)
- From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 22
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (gpio-lw tree related)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with Linus' tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with Linus' tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 21 (ntb_hw.c)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 21 (8250.c)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 21 (gpio-palmas.c)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 (x509)
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the drm tree
- From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
- From: "Lan, Tianyu" <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/1] page_alloc: Bootmem limit with movablecore_map
- From: Tang Chen <tangchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (akpm tree related)
- From: Tang Chen <tangchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 21
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (akpm tree related)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio-lw tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio-lw tree
- From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the drm tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the gpio-lw tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with Linus' tree
- From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: WARNING: at drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:476 flush_to_ldisc()
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20130118] Analyzing a call-trace reproducible with pm_test/freezer [ X86|RCU|TTY|EXT4FS|JBD2|PM related? ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20130118] Analyzing a call-trace reproducible with pm_test/freezer [ X86|RCU|TTY|EXT4FS|JBD2|PM related? ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: WARNING: at drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:476 flush_to_ldisc()
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20130118] Analyzing a call-trace reproducible with pm_test/freezer [ X86|RCU|TTY|EXT4FS|JBD2|PM related? ]
- From: Ilya Zykov <ilya@xxxxxxx>
- Re: WARNING: at drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:476 flush_to_ldisc()
- From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20130118] Analyzing a call-trace reproducible with pm_test/freezer [ X86|RCU|TTY|EXT4FS|JBD2|PM related? ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20130118] Analyzing a call-trace reproducible with pm_test/freezer [ X86|RCU|TTY|EXT4FS|JBD2|PM related? ]
- From: Ilya Zykov <ilya@xxxxxxx>
- Re: WARNING: at drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:476 flush_to_ldisc()
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20130118] Analyzing a call-trace reproducible with pm_test/freezer [ X86|RCU|TTY|EXT4FS|JBD2|PM related? ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20130118] Analyzing a call-trace reproducible with pm_test/freezer [ X86|RCU|TTY|EXT4FS|JBD2|PM related? ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20130118] Analyzing a call-trace reproducible with pm_test/freezer [ X86|RCU|TTY|EXT4FS|JBD2|PM related? ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 (acpi)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 (acpi)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 (acpi)
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 (acpi)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] tty: Correct tty buffer flush.
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 (acpi)
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN tty-next on suspend ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2013-01-18-15-48 uploaded
- From: Zlatko Calusic <zlatko.calusic@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 (acpi)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH next-20130118 1/2] KEYS: Fix build-error when SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING=n
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH next-20130118 1/2] KEYS: Fix build-error when SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING=n
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH next-20130118 2/2] KEYS: MODSIGN: Fix wrong select in MODULE_SIG Kconfig
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH next-20130118 1/2] KEYS: Fix build-error when SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING=n
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 (x509)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- mmotm 2013-01-18-15-48 uploaded
- From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio-lw tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [MODSIGN: KEYS:]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [MODSIGN: KEYS:]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 (powerclamp)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [MODSIGN: KEYS:]
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: devm_gpio_* support should not depend on GPIOLIB
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [MODSIGN: KEYS:]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [MODSIGN: KEYS:]
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: "Kondratiev, Vladimir" <vkondrat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio-lw tree
- From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] gpio: devm_gpio_* support should not depend on GPIOLIB
- From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 18
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the slave-dma tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio-lw tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the tty.current tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with Linus' tree
- From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
- From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the tty tree
- From: Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez <siglesias@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: error when fething the git.secretlab.ca trees
- From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
- From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 17
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the tty tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
- From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the tty.current tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with Linus' tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: error when fething the git.secretlab.ca trees
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: error when fething the git.secretlab.ca trees
- From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: error when fething the git.secretlab.ca trees
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [3.8-{rc1,rc2}] ata1.00: failed to get Identify Device Data, Emask 0x1
- From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.8-rc2 lockdep complains about console_lock vs. fb_notifier_list.rwsem
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [3.8-{rc1,rc2}] ata1.00: failed to get Identify Device Data, Emask 0x1
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.8-rc2 lockdep complains about console_lock vs. fb_notifier_list.rwsem
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: 3.8-rc2 lockdep complains about console_lock vs. fb_notifier_list.rwsem
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20130114] Call-trace in LTP (lite) madvise02 test (block|mm|vfs related?)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Tony Prisk <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 16
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Tony Prisk <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the slave-dma tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the slave-dma tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Why no Tree for Jan 15?
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Tree for Jan 15
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the block tree
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20130114] Call-trace in LTP (lite) madvise02 test (block|mm|vfs related?)
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mmotm 2013-01-11-15-47 (trouble starting kvm)
- From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the block tree
- From: Asai Thambi S P <asamymuthupa@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Why no Tree for Jan 15?
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: linux-next: Why no Tree for Jan 15?
- From: Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- linux-next: Why no Tree for Jan 15?
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 14 (mtd)
- From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20130114] Call-trace in LTP (lite) madvise02 test (block|mm|vfs related?)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20130114] Call-trace in LTP (lite) madvise02 test (block|mm|vfs related?)
- From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
- From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mm: fix BUG on madvise early failure
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mm: fix BUG on madvise early failure
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] mm: fix BUG on madvise early failure
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20130114] Call-trace in LTP (lite) madvise02 test (block|mm|vfs related?)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
- From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [next-20130114] Call-trace in LTP (lite) madvise02 test (block|mm|vfs related?)
- From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 14 (mtd)
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 14 (mtd)
- From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@xxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux SCSI]
[Samba]
[Yosemite News]
