Linux Next

• Thread Index

• Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
  • From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] regmap: include linux/sched.h to fix build
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the mips tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the pinctrl tree with the battery tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the net-next tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: CPU hotplug hang due to "swap: make each swap partition have one address_space"
  • From: Joseph Lo <josephl@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the net-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the net-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the xen-two tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: CPU hotplug hang due to "swap: make each swap partition have one address_space"
  • From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] netfilter: fix missing dependencies for NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_CONNLABEL
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfsd tree
  • From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] netfilter: fix missing dependencies for NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_CONNLABEL
  • From: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] regmap: include linux/sched.h to fix build
  • From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 2 (netfilter)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Feb 2
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cortex tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the watchdog tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfsd tree
  • From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the clk tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cortex tree with the arm tree
  • From: Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the cortex tree with the arm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the l2-mtd tree
  • From: Stefan Roese <sr@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
  • From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• CPU hotplug hang due to "swap: make each swap partition have one address_space"
  • From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warnings after merge of the l2-mtd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfsd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix error caused by shifted mask
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix error caused by shifted mask
  • From: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Linux-Next releases this week?
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Revert "console: implement lockdep support for console_lock"
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Revert "console: implement lockdep support for console_lock"
  • From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Revert "console: implement lockdep support for console_lock"
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Linux-Next releases this week?
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20130128 lockdep whinge in sys_swapon()
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: BUG: circular locking dependency detected
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: BUG: circular locking dependency detected
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] watchdog: da9055_wdt needs to select WATCHDOG_CORE
  • From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] staging: comedi: ISA DMA drivers should depend on ISA_DMA_API
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: [PATCH -next] staging: comedi: ISA DMA drivers should depend on ISA_DMA_API
  • From: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: no tree for Jan 30
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the pinctrl tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] staging: comedi: ISA DMA drivers should depend on ISA_DMA_API
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the battery tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
  • From: "Lan, Tianyu" <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the driver-core tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
  • From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
  • From: Joe Millenbach <jmillenbach@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
  • From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
  • From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
  • From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
  • From: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
  • From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
  • From: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
  • From: Joe Millenbach <jmillenbach@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
  • From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] watchdog: da9055_wdt needs to select WATCHDOG_CORE
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
  • From: "Lan, Tianyu" <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
  • From: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
  • From: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the tty tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jan 28
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the driver-core tree
  • From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the driver-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the driver-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the tty tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Boot crashes due to global async pending list
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• [next-20130124][next-20130125] Fix available for broken PM-suspend
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (kvm)
  • From: Avi Kivity <avi.kivity@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (BROKEN suspend)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23 (mtd/ubi and iio and crypto/crc32[c])
  • From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (kvm)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Crash with 9fdb04c "async: replace list of active domains with global list of pending items"
  • From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] extcon: max77693: Fix bug of build error related to INPUT subsystem
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 25 (kvm)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH next-20130124] Sound: pci: Fix unused variable warning in patch_sigmatel.c
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH next-20130124] Sound: pci: Fix unused variable warning in patch_sigmatel.c
  • From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH next-20130124] Sound: pci: Fix unused variable warning in patch_sigmatel.c
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jan 25
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Crash with 9fdb04c "async: replace list of active domains with global list of pending items"
  • From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] extcon: max77693: Fix bug of build error related to INPUT subsystem
  • From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 24 (extcon-max77693)
  • From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] serial: pch_uart: fix sysrq handling for pch_uart
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 24 (extcon-max77693)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (akpm tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH next-20130124] Sound: pci: Fix unused variable warning in patch_sigmatel.c
  • From: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (akpm tree related)
  • From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jan 24
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (akpm tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] serial: pch_uart: fix sysrq handling for pch_uart
  • From: Liang Li <liang.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23 (pch_uart.c)
  • From: Liang Li <liang.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23 (pch_uart.c)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23 (pch_uart.c)
  • From: Liang Li <liang.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23 (pch_uart.c)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• mmotm 2013-01-23-17-04 uploaded
  • From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the mips tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23 (hvc and virtio_console)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23 (mtd/ubi and iio and crypto/crc32[c])
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23 (pch_uart.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23 (mtd/ubi and iio and crypto/crc32[c])
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23 (mtd/ubi and iio and crypto/crc32[c])
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 23
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with Linus' tree
  • From: "Grumbach, Emmanuel" <emmanuel.grumbach@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
  • From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
• Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
  • From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the pm tree
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
  • From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pinctrl tree with the driver-core tree
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• AW: [PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix error caused by shifted mask
  • From: "GMEINER.Christian" <C.GMEINER@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix error caused by shifted mask
  • From: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 3/3] leds-ot200: Fix error caused by shifted mask
  • From: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the akpm tree
  • From: Tang Chen <tangchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jan 23
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the akpm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the leds tree
  • From: "Kim, Milo" <Milo.Kim@xxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the pm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pinctrl tree with the driver-core tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the pinctrl tree with the driver-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the net-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the leds tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the pm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the mips tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the mips tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
  • From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
  • From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (gpio-lw tree related)
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (gpio-lw tree related)
  • From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (gpio-lw tree related)
  • From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jan 22
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (gpio-lw tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
  • From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
• Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 21 (ntb_hw.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 21 (8250.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 21 (gpio-palmas.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
  • From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@xxxxxxx>
• Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
  • From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
• Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
  • From: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 (x509)
  • From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
  • From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the drm tree
  • From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
  • From: "Lan, Tianyu" <tianyu.lan@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2 1/1] page_alloc: Bootmem limit with movablecore_map
  • From: Tang Chen <tangchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (akpm tree related)
  • From: Tang Chen <tangchen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jan 21
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (akpm tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio-lw tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio-lw tree
  • From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the drm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the gpio-lw tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the usb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the security tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: WARNING: at drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:476 flush_to_ldisc()
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: jbd2: don't wake kjournald unnecessarily
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [next-20130118] Analyzing a call-trace reproducible with pm_test/freezer [ X86|RCU|TTY|EXT4FS|JBD2|PM related? ]
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [next-20130118] Analyzing a call-trace reproducible with pm_test/freezer [ X86|RCU|TTY|EXT4FS|JBD2|PM related? ]
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: WARNING: at drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:476 flush_to_ldisc()
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [next-20130118] Analyzing a call-trace reproducible with pm_test/freezer [ X86|RCU|TTY|EXT4FS|JBD2|PM related? ]
  • From: Ilya Zykov <ilya@xxxxxxx>
• Re: WARNING: at drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:476 flush_to_ldisc()
  • From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [next-20130118] Analyzing a call-trace reproducible with pm_test/freezer [ X86|RCU|TTY|EXT4FS|JBD2|PM related? ]
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [next-20130118] Analyzing a call-trace reproducible with pm_test/freezer [ X86|RCU|TTY|EXT4FS|JBD2|PM related? ]
  • From: Ilya Zykov <ilya@xxxxxxx>
• Re: WARNING: at drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:476 flush_to_ldisc()
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [next-20130118] Analyzing a call-trace reproducible with pm_test/freezer [ X86|RCU|TTY|EXT4FS|JBD2|PM related? ]
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [next-20130118] Analyzing a call-trace reproducible with pm_test/freezer [ X86|RCU|TTY|EXT4FS|JBD2|PM related? ]
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [next-20130118] Analyzing a call-trace reproducible with pm_test/freezer [ X86|RCU|TTY|EXT4FS|JBD2|PM related? ]
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 (acpi)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 (acpi)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 (acpi)
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 (acpi)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] tty: Correct tty buffer flush.
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 (acpi)
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN tty-next on suspend ]
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2013-01-18-15-48 uploaded
  • From: Zlatko Calusic <zlatko.calusic@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 (acpi)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH next-20130118 1/2] KEYS: Fix build-error when SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING=n
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH next-20130118 1/2] KEYS: Fix build-error when SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING=n
  • From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH next-20130118 2/2] KEYS: MODSIGN: Fix wrong select in MODULE_SIG Kconfig
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH next-20130118 1/2] KEYS: Fix build-error when SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING=n
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 (x509)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• mmotm 2013-01-18-15-48 uploaded
  • From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio-lw tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [MODSIGN: KEYS:]
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [MODSIGN: KEYS:]
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 (powerclamp)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [MODSIGN: KEYS:]
  • From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: devm_gpio_* support should not depend on GPIOLIB
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [ BROKEN suspend: jbd2|acpi|pm? ]
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [MODSIGN: KEYS:]
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 18 [MODSIGN: KEYS:]
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
  • From: "Kondratiev, Vladimir" <vkondrat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio-lw tree
  • From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2] gpio: devm_gpio_* support should not depend on GPIOLIB
  • From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jan 18
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the slave-dma tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the gpio-lw tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the driver-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the tty.current tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
  • From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
  • From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
  • From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the tty tree
  • From: Samuel Iglesias Gonsalvez <siglesias@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: error when fething the git.secretlab.ca trees
  • From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
  • From: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jan 17
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the tty tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the tty.current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: error when fething the git.secretlab.ca trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: error when fething the git.secretlab.ca trees
  • From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: error when fething the git.secretlab.ca trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
  • From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [3.8-{rc1,rc2}] ata1.00: failed to get Identify Device Data, Emask 0x1
  • From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 3.8-rc2 lockdep complains about console_lock vs. fb_notifier_list.rwsem
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [3.8-{rc1,rc2}] ata1.00: failed to get Identify Device Data, Emask 0x1
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 3.8-rc2 lockdep complains about console_lock vs. fb_notifier_list.rwsem
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 3.8-rc2 lockdep complains about console_lock vs. fb_notifier_list.rwsem
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [next-20130114] Call-trace in LTP (lite) madvise02 test (block|mm|vfs related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Tony Prisk <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jan 16
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Tony Prisk <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the slave-dma tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the slave-dma tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Why no Tree for Jan 15?
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jan 15
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the block tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [next-20130114] Call-trace in LTP (lite) madvise02 test (block|mm|vfs related?)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2013-01-11-15-47 (trouble starting kvm)
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the block tree
  • From: Asai Thambi S P <asamymuthupa@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Why no Tree for Jan 15?
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: Why no Tree for Jan 15?
  • From: Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Why no Tree for Jan 15?
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 14 (mtd)
  • From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [next-20130114] Call-trace in LTP (lite) madvise02 test (block|mm|vfs related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [next-20130114] Call-trace in LTP (lite) madvise02 test (block|mm|vfs related?)
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
  • From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] mm: fix BUG on madvise early failure
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] mm: fix BUG on madvise early failure
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] mm: fix BUG on madvise early failure
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [next-20130114] Call-trace in LTP (lite) madvise02 test (block|mm|vfs related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [next-20130114] Call-trace in LTP (lite) madvise02 test (block|mm|vfs related?)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 14 (mtd)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 14 (mtd)
  • From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [next-20130114] Call-trace in LTP (lite) madvise02 test (block|mm|vfs related?)
  • From: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the crypto tree
  • From: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 14 (wireless/ath9k)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 14 (mtd)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -next: no resume from suspend
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jan 14
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2013-01-11-15-47 uploaded (x86 asm-offsets broken)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the block tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the kbuild tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the crypto tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: change contacts for the kvm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2013-01-11-15-47 uploaded (x86 asm-offsets broken)
  • From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2013-01-11-15-47 (trouble starting kvm)
  • From: Zlatko Calusic <zlatko.calusic@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2013-01-11-15-47 uploaded (x86 asm-offsets broken)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2013-01-11-15-47 uploaded (x86 asm-offsets broken)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2013-01-11-15-47 uploaded (x86 asm-offsets broken)
  • From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree
  • From: wenxiong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: mmotm 2013-01-11-15-47 uploaded (x86 asm-offsets broken)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2013-01-11-15-47 uploaded (x86 asm-offsets broken)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] staging/sb105x: PARPORT config is not good enough must use PARPORT_PC
  • From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Request for tree inclusion
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 10 (staging/sb105x)
  • From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• mmotm 2013-01-11-15-47 uploaded
  • From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
  • From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 11 (pefile_parser)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 11 (vmci)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 11 (rcutree)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ia64 tree
  • From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 11 (rcutree)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree
  • From: Brian King <brking@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree
  • From: Brian King <brking@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the arm64 tree
  • From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the arm64 tree
  • From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: please cleanup the cpuidle tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: please cleanup the cpuidle tree
  • From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jan 11
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc tree related)
  • From: Michael Neuling <mikey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (powerpc tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the arm64 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the arm-soc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the xilinx tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Request for tree inclusion
  • From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the scsi tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: please cleanup the cpuidle tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ia64 tree
  • From: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the ia64 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
  • From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 10 (staging/sb105x)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 10 (staging/sb105x)
  • From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/pinctrl: grab default handles from device core
  • From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 10 (vmci)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 10 (vmci)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree
  • From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the kvm tree
  • From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: change contacts for the kvm tree
  • From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jan 10
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: change contacts for the kvm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the kvm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the tree
  • From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jan 9
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tegra tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the staging tree
  • From: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: comment in commit in the slave-dma tree (dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: comment in commit in the slave-dma tree (dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support)
  • From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: comment in commit in the slave-dma tree (dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support)
  • From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: comment in commit in the slave-dma tree (dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support)
  • From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] xtensa: pull signal definitions from signal-defs.h
  • From: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jan 8
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: comment in commit in the slave-dma tree (dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support)
  • From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the staging tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the staging tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the drop-experimental tree with Linus' and the net-next trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the drop-experimental tree with the net-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the staging tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
  • From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
  • From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: please cleanup the cpuidle tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
  • From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: please cleanup the cpuidle tree
  • From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: comment in commit in the slave-dma tree (dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: comment in commit in the slave-dma tree (dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support)
  • From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: comment in commit in the slave-dma tree (dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: please cleanup the cpuidle tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 7 (rcutorture)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the slave-dma tree
  • From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jan 7
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the slave-dma tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2013-01-04-15-43 uploaded (aio)
  • From: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix error caused by shifted mask
  • From: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2013-01-04-15-43 uploaded (aio)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core.current tree with Linus tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• mmotm 2013-01-04-15-43 uploaded
  • From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 4 (net/bridge)
  • From: Rami Rosen <roszenrami@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 4 (net/bridge)
  • From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 4 (net/bridge)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Add #includes needed to permit the removal of asm/system.h - sha1 96f951edb1f1bdbbc99b0cd458f9808bb83d58ae
  • From: Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pekey tree
  • From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jan 4
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the pekey tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: bad merge in driver-core.current tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: bad merge in driver-core.current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 3 (qlcnic)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 3 (qlcnic)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 2 (netfilter)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 3 (broadcom/bnx2x)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Add #includes needed to permit the removal of asm/system.h - sha1 96f951edb1f1bdbbc99b0cd458f9808bb83d58ae
  • From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Add #includes needed to permit the removal of asm/system.h - sha1 96f951edb1f1bdbbc99b0cd458f9808bb83d58ae
  • From: Michal Simek <monstr@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the s390 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net-next tree related)
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the s390 tree
  • From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jan 3
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net-next tree related)
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (net-next tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 2 (netfilter)
  • From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the pinctrl tree with the driver-core.current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 2 (netfilter)
  • From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the s390 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 2 (netfilter)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Jan 2
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with the mips tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the drivers-x86 tree with the driver-core.current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the v4l-dvb tree with the driver-core.current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the s390 tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core.current tree with Linus tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the pinctrl tree
  • From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Dec 24
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the driver-core.current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the pinctrl tree with the driver-core.current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the slave-dma tree with the driver-core.current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core.current tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core.current tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core.current tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next stats (Was: Linux 3.8-rc1)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-12-20-16-15 uploaded
  • From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the pinctrl tree
  • From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Dec 21
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the pinctrl tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• mmotm 2012-12-20-16-15 uploaded
  • From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the infiniband tree
  • From: Vipul Pandya <vipul@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Dec 20
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the signal tree with Linus' tree and the cris tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the infiniband tree
  • From: Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] f2fs: add missing #include <linux/prefetch.h>
  • From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the infiniband tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the modules tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] f2fs: add missing #include <linux/prefetch.h>
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 19 (mm/compaction.c)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the modules tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Dec 19
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the fsnotify tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the modules tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the slave-dma tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ PATCH] Add rcu user eqs exception hooks for async page fault
  • From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
  • From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Dec 18
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 3.7.0 3/9] i82975x_edac.c: cleanup debug code
  • From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 3.7.0 8/9] i82975x_edac: fix wrong offset reported
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -mm git tree for since-3.7 is open (was: mmotm 2012-12-14-17-51 uploaded)
  • From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 3.7.0 3/9] i82975x_edac.c: cleanup debug code
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
• -mm git tree for since-3.7 is open (was: mmotm 2012-12-14-17-51 uploaded)
  • From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 3.7.0 2/9] i82975x_edac.c: fix layers initialisation
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix error caused by shifted mask
  • From: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Dec 17
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the btrfs tree
  • From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the btrfs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the btrfs tree
  • From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the btrfs tree
  • From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the btrfs tree
  • From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the btrfs tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 3.7.0 5/9] i82975x_edac: optimise mode detection
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 3.7.0 1/9] i82975x_edac.c: fix style errors
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 3.7.0 9/9] i82975x_edac: set sw-scrub mode, bump rev.
  • From: Arvind R <arvino55@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 3.7.0 8/9] i82975x_edac: fix wrong offset reported
  • From: Arvind R <arvino55@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 3.7.0 7/9] i82975x_edac: correct dimm label initialisation
  • From: Arvind R <arvino55@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 3.7.0 6/9] i82975x_edac: unmap pcibar after init
  • From: Arvind R <arvino55@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 3.7.0 5/9] i82975x_edac: optimise mode detection
  • From: Arvind R <arvino55@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 3.7.0 4/9] i82975x_edac.c: remove unnecessary function
  • From: Arvind R <arvino55@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 3.7.0 3/9] i82975x_edac.c: cleanup debug code
  • From: Arvind R <arvino55@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 3.7.0 2/9] i82975x_edac.c: fix layers initialisation
  • From: Arvind R <arvino55@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 3.7.0 1/9] i82975x_edac.c: fix style errors
  • From: Arvind R <arvino55@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 3.7.0 0/9] i82975x_edac: driver cleanup
  • From: Arvind R <arvino55@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-12-14-17-51 uploaded (staging/sb105x)
  • From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-12-14-17-51 uploaded (staging/sb105x)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• mmotm 2012-12-14-17-51 uploaded
  • From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 14 (net/can)
  • From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 14 (net/can)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: manual merge of the l2-mtd tree with Linus' tree
  • From: "Kumar, Anil" <anilkumar.v@xxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Dec 14
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: some merging notes
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: unusual update of the security tree
  • From: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] staging: Make SystemBase PCI Multiport UART only for x86
  • From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: fetch failure the xilinx tree
  • From: John Linn <John.Linn@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (tty tree related)
  • From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: fetch failure the xilinx tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the xtensa tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (tty tree related)
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (tty tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the l2-mtd tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@xxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix error caused by shifted mask
  • From: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: reminder 2
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: reminder 2
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: reminder 2
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Dec 13
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: manual merge of the l2-mtd tree with Linus' tree
  • From: "Kumar, Anil" <anilkumar.v@xxxxxx>
• linux-next: reminder 2
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: unusual update of the security tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the virtio tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the l2-mtd tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the cpuidle tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: reminder
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: no release today (20121212)
  • From: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: no release today (20121212)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: some merging notes
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: recent rebases
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: some merging notes
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: recent rebases
  • From: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: recent rebases
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the gpio-lw tree with the driver-core tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Dec 11
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the gpio-lw tree with the driver-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the virtio tree
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the pci tree
  • From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the pci tree
  • From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: fetch failure the xilinx tree
  • From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree
  • From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Dec 10
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build warning after merge of the pci tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the akpm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the tip tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the pci tree
  • From: "Grumbach, Emmanuel" <emmanuel.grumbach@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the sound-asoc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the regulator tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the virtio tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the virtio tree with the net-next tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the pci tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: fetch failure the xilinx tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: mmotm 2012-12-07-16-53 uploaded (drivers/video/console/fbcon)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• mmotm 2012-12-07-16-53 uploaded
  • From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 7 (ext4)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Dec 7
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree with the mmc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the mips tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the iommu tree
  • From: Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the iommu tree
  • From: Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.ramirez@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the iommu tree
  • From: Paul Walmsley <paul@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: unusual update of the security tree
  • From: Casey Schaufler <casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the iommu tree
  • From: Omar Ramirez Luna <omar.ramirez@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: unusual update of the security tree
  • From: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: unusual update of the security tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: unusual update of the security tree
  • From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix error caused by shifted mask
  • From: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: unusual update of the security tree
  • From: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch] propagate name change to comments in kernel source
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Dec 6
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch] propagate name change to comments in kernel source
  • From: Nadia Yvette Chambers <nyc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch] propagate name change to comments in kernel source
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• mmotm 2012-12-05-16-59 uploaded
  • From: akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• [patch] propagate name change to comments in kernel source
  • From: Nadia Yvette Chambers <nyc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm64 tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ccache: FATAL: Could not create /scratch/kisskb/ccache
  • From: Michael Ellerman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Dec 5
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v3] Add rcu user eqs exception hooks for async page fault
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (ext4 tree related)
  • From: Tao Ma <tm@xxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v3] Add rcu user eqs exception hooks for async page fault
  • From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the iommu tree
  • From: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the iommu tree
  • From: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for Dec 4
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (ext4 tree related)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [RFC PATCH v3] Add rcu user eqs exception hooks for async page fault
  • From: Li Zhong <zhong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the rr-fixes tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>