Re: [PATCH] leds-ot200: Fix misbehavior caused by wrong bit masks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



ping
--
Christian Gmeiner, MSc


2013/2/23 Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@xxxxxxxxx>:
> 2013/2/15 Bryan Wu <cooloney@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Christian Gmeiner
>> <christian.gmeiner@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> During the development of this driver an in-house register
>>> documentation was used. The last weeks some integration tests
>>> were done and this problem was found. It turned out that
>>> the released register documentation is wrong.
>>>
>>> The fix is very simple: shift all masks by one.
>>>
>>> Our customers can control LEDs from userspace via Java,
>>> C++ or what every. They have running/working applications where
>>> they want to control led_3 but led_2 get's used.
>>> I got a bug report in our in-house bug tracker so it would be
>>> great to fix this upstream.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Thanks, Christian.
>>
>> And Andrew, are you going to take care of this patch? Or I will merge this.
>>
>
> Whats the current state of the patch? Hope we can get it into 3.9 :)
>
> --
> Christian Gmeiner, MSc
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux