Hi, On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:10:30 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, David Rientjes wrote: > > > I don't think that's it, linux/kexec.h already gets included indirectly. > > The problem is that CONFIG_KEXEC isn't set so the definition in kexec.h is > > meaningless. > > > > This comes from "vmcore: check NT_VMCORE_PAD as a mark indicating the end > > of ELF note buffer" merged through the -mm tree. I've added the patch's > > author and Andrew to the cc. > > > > How can this be protected by CONFIG_KEXEC? > > These patches were removed from -mm today so it should no longer be a > problem. What exactly are "these patches" so that I can remove them from my copy of the mmotm tree (assuming that Andrew does not get a new mmotm released in the next hour or so). -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgpwyF95IQSlf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
