On 03/20/2013 03:42 PM, Bill Pemberton wrote: > Ok, for the unopened ports there *should* never be any actual data to > push so the push is really doing nothing anyhow in these cases. It's > coming from the device sending an initial change port command. > > Anyhow, so my patch adding more is_open logic can be dropped and then > yours will apply fine. What's the best way for me to handle this? > Send a revert for my patch so yours will apply or send an updated > version of your patch that removes my additions? Asking Greg to revert should suffice. I commented on that patch, but in a different thread, so Greg missed the comment the patch is not needed IIRC. What was the title of the patch, I cannot find it immediately :/? -- js suse labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
