Hi Arnd, On Friday 22 February 2013 04:43 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:07:56 +0530 Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>>> I guess you'll have to do something similar for arch/metag, and Vineet >>>> will do it for arch/arc. >> >> After getting the tip-bot msg about Stephen's patch for -mm, I never saw it in >> -next and thus was not sure how when it will start showing up in -next. > > It arrived in next-21030220. > >>>> Stephen's patch is currently in Andrew's tree, and I don't see an easy >>>> way to coordinate this. The patch we will need once both are merged >>>> is below. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> >>> >>> FWIW: >>> Acked-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx> (for arch/metag) >>> >> Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@xxxxxxxxxxxx> (for arch/arc) >> >> So this means Stephen's patch - once merged will take care of existing in-tree >> arches and your's will take care of metag/arc. > > The easiest way would be to put the follow up patches in Andrew's patch > set (since it is still based on top of linux-next). It usually is merged > pretty late, so I would get your own trees merged ASAP and this can be > taken care of when Andrew sends his patch set to Linus. > Have you queued up this change via one of your trees already for 3.9-rcX ? If not, I can fold it in with a bunch of Kconfig cleanups for ARC (GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK, HAVE_IRQ_WORK), given that those bits are already in linus' tree. Thx, -Vineet -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
