Hi, On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:07:56 +0530 Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> I guess you'll have to do something similar for arch/metag, and Vineet > >> will do it for arch/arc. > > After getting the tip-bot msg about Stephen's patch for -mm, I never saw it in > -next and thus was not sure how when it will start showing up in -next. It arrived in next-21030220. > >> Stephen's patch is currently in Andrew's tree, and I don't see an easy > >> way to coordinate this. The patch we will need once both are merged > >> is below. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> > > > > FWIW: > > Acked-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx> (for arch/metag) > > > Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@xxxxxxxxxxxx> (for arch/arc) > > So this means Stephen's patch - once merged will take care of existing in-tree > arches and your's will take care of metag/arc. The easiest way would be to put the follow up patches in Andrew's patch set (since it is still based on top of linux-next). It usually is merged pretty late, so I would get your own trees merged ASAP and this can be taken care of when Andrew sends his patch set to Linus. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgpQcfUrHVICD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
