On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 08:08:19PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Heilo, > > On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:38:44 +0100 Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > your commit "taint: add explicit flag to show whether lock dep is still OK." > > missed to change the s390 invocation of add_taint(): > > > > CC arch/s390/kernel/dumpstack.o > > arch/s390/kernel/dumpstack.c: In function ‘die’: > > arch/s390/kernel/dumpstack.c:228:2: error: too few arguments to function ‘add_taint’ > > > > Could be that this is a merge issue since dumpstack.c is a new file which > > contains stuff that was formerly in arch/s390/kernel/traps.c > > The commit (9ff3d92a818e "s390/dumpstack: fix call chain walking" in > today's version of the s390 tree) that adds dumpstack.c has add_taint() > with 2 arguments removed from traps.c and add_taint() with one argument > added to dumpstack.c ... and add_taint() already has 2 arguments in that > tree ... Ouch! Looks like our work flow still sucks. Sorry for the noise and blaming others, we'll fix it up! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
