>From a0265a7f5161b6cb55e82b71edb236bbe0d9b3ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:55:42 -0700 699ce097efe ("workqueue: implement and use pwq_adjust_max_active()") replaced the only workqueue_freezing usage outside freezer callbacks with a POOL_FREEZING test. This makes workqueue_freezing unused when !CONFIG_FREEZER leading to a compiler warning. Define workqueue_freezing iff CONFIG_FREEZER. Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> --- kernel/workqueue.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index e38d035..775c2f4 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -261,7 +261,9 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pwq_lock); /* protects pool_workqueues */ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(wq_mayday_lock); /* protects wq->maydays list */ static LIST_HEAD(workqueues); /* WQ: list of all workqueues */ +#ifdef CONFIG_FREEZER static bool workqueue_freezing; /* WQ: have wqs started freezing? */ +#endif /* the per-cpu worker pools */ static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct worker_pool [NR_STD_WORKER_POOLS], -- 1.8.1.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html