On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:11 PM, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:05:19 +0100
>
>> The sparc64 part is still OK as it eventually calls __cmpxchg_u64(),
>> isn't it?
>
> Yes, that part is OK.
>
>> Do you want me to send a new patch for that part only, or will you just
>> remove the sparc32 part?
>
> Please send a new patch, thank you.
OK, done.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
