Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the workqueues tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello, Andrew.

On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:46:24PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Tejun, can you please confirm that this is how worker_pool_assign_id()
> should look in linux-next?
> 
> static int worker_pool_assign_id(struct worker_pool *pool)
> {
> 	int ret;
> 
> 	do {
> 		idr_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
> 		spin_lock_irq(&workqueue_lock);
> 		ret = idr_alloc(&worker_pool_idr, pool, 0, 0, GFP_NOWAIT);
> 		if (ret >= 0)
> 			pool->id = ret;
> 		spin_unlock_irq(&workqueue_lock);

		idr_preload_end();

> 	} while (ret == -EAGAIN);
> 
> 	return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
> }

Other than that, it looks good to me.

Thanks!

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux