On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 09:20:48 -0400 > From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> > To: Lukáš Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the ext4 tree > > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 03:18:32PM +0200, Lukáš Czerner wrote: > > I am afraid I do not understand why this is happening. The commit > > simply replaces ext4_get_group_no_and_offset() with > > ext4_get_group_number() which has the similar definition in the same > > header file. Maybe someone knows what this is all about ? > > I've fixed this up already in the ext4 tree. The problem is that you > defined the function ext4_get_group_number() as "inline", but the > function body was only in fs/ext4/balloc.c. I have no idea why gcc > wasn't complaining about this on x86, but the fix was to simply > declare the function as "extern", not as "inline". > > - Ted > Ok, that's why I have not seen it in ext4 tree :). I do not know why I did it, but it was obviously wrong. Thanks for fixing it. -Lukas