> Hi Len, > > On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:34:06 -0500 Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > BTW. Rafael's "pm" tree now carries the ACPI patch stream, so it is > > probably a mis-representation to call my tree the "acpi" tree. > > My tree is primarily focused on the "idle" part of pm these days. > > OK, I have renamed your tree to "idle". Thanks for fixing the conflicts. The new ACPICA release contains a patch renaming the PM_TIMER_FREQUENCY macro. A further CA release patch cleans up the repo (pm/linux-next) where the release patch set based on. The conflicts would happen if other repos contained new codes using the old macro definition. Thanks -Lv -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html