Linux Next

• Thread Index

• Re: new xfs git tree
  • From: Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 23 (kvm)
  • From: Alexander Graf <agraf@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 23 (kvm)
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: X200 suspend issue / linux-next: Tree for January 21
  • From: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: X200 suspend issue / linux-next: Tree for January 21
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ide tree with the driver-core tree
  • From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: X200 suspend issue / linux-next: Tree for January 21
  • From: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx>
• Re: new xfs git tree
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] net: pppoe - stop using proc internals
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] pppol2tp: stop using proc internals
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] sysrq: include interrupt.h instead of irq.h
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] sysrq: include interrupt.h instead of irq.h
  • From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] sysrq: include interrupt.h instead of irq.h
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree with the ftace tree
  • From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 26
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree with the ftace tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ide tree with the driver-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ide tree with the driver-core tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the ide tree with the driver-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] net: pppoe - stop using proc internals
  • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] pppol2tp: stop using proc internals
  • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] pppol2tp: stop using proc internals
  • From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [patch -next] 9pnet_rdma build error
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 23 (drivers/watchdog/cpwd.c:411: error: 'inode' undeclared (first use in this function))
  • From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] kmemtrace: fix printk format warnings
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 23 (kvm)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: proc tree build failure
  • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: proc tree build failure
  • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: proc tree build failure
  • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: proc tree build failure
  • From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kmemcheck tree with the x86 tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kmemcheck tree with the x86 tree
  • From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with the pxa tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Rebooting at boot: linux-next: Tree for January 22
  • From: Nico -telmich- Schottelius <nico-linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 23
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: proc tree build failure
  • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: proc tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree with the kmemcheck tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the sparseirq tree with the cpus4096 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemcheck tree with the x86 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with the pxa tree
  • From: Ian Molton <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with the pxa tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip-core tree with the x86 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 22 (staging/android)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 22 (staging/android)
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: ide tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 22 (staging/rtl8187se)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 22 (staging/rtl8187se)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 22 (staging/android)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 22 (staging/altpcichdma)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 22 (staging/rtl8187se)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core.current tree build failure
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: ide tree build failure
  • From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 22
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: v4l-dvb tree build warning
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: driver-core.current tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: quota tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: ide tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the i2c tree with the pxa tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] regulator: Hoist struct regulator_dev out of core to fix notifiers
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] sysrq: include interrupt.h instead of irq.h
  • From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] regulator: Hoist struct regulator_dev out of core to fix notifiers
  • From: Liam Girdwood <lrg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: X200 suspend issue / linux-next: Tree for January 21
  • From: Nico -telmich- Schottelius <nico-linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: voltage tree build failure
  • From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] regulator: Hoist struct regulator_dev out of core to fix notifiers
  • From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] regulator: Hoist struct regulator_dev out of core to fix notifiers
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] sysrq: include interrupt.h instead of irq.h
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 21
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: voltage tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with Linus' treee
  • From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cpufreq tree with the cpus4096 tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with Linus' treee
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 20
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: cpufreq tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree with the ftrace tree
  • From: Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree with the ftrace and slab trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: crypto tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: cpufreq tree build failure
  • From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cpufreq tree with the cpus4096 tree
  • From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: crypto tree build failure
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the proc tree with the security-testing tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: crypto tree build failure
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree with the ftrace tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: crypto tree build failure
  • From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: cpufreq tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the cpufreq tree with the cpus4096 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: crypto tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 2.6.30 material is OK now?
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with Linus' treee
  • From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with Linus' treee
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• 2.6.30 material is OK now?
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: unable to fetch device-mapper quilt series
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 19 (DST)
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 19 (DST)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 19 (DST)
  • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 19 (x86_32 sub-arch)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 19 (DST)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: unable to fetch nfs or nfsd trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: unable to fetch nfs or nfsd trees
  • From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: hid tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: hid tree build failure
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 19
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: quota tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: hid tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the cpus4096 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the stackprotector tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: FS-Cache fixes for IA64 export and AFS linkage
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: FS-Cache fixes for IA64 export and AFS linkage
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• FS-Cache fixes for IA64 export and AFS linkage
  • From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build problem with nfs tree (Was: Re: [mmotm][PATCH] fix ia64 build error)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build problem with nfs tree (Was: Re: [mmotm][PATCH] fix ia64 build error)
  • From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cris tree
  • From: Jesper Nilsson <Jesper.Nilsson@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build problem with nfs tree (Was: Re: [mmotm][PATCH] fix ia64 build error)
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build problem with nfs tree (Was: Re: [mmotm][PATCH] fix ia64 build error)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build problem with nfs tree (Was: Re: [mmotm][PATCH] fix ia64 build error)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build problem with nfs tree (Was: Re: [mmotm][PATCH] fix ia64 build error)
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: tree build failure
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: tree build failure
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: tree build failure
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: tree build failure
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 16
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build problem with nfs tree (Was: Re: [mmotm][PATCH] fix ia64 build error)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build problem with nfs tree (Was: Re: [mmotm][PATCH] fix ia64 build error)
  • From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cris tree
  • From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build problem with nfs tree (Was: Re: [mmotm][PATCH] fix ia64 build error)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the ocfs2 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build problem with nfs tree (Was: Re: [mmotm][PATCH] fix ia64 build error)
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 15 (afs/fscache)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build problem with nfs tree (Was: Re: [mmotm][PATCH] fix ia64 build error)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the cris tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 15 (afs/fscache)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree
  • From: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD_FAILURE] next-20090115 - s390x - mm/kmemleak.c
  • From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD_FAILURE] next-20090115 - s390x - mm/kmemleak.c
  • From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD_FAILURE] next-20090115 - s390x - mm/kmemleak.c
  • From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD_FAILURE] next-20090115 - s390x - mm/kmemleak.c
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD_FAILURE] next-20090115 - s390x - mm/kmemleak.c
  • From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD_FAILURE] next-20090115 - s390x - mm/kmemleak.c
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree
  • From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD_FAILURE] next-20090115 - s390x - mm/kmemleak.c
  • From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD_FAILURE] next-20090115 - s390x - mm/kmemleak.c
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• [BUILD_FAILURE] next-20090115 - s390x - mm/kmemleak.c
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree
  • From: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 15
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: unable to fetch nfs or nfsd trees
  • From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: unable to fetch nfs or nfsd trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: quota tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 14 (multimedia/firesat-rc)
  • From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 14 (multimedia/firesat-rc)
  • From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 14 (multimedia/firesat-rc)
  • From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20090114 - drivers/staging/meilhaus
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20090114 - drivers/staging/meilhaus
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20090114 - drivers/staging/meilhaus
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
• [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20090114 - drivers/staging/meilhaus
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20090114 - powerpc - drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 14 (multimedia/firesat-rc)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: quota tree build failure
  • From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: mfd tree build failure
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 14
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: quota tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20090113 - drivers/scsi/aha1542.c builds with CONFIG_PPC=y
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20090113 - powerpc - kernel/idle.c fails at cpu_idle()
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 13 (gfs2 build error)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] next-20090113 - scsi_debug fails with CONFIG_CRC_T10DIF=n
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20090113 - drivers/scsi/aha1542.c builds with CONFIG_PPC=y
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] next-20090113 - scsi_debug fails with CONFIG_CRC_T10DIF=n
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20090113 - drivers/scsi/aha1542.c builds with CONFIG_PPC=y
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20090113 - powerpc - kernel/idle.c fails at cpu_idle()
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 13
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: mfd tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] scsi_debug: needs CRC_T10DIF
  • From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: [PATCH -next] libfc: needs CRC32
  • From: "Love, Robert W" <robert.w.love@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix cpufreq drivers after cpufreq core changes
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: "Steve French" <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: "Steve French" <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: "Steve French" <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: "Steve French" <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: "Steve French" <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (afs/fscache)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: "Steve French" <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] scsi_debug: needs CRC_T10DIF
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] libfc: needs CRC32
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix cpufreq drivers after cpufreq core changes
  • From: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: drm tree build failure
  • From: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: mfd tree build failure
  • From: Balaji Rao <balajirrao@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Michael Ellerman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix cpufreq drivers after cpufreq core changes
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 12
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: drm tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: mfd tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] powerpc: Fix cpufreq drivers after cpufreq core changes
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] jbd2: fix printk format warning
  • From: Simon Holm Thøgersen <odie@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] jbd2: fix printk format warning
  • From: Simon Holm Thøgersen <odie@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] jbd2: fix printk format warning
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 8 (percpu)
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] cacheinfo: rename cache_dir per-cpu variable
  • From: Nathan Lynch <ntl@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (MTD)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 9
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: ocfs2 tree build failure
  • From: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@xxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: import of rr tree failed
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 8 (percpu)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 8 (multimedia/cx88)
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 4/4] i2400m/usb: wrap USB power saving in #ifdef CONFIG_PM
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 3/4] wimax: testing for rfkill support should also test for CONFIG_RFKILL_MODULE
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2/4] wimax: fix kconfig interactions with rfkill and input layers
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/4] wimax: fix '#ifndef CONFIG_BUG' layout to avoid warning
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 8 (multimedia/cx88)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 8 (percpu)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the nommu tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the nommu tree
  • From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 7 (wimax: more)
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the nommu tree
  • From: Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: rr tree build warnings
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 3/3] wimax: testing for rfkill support should also test for CONFIG_RFKILL_MODULE
  • From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 8
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/3] wimax: fix '#ifndef CONFIG_BUG' layout to avoid warning
  • From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 2/3] wimax: fix kconfig interactions with rfkill and input layers
  • From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 0/3] wimax: Kbuild / rfkill-build fixes (v2)
  • From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: rr tree build warning
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the nommu tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: ocfs2 tree build failure
  • From: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: ocfs2 tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 0/4] wimax: Kbuild / rfkill-build / PM fixes (v3)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5 (multimedia #3)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5 (multimedia #3)
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: Michael Marineau <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: ftrace tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 1/4] firmware: convert e100 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Suspend issues on all latest kernels!
  • From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxx>
• Suspend issues on all latest kernels!
  • From: Nico -telmich- Schottelius <nico-linux-20090106@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 4/4] i2400m/usb: wrap USB power saving in #ifdef CONFIG_PM
  • From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 3/4] wimax: testing for rfkill support should also test for CONFIG_RFKILL_MODULE
  • From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 2/4] wimax: fix kconfig interactions with rfkill and input layers
  • From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/4] wimax: fix '#ifndef CONFIG_BUG' layout to avoid warning
  • From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 0/4] wimax: Kbuild / rfkill-build / PM fixes (v3)
  • From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 7 (wimax: more)
  • From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 1/4] firmware: convert e100 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: "Jeff Kirsher" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5 (multimedia #3)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 1/4] firmware: convert e100 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: "Jeff Kirsher" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 7 (ath9k)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 7 (wimax: more)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: strncat() misuse (was: Re: dm_attr_{name,uuid}_show buffer overflow? (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5))
  • From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: ftrace tree build failure
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (wimax errs)
  • From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 7
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: Michael Marineau <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: rr tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (staging/android #2)
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: ftrace tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (staging/android #2)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (staging/android)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (staging/altpciehdma)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (staging/comedi)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5 (multimedia #3)
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (wimax errs)
  • From: Iñaky Pérez-González <inaky.perez-gonzalez@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (wimax errs)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (MTD)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (MTD)
  • From: Alexey Korolev <akorolev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (MTD)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5 (multimedia #2)
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5 (multimedia build errors)
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 6
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: firmware tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: rr tree build warnings
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: rr tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: strncat() misuse (was: Re: dm_attr_{name,uuid}_show buffer overflow? (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5))
  • From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: strncat() misuse (was: Re: dm_attr_{name,uuid}_show buffer overflow? (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5))
  • From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the pci tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• strncat() misuse (was: Re: dm_attr_{name,uuid}_show buffer overflow? (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5))
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• dm_attr_{name,uuid}_show buffer overflow? (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5)
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] jbd2: fix printk format warning
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5 (multimedia #3)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5 (multimedia #2)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5 (multimedia build errors)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5 (dm-target)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: "Jaswinder Singh Rajput" <jaswinderlinux@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: "Jaswinder Singh Rajput" <jaswinderlinux@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: "Jaswinder Singh Rajput" <jaswinderlinux@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for Squashfs
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for Squashfs
  • From: Phillip Lougher <phillip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for Squashfs
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Pull request for Squashfs
  • From: Phillip Lougher <phillip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 5
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 1/4] firmware: convert e100 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 1/4] firmware: convert e100 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: "Jeff Kirsher" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 4/4] starfire: use request_firmware()
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 2/4] firmware: convert acenic driver to request_firmware() -- without firmware data
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 1/4] firmware: convert e100 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: kvm tree build failure
  • From: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: kvm tree build failure
  • From: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH V2 00/16] Squashfs: compressed read-only filesystem
  • From: "Leon Woestenberg" <leon.woestenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: kvm tree build failure
  • From: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH V2 00/16] Squashfs: compressed read-only filesystem
  • From: Phillip Lougher <phillip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security-testing tree
  • From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] 9p: fix RDMA dependency
  • From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] sunrpc: fix RDMA dependency
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] 9p: fix RDMA dependency
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 2
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
  • From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 2
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree
  • From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: ftrace tree build failure
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: ftrace tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081231 - S390x kernel panics while bootup at init_sched_build_groups()
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20081230 - S390 - tape drive fails to build with !CONFIG_BLOCK
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 2
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: ftrace tree build failure
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: ftrace tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mtd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: kvm tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: "Kyle Moffett" <kyle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 30
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: "Muntz, Daniel" <Dan.Muntz@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [BUG] next-20081231 -powerpc - panic at tasklet_kill_immediate()
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [BUG] next-20081231 - S390x kernel panics while bootup at init_sched_build_groups()
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for December 31
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20081230 - S390 - tape drive fails to build with !CONFIG_BLOCK
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 30
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: timers tree build failure
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: timers tree build failure
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch] powerpc: change u64/s64 to a long long integer type
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch] powerpc: change u64/s64 to a long long integer type
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security-testing tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree
  • From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sched tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ofa-general] Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: "Muntz, Daniel" <Dan.Muntz@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ofa-general] Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ofa-general] Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 1/4] firmware: convert e100 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: "Jeff Kirsher" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: "Muntz, Daniel" <Dan.Muntz@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe/libfc)
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe/libfc)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe/libfc)
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe/libfc)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] clean up of netif_rx_reschedule() changes in drivers
  • From: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/1] cxgb3i - remove use of skb->sp
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for December 30
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: scsi tree build failure
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next v2] cxgb3i: use same dependencies & selects as CHELSIO_T3
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: scsi tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [BUILD-FAILURE] fcoe driver build fails with !CONFIG_PCI
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ofa-general] Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe/libfc)
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ofa-general] Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemcheck tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemcheck tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 00/14] Kernel memory leak detector
  • From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -net-next 2/4] firmware: convert acenic driver to request_firmware() -- without firmware data
  • From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -net-next 4/4] starfire: use request_firmware()
  • From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -net-next 1/4] firmware: convert e100 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -net-next 0/4] firmware patches for net drivers
  • From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (cxgb3i)
  • From: Karen Xie <kxie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/1] cxgb3i - remove use of skb->sp
  • From: Karen Xie <kxie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe/libfc)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] clean up of netif_rx_reschedule() changes in drivers
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 00/14] Kernel memory leak detector
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: rr_cpumask tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: "Muntz, Daniel" <Dan.Muntz@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: rr_cpumask tree build failure
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (cxgb3i)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next v2] cxgb3i: use same dependencies & selects as CHELSIO_T3
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next v2] cxgb3i: use same dependencies & selects as CHELSIO_T3
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (cxgb3i)
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ofa-general] Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe)
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe)
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next v2] cxgb3i: use same dependencies & selects as CHELSIO_T3
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the boot-params tree
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: rr tree build failure
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] cxgb3i: use same dependencies as CHELSIO_T3
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (cxgb3i)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Aleksey Senin <alekseys@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: rr_cpumask tree build failure
  • From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for December 29
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: rr_cpumask tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] clean up of netif_rx_reschedule() changes in drivers
  • From: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: rr tree build failure
  • From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the boot-params tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the boot-params tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the boot-params tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the uwb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the uwb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] clean up of netif_rx_reschedule() changes in drivers
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] clean up of netif_rx_reschedule() changes in drivers
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: timers tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Aleksey Senin <alekseys@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: timers tree build failure
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: "Aleksey Senin" <alekseys@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: xfs tree build warnings
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: xfs tree build warnings
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• linux-next: xfs tree build warnings
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: rr tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: kvm tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build warnings
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build warnings
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the creds tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build warnings
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: timers tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the timers tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: origin tree build warnings
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] kbuild, sparseirq: work around GCC bug with __weak aliases
  • From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: rr tree import failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: 2.6.30 inclusions
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: "Yinghai Lu" <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] kbuild, sparseirq: work around GCC bug with __weak aliases
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] kgdb: more barrier in blank weak function
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] kgdb: more barrier in blank weak function
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] perf_counter: more barrier in blank weak function
  • From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] kgdb: more barrier in blank weak function
  • From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] perf_counter: more barrier in blank weak function
  • From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] kbuild, sparseirq: work around GCC bug with __weak aliases
  • From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] kbuild, sparseirq: work around GCC bug with __weak aliases
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree
  • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
  • From: Ken Chen <kenchen@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
  • From: Ken Chen <kenchen@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] sparc64: fix unsigned long long warnings in drivers
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: no linux-next release for Dec 23
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mtd tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: testing (Was: Re: linux-next: scsi-post-merge tree build failure)
  • From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
  • From: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: testing (Was: Re: linux-next: scsi-post-merge tree build failure)
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
  • From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch] powerpc: change u64/s64 to a long long integer type
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch] powerpc: change u64/s64 to a long long integer type
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• testing (Was: Re: linux-next: scsi-post-merge tree build failure)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch] powerpc: change u64/s64 to a long long integer type
  • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch] powerpc: change u64/s64 to a long long integer type
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (patch: kernel-doc notation)
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
  • From: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch] powerpc: change u64/s64 to a long long integer type
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
  • From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
  • From: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
  • From: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: scsi-post-merge tree build failure
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Firmware patches for SCSI
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Firmware patches for SCSI
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: scsi-post-merge tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: no linux-next for Dec 22
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: scsi-post-merge tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: kvm tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: sched tree build warning
  • From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: sched tree build warning
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: sched tree build warning
  • From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: sched tree build warning
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: sched tree build warning
  • From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
• [patch] powerpc: change u64/s64 to a long long integer type
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Firmware patches for SCSI
  • From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] m68k: Kill several external declarations in source files (was: Re: linux-next: boot-params tree build failure)
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: sched tree build warning
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>