Linux Next

• Thread Index

• Re: linux-next: Tree for March 2 (wireless/b43)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: Andy Grover <andy.grover@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Linus' tree build warnings
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Linus' tree build warnings
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: kvm tree build warnings
  • From: Sheng Yang <sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Linus' tree build warnings
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the firmware tree with the tree
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for March 2
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: kvm tree build warnings
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the firmware tree with the tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the firmware tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the firmware tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: v4l-dvb tree build failure
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: v4l-dvb tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: v4l-dvb tree build failure
  • From: Michael Krufky <mkrufky@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: v4l-dvb tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with Linus' tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for February 27
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] at76c50x-usb: use dev_name() instead of struct device.bus_id
  • From: Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@xxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the x86 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] net: fix hp-plus build error
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] net: fix hp-plus build error
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: wireless tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Staging/p9auth] Feb 26 Next: build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Staging/p9auth] Feb 26 Next: build failure
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Staging/p9auth] Feb 26 Next: build failure
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Staging/p9auth] Feb 26 Next: build failure
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Staging/p9auth] Feb 26 Next: build failure
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree with the tree
  • From: Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx>
• [Staging/p9auth] Feb 26 Next: build failure
  • From: "Sachin P. Sant" <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: sound tree build failure
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: sound tree build failure
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: sound tree build failure
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for February 26
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree with the tree
  • From: Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: sound tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 24 (ide-atapi/ide-cd build errors)
  • From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree with the tree
  • From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 24 (netdev/hp-plus build error)
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for February 25
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: cpufreq tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: cpufreq tree build failure
  • From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: cpufreq tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: cifs tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090220: XFS, IMA: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slub.c:1613
  • From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090220: XFS: inconsistent lock state
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 24 (ide-atapi/ide-cd build errors)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: cpufreq tree build failure
  • From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 24 (netdev/hp-plus build error)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: cifs tree build failure
  • From: Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for February 24
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: cifs tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: cpufreq tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of i2c tree with tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: acpi tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the x86 tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net-current build failure
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: net-current build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: no release today (20090223)
  • From: "Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• staging/wlan-ng: please revert commit 2ba4564cd from linux-next-20090220
  • From: Richard Kennedy <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090220: XFS, IMA: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slub.c:1613
  • From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: hid tree build warning
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree with the ftrace tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree with the ftrace tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090220: XFS, IMA: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slub.c:1613
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090220: XFS, IMA: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slub.c:1613
  • From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] eeepc: needs to depend on INPUT
  • From: Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090220: XFS, IMA: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slub.c:1613
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next-20090220: XFS: inconsistent lock state
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 20 (netdev: hp-plus)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] mimio: depends on INPUT
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] oqo: depends on INPUT_POLLDEV
  • From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 20
  • From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] oqo: depends on INPUT_POLLDEV
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] integrity: ima scatterlist bug fix
  • From: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: hid tree build warning
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree with the ftrace tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree with the ftrace tree
  • From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next-20090220: XFS, IMA: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slub.c:1613
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] integrity: ima scatterlist bug fix
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [s390] next Feb 18: defconfig build break
  • From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree with the ftrace tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree with the ftrace tree
  • From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree with the ftrace tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for February 20
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree with the ftrace tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree with the ftrace tree
  • From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: hid tree build warning
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree with the ftrace tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090219: IMA: kernel BUG at include/linux/scatterlist.h:65
  • From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] integrity: ima scatterlist bug fix
  • From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] eeepc: needs to depend on INPUT
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] eeepc: needs to depend on INPUT
  • From: Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] eeepc: needs to depend on INPUT
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [s390] next Feb 18: defconfig build break
  • From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@xxxxxxxxx>
• next-20090219: IMA: kernel BUG at include/linux/scatterlist.h:65
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for February 19
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [s390] next Feb 18: defconfig build break
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [s390] next Feb 18: defconfig build break
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] module: fix build for CONFIG_SYSFS=n
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [s390] next Feb 18: defconfig build break
  • From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] module: fix build for CONFIG_SYSFS=n
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the wireless tree with the wireless-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the wireless-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the wireless-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [s390] next Feb 18: defconfig build break
  • From: "Sachin P. Sant" <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: coming conflicts between wireless-2.6 and wireless-next-2.6
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [s390] next Feb 18: defconfig build break
  • From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [s390] next Feb 18: defconfig build break
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [s390] next Feb 18: defconfig build break
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [s390] next Feb 18: defconfig build break
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH v2] module: fix build for CONFIG_SYSFS=n
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 12 (ide)
  • From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH v2] module: fix build for CONFIG_SYSFS=n
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] module: fix build for CONFIG_SYSFS=n
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] module: fix build for CONFIG_SYSFS=n
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 12 (ide)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [s390] next Feb 18: defconfig build break
  • From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: USB mouse won't work after resume.
  • From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: USB mouse won't work after resume.
  • From: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [s390] next Feb 18: defconfig build break
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [s390] next Feb 18: defconfig build break
  • From: "Sachin P. Sant" <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090206: deadlock on ext4
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: USB mouse won't work after resume.
  • From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: USB mouse won't work after resume.
  • From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for February 18
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: pci tree build warning
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• coming conflicts between wireless-2.6 and wireless-next-2.6
  • From: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: USB mouse won't work after resume.
  • From: Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: USB mouse won't work after resume.
  • From: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: USB mouse won't work after resume.
  • From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ofa-general] linux-next: infiniband tree build warning
  • From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
• Next 17 : warn_on lib/debugobjects during mpt driver initialization.
  • From: "Sachin P. Sant" <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Next 17 : warn_slowpath() / powernowk8_cpu_init
  • From: "Sachin P. Sant" <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Next 17 : warn_slowpath() / powernowk8_cpu_init
  • From: "Sachin P. Sant" <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: USB mouse won't work after resume.
  • From: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 12 (ide)
  • From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: USB mouse won't work after resume.
  • From: Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090216: slqb
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: rr tree build error
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: rr tree build error
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the stackprotector tree with the x86 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090216: slqb
  • From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree with the hid tree
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the stackprotector tree with the x86 tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: USB mouse won't work after resume.
  • From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090216: slqb
  • From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: USB mouse won't work after resume.
  • From: Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for February 17
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree with the tip-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: infiniband tree build warning
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree with the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: rr tree build error
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree with the ftrace tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree with the hid tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree with the v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the stackprotector tree with the x86 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next-20090216: slqb
  • From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the ftrace tree with the x86 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] staging/phison: fix kconfig for clean build
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Patch - Next] [USB/FHCI] use dev_name() in place of bus_id.
  • From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [Patch - Next] [USB/FHCI] use dev_name() in place of bus_id.
  • From: "Sachin P. Sant" <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next Feb 16 build break [usb/host/fhci-*]
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: arm tree build failure
  • From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
• next Feb 16 build break [usb/host/fhci-*]
  • From: "Sachin P. Sant" <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for February 16
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree with the kernel-doc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kernel-doc tree with the ftrace tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree with the arm-current tree
  • From: Russell King <rmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree with the arm-current tree
  • From: Ryan Mallon <ryan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the arm tree with the arm-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH next] Staging: pohmelfs should depend on CRYPTO
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH next] Staging: pohmelfs should depend on CRYPTO
  • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH next] Staging: pohmelfs: fix printk format warnings v2
  • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: arm tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090206: deadlock on ext4
  • From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next Feb 13 drivers/scsi/aha1542.ko build break
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: next Feb 13 drivers/scsi/aha1542.ko build break
  • From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next Feb 13 drivers/scsi/aha1542.ko build break
  • From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] usb: fix ehci printk formats
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next Feb 13 drivers/scsi/aha1542.ko build break
  • From: Joe Eykholt <jeykholt@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next Feb 13 drivers/scsi/aha1542.ko build break
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: wireless tree build failure
  • From: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: wireless tree build failure
  • From: Dave <kilroyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next Feb 13 drivers/scsi/aha1542.ko build break
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] x86_32: fix printk formats
  • From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] x86_32: fix printk formats
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH next] Staging: pohmelfs: fix printk format warnings v2
  • From: Frank Seidel <frank@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH next] Staging: pohmelfs should depend on CRYPTO
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH next] Staging: pohmelfs: fix printk format warnings v2
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH next] Stagging: pohmelfs/net.c: include vmalloc.h
  • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH next 2/2] pohmelfs: fix printk format warnings
  • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH next 2/2] pohmelfs: fix printk format warnings
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH next] Stagging: pohmelfs/net.c: include vmalloc.h
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Patch] [S390] Fix appldata build break with !NET
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH next 2/2] pohmelfs: fix printk format warnings
  • From: Frank Seidel <fseidel@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH next 1/2] pohmelfs: fix build breakage
  • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH next 2/2] pohmelfs: fix printk format warnings
  • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH next 2/2] pohmelfs: fix printk format warnings
  • From: Frank Seidel <fseidel@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH next 2/2] pohmelfs: fix printk format warnings
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH next 1/2] pohmelfs: fix build breakage
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• [Patch] [S390] Fix appldata build break with !NET
  • From: "Sachin P. Sant" <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [S390] next Feb13 build break appldata/built-in.o
  • From: "Sachin P. Sant" <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ipw3945-devel] X200: Resume and iwlwifi on 2.6.29-rc4-ikn-00001-gd5b5623
  • From: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090209@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] x86_32: fix printk formats
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for February 13
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2.6.30] RDMA/cxgb3: remove modulo math from build_rdma_recv().
  • From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] ext4: Initialize list properly
  • From: Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] security/audit/ima: fix build error
  • From: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: wireless tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next test scripts
  • From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ipw3945-devel] X200: Resume and iwlwifi on 2.6.29-rc4-ikn-00001-gd5b5623
  • From: reinette chatre <reinette.chatre@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] x86_32: fix printk formats
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] security/audit/ima: fix build error
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] security/audit/ima: fix build error
  • From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] media/zoran: fix printk format
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] security/audit/ima: fix build error
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] wireless: fix for CONFIG_NL80211=n
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 12 (ide)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: wireless tree build failure
  • From: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next Feb 10: mm/slqb build break
  • From: "Sachin P. Sant" <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• next-20090212: drivers/watchdog/ks8695_wdt.c:68: error: 'CLOCK_TICK_RATE' undeclared (first use in this function)
  • From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for February 12
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: wireless tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] ext4: Initialize list properly
  • From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemcheck tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the net-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next Feb 10: mm/slqb build break
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next Feb 10: mm/slqb build break
  • From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2.6.30] RDMA/cxgb3: remove modulo math from build_rdma_recv().
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 2.6.30] RDMA/cxgb3: remove modulo math from build_rdma_recv().
  • From: Steve Wise <swise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2009-02-11
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] SGI IA64 UV: fix ia64 build error in the linux-next tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] SGI IA64 UV: fix ia64 build error in the linux-next tree
  • From: Dean Nelson <dcn@xxxxxxx>
• pull request: wireless-2.6 2009-02-11
  • From: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: [PATCH] SGI IA64 UV: fix ia64 build error in the linux-next tree
  • From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: [PATCH] SGI IA64 UV: fix ia64 build error in the linux-next tree
  • From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ofa-general] [PATCH 2.6.30] RDMA/cxgb3: Remove modulo math.
  • From: Steve Wise <swise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ofa-general] [PATCH 2.6.30] RDMA/cxgb3: Remove modulo math.
  • From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ofa-general] [PATCH 2.6.30] RDMA/cxgb3: Remove modulo math.
  • From: Steve Wise <swise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ofa-general] [PATCH 2.6.30] RDMA/cxgb3: Remove modulo math.
  • From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ofa-general] [PATCH 2.6.30] RDMA/cxgb3: Remove modulo math.
  • From: Steve Wise <swise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] SGI IA64 UV: fix ia64 build error in the linux-next tree
  • From: Dean Nelson <dcn@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] SGI IA64 UV: fix ia64 build error in the linux-next tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] SGI IA64 UV: fix ia64 build error in the linux-next tree
  • From: Dean Nelson <dcn@xxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090211: BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES too low!
  • From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090211: BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES too low!
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090211: BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES too low!
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090211: BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES too low!
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] SGI IA64 UV: fix ia64 build error in the linux-next tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090211: BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES too low!
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090211: BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES too low!
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090211: BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES too low!
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next-20090211: BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES too low!
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ofa-general] [PATCH 2.6.30] RDMA/cxgb3: Remove modulo math.
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ofa-general] [PATCH 2.6.30] RDMA/cxgb3: Remove modulo math.
  • From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for February 11
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 10 (security/audit/ima)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 10 (security/audit/ima)
  • From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ofa-general] [PATCH 2.6.30] RDMA/cxgb3: Remove modulo math.
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ofa-general] [PATCH 2.6.30] RDMA/cxgb3: Remove modulo math.
  • From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ofa-general] [PATCH 2.6.30] RDMA/cxgb3: Remove modulo math.
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ofa-general] [PATCH 2.6.30] RDMA/cxgb3: Remove modulo math.
  • From: Steve Wise <swise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ofa-general] [PATCH 2.6.30] RDMA/cxgb3: Remove modulo math.
  • From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 10 (security/audit/ima)
  • From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 10 (security/audit/ima)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] SGI IA64 UV: fix ia64 build error in the linux-next tree
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 10 (security/audit/ima)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2.6.30] RDMA/cxgb3: Remove modulo math.
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2.6.30] RDMA/cxgb3: Remove modulo math.
  • From: Steve Wise <swise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2.6.30] RDMA/cxgb3: Remove modulo math.
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 2.6.30] RDMA/cxgb3: Remove modulo math.
  • From: Steve Wise <swise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] oqo: depends on INPUT_POLLDEV
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] dell-laptop: depends on POWER_SUPPLY
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] rtl8187se: depends on WIRELESS_EXT
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• next-20090210: list_del corruption (ext4)
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the quota tree
  • From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Next Feb 10 build break on s390 : mm/shmem.c
  • From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] don't compile SGI XP/GRU on ia64_generic
  • From: Dean Nelson <dcn@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2/2] don't compile SGI XP/GRU on ia64_generic
  • From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2/2] don't compile SGI XP/GRU on ia64_generic
  • From: Robin Holt <holt@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] alpha: fix link error re stacktrace
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 2/2] don't compile SGI XP/GRU on ia64_generic
  • From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next Feb 10: mm/slqb build break
  • From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Patch] [s390] Fix init irq proc build break.
  • From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [Patch] [s390] Fix init irq proc build break.
  • From: "Sachin P. Sant" <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the quota tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Next Feb 10 build break on s390 : mm/shmem.c
  • From: "Sachin P. Sant" <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with the pxa tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Next Feb 10 : build/break arch/s390kernel.irq.o
  • From: "Sachin P. Sant" <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next Feb 10: mm/slqb build break
  • From: "Sachin P. Sant" <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the quota tree
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• next Feb 10: mm/slqb build break
  • From: "Sachin P. Sant" <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with the pxa tree
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for February 10
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] don't compile SGI XP/GRU on ia64_generic
  • From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the quota tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• X200: Resume and iwlwifi on 2.6.29-rc4-ikn-00001-gd5b5623
  • From: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090209@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with the pxa tree
  • From: Eric Miao <ymiao3@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with the pxa tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] alpha: fix link error re stacktrace
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] alpha: fix link error re stacktrace
  • From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 9 (ide-dma)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: quota tree build failure
  • From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] alpha: fix link error re stacktrace
  • From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 9 (ide-dma)
  • From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 9 (ide-dma)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 9 (infiniband)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 9 (infiniband)
  • From: Steve Wise <swise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 9 (infiniband)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] SGI IA64 UV: fix ia64 build error in the linux-next tree
  • From: Dean Nelson <dcn@xxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090206: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:1132
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090206: deadlock on ext4
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• X200: Suspend & resume, iwlwifi on 2.6.29-rc3-00697-gae1a25d
  • From: Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090209@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip-core tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for February 9
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Linus' tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip-core tree with the x86 tree
  • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree with the x86 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree with the x86 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip-core tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip-core tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip-core tree with the x86 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: acpi tree build failure
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: acpi tree build failure
  • From: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pci tree with the pci-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pci tree with the pci-current tree
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090206: deadlock on ext4
  • From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
  • From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090206: deadlock on ext4
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090206: deadlock on ext4
  • From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
• next-20090206: deadlock on ext4
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090206: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:1132
  • From: Yan Zheng <yanzheng@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
  • From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pci tree with the pci-current tree
  • From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
  • From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
  • From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090202: task kmemleak:763 blocked for more than 120seconds.
  • From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
  • From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
  • From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
  • From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090206: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:1132
  • From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
  • From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
  • From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxx>
• next-20090206: kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:1132
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next test scripts
  • From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip-core tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for February 6
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH/RFC] m68k: atari - Rename "mfp" to "st_mfp"
  • From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
  • From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: slab tree build warning
  • From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
  • From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@xxxxxxxxx>
• [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
  • From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: security-testing tree build failure
  • From: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security-testing tree with Linus' tree
  • From: James Morris <jmorris@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: security-testing tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the security-testing tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: ide tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: quota tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the pci tree with the pci-current tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip-core tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: cpufreq tree build failure
  • From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH/RFC] m68k: atari - Rename "mfp" to "st_mfp"
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: cpufreq tree build failure
  • From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: cpufreq tree build failure
  • From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 5 (fatal: in modpost)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• X200: not resuming, cryptswap fails (was: linux-next: Tree for February 5)
  • From: Nico -telmich- Schottelius <nico-linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [tip:core/printk] printk: introduce printk_once()
  • From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/2] CPUFREQ: powernow-k8: Forgot to use printk instead of WARN_ONCE in last patch
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• [tip:core/printk] printk: introduce printk_once()
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the tree
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/2] CPUFREQ: powernow-k8: Forgot to use printk instead of WARN_ONCE in last patch
  • From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/2] CPUFREQ: powernow-k8: Forgot to use printk instead of WARN_ONCE in last patch
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/2] CPUFREQ: powernow-k8: Forgot to use printk instead of WARN_ONCE in last patch
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/2] CPUFREQ: powernow-k8: Forgot to use printk instead of WARN_ONCE in last patch
  • From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/2] CPUFREQ: powernow-k8: Forgot to use printk instead of WARN_ONCE in last patch
  • From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/2] CPUFREQ: powernow-k8: Forgot to use printk instead of WARN_ONCE in last patch
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: quota tree build warning
  • From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
• On top fixes for my last patches
  • From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 2/2] CPUFREQ: Use static or it won't compile if conservative and ondemand are set =y
  • From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/2] CPUFREQ: powernow-k8: Forgot to use printk instead of WARN_ONCE in last patch
  • From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: cpufreq tree build failure
  • From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: cpufreq tree build failure
  • From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for February 5
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: cpufreq tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: quota tree build warning
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: acpi tree build failure
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree with the cpufreq tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: md/md-current tree fetch failure
  • From: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 3 (can't boot)
  • From: Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: acpi tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: md/md-current tree fetch failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 4 (sound/isa/msnd)
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 4 (sound/isa/msnd)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 23 (kvm)
  • From: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: drm tree build failure
  • From: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for February 4
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: slab tree build warning
  • From: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: slab tree build warning
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: drm tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090202: task kmemleak:763 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
  • From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
• next-20090202 build failure : drivers/leds/leds-gpio.o
  • From: "Sachin P. Sant" <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: sound tree build failure
  • From: Timur Tabi <timur@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090202: task kmemleak:763 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
  • From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090202: task kmemleak:763 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
  • From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090202: task kmemleak:763 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with Linus' tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for February 3
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: sound tree build failure
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: sound tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090202: task kmemleak:763 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
  • From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: ide quilt series import failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: s390 tree fetch failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: s390 tree fetch failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090202: task kmemleak:763 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
  • From: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for February 2 (iwlwifi)
  • From: reinette chatre <reinette.chatre@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure
  • From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] jfs: needs crc32_le
  • From: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] jfs: needs crc32_le
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: ide quilt series import failure
  • From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
• next-20090202 build failure : arch/x86/kvm/kvm.ko
  • From: "Sachin P. Sant" <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090202: task kmemleak:763 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
  • From: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090202: task kmemleak:763 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
  • From: Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20090202: task kmemleak:763 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
  • From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
• next-20090202: task kmemleak:763 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
  • From: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for February 2
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree with the slab tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: sparseirq tree build warning
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemcheck tree with the tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the parisc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the firmware tree with the sound tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the parisc tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree with the cpufreq tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: acpi tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip-core tree with Linus' tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the parisc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: ide quilt series import failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: kernel-doc quilte serie import failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: new xfs git tree
  • From: Felix Blyakher <felixb@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 23 (kvm)
  • From: Alexander Graf <agraf@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 23 (kvm)
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: X200 suspend issue / linux-next: Tree for January 21
  • From: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: X200 suspend issue / linux-next: Tree for January 21
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ide tree with the driver-core tree
  • From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: X200 suspend issue / linux-next: Tree for January 21
  • From: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx>
• Re: new xfs git tree
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] net: pppoe - stop using proc internals
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] pppol2tp: stop using proc internals
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] sysrq: include interrupt.h instead of irq.h
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] sysrq: include interrupt.h instead of irq.h
  • From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] sysrq: include interrupt.h instead of irq.h
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree with the ftace tree
  • From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 26
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree with the ftace tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ide tree with the driver-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ide tree with the driver-core tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the ide tree with the driver-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] net: pppoe - stop using proc internals
  • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] pppol2tp: stop using proc internals
  • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] pppol2tp: stop using proc internals
  • From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [patch -next] 9pnet_rdma build error
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 23 (drivers/watchdog/cpwd.c:411: error: 'inode' undeclared (first use in this function))
  • From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] kmemtrace: fix printk format warnings
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 23 (kvm)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: proc tree build failure
  • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: proc tree build failure
  • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: proc tree build failure
  • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: proc tree build failure
  • From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kmemcheck tree with the x86 tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kmemcheck tree with the x86 tree
  • From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with the pxa tree
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Rebooting at boot: linux-next: Tree for January 22
  • From: Nico -telmich- Schottelius <nico-linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 23
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: proc tree build failure
  • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: proc tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree with the kmemcheck tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the sparseirq tree with the cpus4096 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemcheck tree with the x86 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with the pxa tree
  • From: Ian Molton <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree with the pxa tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the tip-core tree with the x86 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 22 (staging/android)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 22 (staging/android)
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: ide tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 22 (staging/rtl8187se)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 22 (staging/rtl8187se)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 22 (staging/android)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 22 (staging/altpcichdma)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 22 (staging/rtl8187se)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core.current tree build failure
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: ide tree build failure
  • From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 22
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: v4l-dvb tree build warning
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: driver-core.current tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: quota tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: ide tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the i2c tree with the pxa tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] regulator: Hoist struct regulator_dev out of core to fix notifiers
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] sysrq: include interrupt.h instead of irq.h
  • From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] regulator: Hoist struct regulator_dev out of core to fix notifiers
  • From: Liam Girdwood <lrg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: X200 suspend issue / linux-next: Tree for January 21
  • From: Nico -telmich- Schottelius <nico-linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: voltage tree build failure
  • From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] regulator: Hoist struct regulator_dev out of core to fix notifiers
  • From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] regulator: Hoist struct regulator_dev out of core to fix notifiers
  • From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] sysrq: include interrupt.h instead of irq.h
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 21
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: voltage tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with Linus' treee
  • From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cpufreq tree with the cpus4096 tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with Linus' treee
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 20
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: cpufreq tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree with the ftrace tree
  • From: Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree with the ftrace and slab trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: crypto tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: cpufreq tree build failure
  • From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cpufreq tree with the cpus4096 tree
  • From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: crypto tree build failure
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the proc tree with the security-testing tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: crypto tree build failure
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the slab tree with the ftrace tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: crypto tree build failure
  • From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: cpufreq tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the cpufreq tree with the cpus4096 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: crypto tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 2.6.30 material is OK now?
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with Linus' treee
  • From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with Linus' treee
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• 2.6.30 material is OK now?
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: unable to fetch device-mapper quilt series
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 19 (DST)
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 19 (DST)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 19 (DST)
  • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 19 (x86_32 sub-arch)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 19 (DST)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: unable to fetch nfs or nfsd trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: unable to fetch nfs or nfsd trees
  • From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: hid tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: hid tree build failure
  • From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 19
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: quota tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: hid tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the cpus4096 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the stackprotector tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: FS-Cache fixes for IA64 export and AFS linkage
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: FS-Cache fixes for IA64 export and AFS linkage
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• FS-Cache fixes for IA64 export and AFS linkage
  • From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build problem with nfs tree (Was: Re: [mmotm][PATCH] fix ia64 build error)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build problem with nfs tree (Was: Re: [mmotm][PATCH] fix ia64 build error)
  • From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cris tree
  • From: Jesper Nilsson <Jesper.Nilsson@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build problem with nfs tree (Was: Re: [mmotm][PATCH] fix ia64 build error)
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build problem with nfs tree (Was: Re: [mmotm][PATCH] fix ia64 build error)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build problem with nfs tree (Was: Re: [mmotm][PATCH] fix ia64 build error)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build problem with nfs tree (Was: Re: [mmotm][PATCH] fix ia64 build error)
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: tree build failure
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: tree build failure
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: tree build failure
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: tree build failure
  • From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 16
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build problem with nfs tree (Was: Re: [mmotm][PATCH] fix ia64 build error)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build problem with nfs tree (Was: Re: [mmotm][PATCH] fix ia64 build error)
  • From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cris tree
  • From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build problem with nfs tree (Was: Re: [mmotm][PATCH] fix ia64 build error)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the ocfs2 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build problem with nfs tree (Was: Re: [mmotm][PATCH] fix ia64 build error)
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 15 (afs/fscache)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build problem with nfs tree (Was: Re: [mmotm][PATCH] fix ia64 build error)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the cris tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 15 (afs/fscache)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree
  • From: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD_FAILURE] next-20090115 - s390x - mm/kmemleak.c
  • From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD_FAILURE] next-20090115 - s390x - mm/kmemleak.c
  • From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD_FAILURE] next-20090115 - s390x - mm/kmemleak.c
  • From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD_FAILURE] next-20090115 - s390x - mm/kmemleak.c
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD_FAILURE] next-20090115 - s390x - mm/kmemleak.c
  • From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD_FAILURE] next-20090115 - s390x - mm/kmemleak.c
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree
  • From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD_FAILURE] next-20090115 - s390x - mm/kmemleak.c
  • From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD_FAILURE] next-20090115 - s390x - mm/kmemleak.c
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• [BUILD_FAILURE] next-20090115 - s390x - mm/kmemleak.c
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree
  • From: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 15
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemleak tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: unable to fetch nfs or nfsd trees
  • From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: unable to fetch nfs or nfsd trees
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: quota tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 14 (multimedia/firesat-rc)
  • From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 14 (multimedia/firesat-rc)
  • From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 14 (multimedia/firesat-rc)
  • From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20090114 - drivers/staging/meilhaus
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20090114 - drivers/staging/meilhaus
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20090114 - drivers/staging/meilhaus
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
• [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20090114 - drivers/staging/meilhaus
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20090114 - powerpc - drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 14 (multimedia/firesat-rc)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: quota tree build failure
  • From: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: mfd tree build failure
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 14
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: quota tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20090113 - drivers/scsi/aha1542.c builds with CONFIG_PPC=y
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20090113 - powerpc - kernel/idle.c fails at cpu_idle()
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 13 (gfs2 build error)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] next-20090113 - scsi_debug fails with CONFIG_CRC_T10DIF=n
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20090113 - drivers/scsi/aha1542.c builds with CONFIG_PPC=y
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] next-20090113 - scsi_debug fails with CONFIG_CRC_T10DIF=n
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20090113 - drivers/scsi/aha1542.c builds with CONFIG_PPC=y
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20090113 - powerpc - kernel/idle.c fails at cpu_idle()
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>