Re: linux-next: cpufreq tree build failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Dave,

On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:45:04 -0500 Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> There were a bunch of 64bit Xeons made that lacked P-states.
> Though using p4-clockmod as a replacement isn't a good idea, but we should
> still allow it for thermal protection.
> Also some of the Atoms are 64bit capable, but also lack P-states.
> 
> I'll nix the ifdefs and regenerate the tree.

OK, thanks.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgprsqC7Vi2o1.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux