On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 11:38 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the tip-core tree got a conflict in > fs/btrfs/locking.c between commit > b4ce94de9b4d64e8ab3cf155d13653c666e22b9b ("Btrfs: Change btree locking to > use explicit blocking points") from Linus' tree and commit > cf47b8f3d96b0b8b10b557444a28b3ca4024ff82 ("Btrfs: stop spinning on > mutex_trylock and let the adaptive code spin for us") from the tip-core > tree. > > Resolved as in tip/master by taking the version from Linus' tree. Sorry, I meant to ask Ingo to drop the patch I had sent along for the btrfs adaptive code. Using Linus' copy was the right answer, it replaces the patch I sent to Ingo. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html