Hi Randy, On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:55:12 -0800 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > Dropped trees (temporarily): > > audit (difficult conflicts) > > Maybe this is fixed by the dropped audit tree? The audit tree is Al Viro's (cc'd). But I *think* everything in it has been applied upstream. > linux-next-20090210/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:111: error: implicit declaration of function 'security_audit_rule_match' > linux-next-20090210/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:230: error: implicit declaration of function 'security_audit_rule_init' > > when > CONFIG_SECURITY=y > CONFIG_AUDIT=n > CONFIG_IMA=y > CONFIG_IMA_AUDIT=y This looks more like a security subsystem than audit to me? -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgp3m8BZqJlG0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
