On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 15:52 +0300, Alexander Beregalov wrote: > 2009/2/11 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 13:24 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >> On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 13:23 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >> > On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 15:14 +0300, Alexander Beregalov wrote: > >> > > Hi > >> > > > >> > > Full dmesg is attached. > >> > > > >> > > Lock dependency validator: Copyright (c) 2006 Red Hat, Inc., Ingo Molnar > >> > > .... MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES: 8 > >> > > .... MAX_LOCK_DEPTH: 48 > >> > > .... MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS: 8191 > >> > > .... CLASSHASH_SIZE: 4096 > >> > > .... MAX_LOCKDEP_ENTRIES: 8192 > >> > > .... MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS: 16384 > >> > > .... CHAINHASH_SIZE: 8192 > >> > > memory used by lock dependency info: 4351 kB > >> > > per task-struct memory footprint: 2688 bytes > >> > > <..> > >> > > BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES too low! > >> > > turning off the locking correctness validator. > >> > > >> > Is this an allyesconfig or something other massive bloated? > >> > >> Sorry, not playing attention, its SUB classes.. let me look at that, > >> that smells like a rotten annotation. > > > > Could you run with the below patch, so that we can see where this > > happens? Tssk, Chris what you have been doing? > BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES too low! > turning off the locking correctness validator. > Pid: 2105, comm: btrfs-endio-wri Not tainted 2.6.29-rc4-next-20090211-dirty #2 > Call Trace: > [<ffffffff8026cbf9>] __lock_acquire+0x6b9/0x12c0 > [<ffffffff8026d891>] lock_acquire+0x91/0xc0 > [<ffffffff80447324>] ? btrfs_tree_lock+0xc4/0x160 > [<ffffffff8062eb36>] _spin_lock_nested+0x46/0x80 > [<ffffffff80447324>] ? btrfs_tree_lock+0xc4/0x160 > [<ffffffff80447324>] btrfs_tree_lock+0xc4/0x160 > [<ffffffff804471a0>] ? btrfs_wake_function+0x0/0x10 > [<ffffffff8040bce6>] btrfs_init_new_buffer+0xa6/0x150 > [<ffffffff80412fa1>] btrfs_alloc_free_block+0x81/0x90 > [<ffffffff80402a16>] __btrfs_cow_block+0x7a6/0xb70 > [<ffffffff804034e2>] btrfs_cow_block+0x112/0x2d0 > [<ffffffff804072f3>] btrfs_search_slot+0x223/0xb00 > [<ffffffff80235a99>] ? sub_preempt_count+0xa9/0xf0 > [<ffffffff804178d1>] btrfs_lookup_csum+0x61/0x150 > [<ffffffff8026c2ed>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 > [<ffffffff80418356>] btrfs_csum_file_blocks+0xc6/0x7d0 > [<ffffffff802c2315>] ? kmem_cache_free+0xb5/0x110 > [<ffffffff802c2315>] ? kmem_cache_free+0xb5/0x110 > [<ffffffff8026c2ed>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 > [<ffffffff80437c76>] ? free_extent_state+0x46/0x70 > [<ffffffff80439462>] ? clear_extent_bit+0xe2/0x2e0 > [<ffffffff8042166a>] add_pending_csums+0x4a/0x70 > [<ffffffff80422ac5>] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x115/0x1e0 > [<ffffffff80422ba0>] btrfs_writepage_end_io_hook+0x10/0x20 > [<ffffffff8043abf4>] end_bio_extent_writepage+0x104/0x1e0 > [<ffffffff8026c282>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x182/0x1e0 > [<ffffffff802ef0cc>] bio_endio+0x1c/0x40 > [<ffffffff8041b02b>] end_workqueue_fn+0xeb/0x120 > [<ffffffff804446ea>] worker_loop+0x7a/0x1b0 > [<ffffffff80444670>] ? worker_loop+0x0/0x1b0 > [<ffffffff80259126>] kthread+0x56/0x90 > [<ffffffff8020cc5a>] child_rip+0xa/0x20 > [<ffffffff80235969>] ? finish_task_switch+0x89/0x110 > [<ffffffff8062f546>] ? _spin_unlock_irq+0x36/0x60 > [<ffffffff8020c640>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30 > [<ffffffff802590d0>] ? kthread+0x0/0x90 > [<ffffffff8020cc50>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
