Linux Next

• Thread Index

• [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20090113 - drivers/scsi/aha1542.c builds with CONFIG_PPC=y
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20090113 - powerpc - kernel/idle.c fails at cpu_idle()
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 13
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: mfd tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] scsi_debug: needs CRC_T10DIF
  • From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: [PATCH -next] libfc: needs CRC32
  • From: "Love, Robert W" <robert.w.love@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix cpufreq drivers after cpufreq core changes
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: "Steve French" <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: "Steve French" <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: "Steve French" <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: "Steve French" <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: "Steve French" <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (afs/fscache)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: "Steve French" <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] scsi_debug: needs CRC_T10DIF
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] libfc: needs CRC32
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 12 (cifs vs. staging)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix cpufreq drivers after cpufreq core changes
  • From: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: drm tree build failure
  • From: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: mfd tree build failure
  • From: Balaji Rao <balajirrao@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Michael Ellerman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix cpufreq drivers after cpufreq core changes
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 12
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: drm tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: mfd tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] powerpc: Fix cpufreq drivers after cpufreq core changes
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] jbd2: fix printk format warning
  • From: Simon Holm Thøgersen <odie@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] jbd2: fix printk format warning
  • From: Simon Holm Thøgersen <odie@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] jbd2: fix printk format warning
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 8 (percpu)
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] cacheinfo: rename cache_dir per-cpu variable
  • From: Nathan Lynch <ntl@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (MTD)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 9
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: ocfs2 tree build failure
  • From: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@xxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: import of rr tree failed
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 8 (percpu)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 8 (multimedia/cx88)
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 4/4] i2400m/usb: wrap USB power saving in #ifdef CONFIG_PM
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 3/4] wimax: testing for rfkill support should also test for CONFIG_RFKILL_MODULE
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 2/4] wimax: fix kconfig interactions with rfkill and input layers
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/4] wimax: fix '#ifndef CONFIG_BUG' layout to avoid warning
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 8 (multimedia/cx88)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 8 (percpu)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the nommu tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the nommu tree
  • From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 7 (wimax: more)
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the nommu tree
  • From: Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: rr tree build warnings
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 3/3] wimax: testing for rfkill support should also test for CONFIG_RFKILL_MODULE
  • From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 8
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/3] wimax: fix '#ifndef CONFIG_BUG' layout to avoid warning
  • From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 2/3] wimax: fix kconfig interactions with rfkill and input layers
  • From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 0/3] wimax: Kbuild / rfkill-build fixes (v2)
  • From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: build failure
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: rr tree build warning
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the nommu tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: ocfs2 tree build failure
  • From: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: ocfs2 tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 0/4] wimax: Kbuild / rfkill-build / PM fixes (v3)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5 (multimedia #3)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5 (multimedia #3)
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: Michael Marineau <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: ftrace tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 1/4] firmware: convert e100 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Suspend issues on all latest kernels!
  • From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxx>
• Suspend issues on all latest kernels!
  • From: Nico -telmich- Schottelius <nico-linux-20090106@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 4/4] i2400m/usb: wrap USB power saving in #ifdef CONFIG_PM
  • From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 3/4] wimax: testing for rfkill support should also test for CONFIG_RFKILL_MODULE
  • From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 2/4] wimax: fix kconfig interactions with rfkill and input layers
  • From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/4] wimax: fix '#ifndef CONFIG_BUG' layout to avoid warning
  • From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 0/4] wimax: Kbuild / rfkill-build / PM fixes (v3)
  • From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 7 (wimax: more)
  • From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 1/4] firmware: convert e100 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: "Jeff Kirsher" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5 (multimedia #3)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 1/4] firmware: convert e100 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: "Jeff Kirsher" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 7 (ath9k)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 7 (wimax: more)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: strncat() misuse (was: Re: dm_attr_{name,uuid}_show buffer overflow? (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5))
  • From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: ftrace tree build failure
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (wimax errs)
  • From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 7
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: Michael Marineau <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: rr tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (staging/android #2)
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: ftrace tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (staging/android #2)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (staging/android)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (staging/altpciehdma)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (staging/comedi)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5 (multimedia #3)
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (wimax errs)
  • From: Iñaky Pérez-González <inaky.perez-gonzalez@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (wimax errs)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (MTD)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (MTD)
  • From: Alexey Korolev <akorolev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 6 (MTD)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5 (multimedia #2)
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5 (multimedia build errors)
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 6
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: firmware tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the mfd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: rr tree build warnings
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: rr tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: strncat() misuse (was: Re: dm_attr_{name,uuid}_show buffer overflow? (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5))
  • From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: strncat() misuse (was: Re: dm_attr_{name,uuid}_show buffer overflow? (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5))
  • From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the pci tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• strncat() misuse (was: Re: dm_attr_{name,uuid}_show buffer overflow? (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5))
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• dm_attr_{name,uuid}_show buffer overflow? (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5)
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] jbd2: fix printk format warning
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5 (multimedia #3)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5 (multimedia #2)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5 (multimedia build errors)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 5 (dm-target)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: "Jaswinder Singh Rajput" <jaswinderlinux@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: "Jaswinder Singh Rajput" <jaswinderlinux@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: "Jaswinder Singh Rajput" <jaswinderlinux@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for Squashfs
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for Squashfs
  • From: Phillip Lougher <phillip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for Squashfs
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Pull request for Squashfs
  • From: Phillip Lougher <phillip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 5
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 1/4] firmware: convert e100 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the ext4 tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 1/4] firmware: convert e100 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: "Jeff Kirsher" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 4/4] starfire: use request_firmware()
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 2/4] firmware: convert acenic driver to request_firmware() -- without firmware data
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 1/4] firmware: convert e100 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: kvm tree build failure
  • From: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: kvm tree build failure
  • From: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH V2 00/16] Squashfs: compressed read-only filesystem
  • From: "Leon Woestenberg" <leon.woestenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: kvm tree build failure
  • From: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH V2 00/16] Squashfs: compressed read-only filesystem
  • From: Phillip Lougher <phillip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security-testing tree
  • From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next] 9p: fix RDMA dependency
  • From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] sunrpc: fix RDMA dependency
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] 9p: fix RDMA dependency
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 2
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
  • From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for January 2
  • From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree
  • From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: ftrace tree build failure
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: ftrace tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081231 - S390x kernel panics while bootup at init_sched_build_groups()
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20081230 - S390 - tape drive fails to build with !CONFIG_BLOCK
  • From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for January 2
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: ftrace tree build failure
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: ftrace tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mtd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: kvm tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: "Kyle Moffett" <kyle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 30
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: "Muntz, Daniel" <Dan.Muntz@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [BUG] next-20081231 -powerpc - panic at tasklet_kill_immediate()
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [BUG] next-20081231 - S390x kernel panics while bootup at init_sched_build_groups()
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for December 31
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20081230 - S390 - tape drive fails to build with !CONFIG_BLOCK
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 30
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: timers tree build failure
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: timers tree build failure
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch] powerpc: change u64/s64 to a long long integer type
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch] powerpc: change u64/s64 to a long long integer type
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the security-testing tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree
  • From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sched tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ofa-general] Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: "Muntz, Daniel" <Dan.Muntz@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ofa-general] Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ofa-general] Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -net-next 1/4] firmware: convert e100 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: "Jeff Kirsher" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: "Muntz, Daniel" <Dan.Muntz@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe/libfc)
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe/libfc)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe/libfc)
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe/libfc)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] clean up of netif_rx_reschedule() changes in drivers
  • From: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/1] cxgb3i - remove use of skb->sp
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for December 30
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: scsi tree build failure
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next v2] cxgb3i: use same dependencies & selects as CHELSIO_T3
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: scsi tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [BUILD-FAILURE] fcoe driver build fails with !CONFIG_PCI
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ofa-general] Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe/libfc)
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ofa-general] Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemcheck tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kmemcheck tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 00/14] Kernel memory leak detector
  • From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -net-next 2/4] firmware: convert acenic driver to request_firmware() -- without firmware data
  • From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -net-next 4/4] starfire: use request_firmware()
  • From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -net-next 3/4] firmware: convert tg3 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -net-next 1/4] firmware: convert e100 driver to request_firmware()
  • From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -net-next 0/4] firmware patches for net drivers
  • From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (cxgb3i)
  • From: Karen Xie <kxie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/1] cxgb3i - remove use of skb->sp
  • From: Karen Xie <kxie@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe/libfc)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] clean up of netif_rx_reschedule() changes in drivers
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 00/14] Kernel memory leak detector
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: rr_cpumask tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: "Muntz, Daniel" <Dan.Muntz@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: rr_cpumask tree build failure
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (cxgb3i)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next v2] cxgb3i: use same dependencies & selects as CHELSIO_T3
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH -next v2] cxgb3i: use same dependencies & selects as CHELSIO_T3
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (cxgb3i)
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ofa-general] Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe)
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe)
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next v2] cxgb3i: use same dependencies & selects as CHELSIO_T3
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the boot-params tree
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: rr tree build failure
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] cxgb3i: use same dependencies as CHELSIO_T3
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (cxgb3i)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (fcoe)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Aleksey Senin <alekseys@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: rr_cpumask tree build failure
  • From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for December 29
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: rr_cpumask tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] clean up of netif_rx_reschedule() changes in drivers
  • From: Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: rr tree build failure
  • From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the boot-params tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the boot-params tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the boot-params tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the uwb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the uwb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the iommu tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] clean up of netif_rx_reschedule() changes in drivers
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] clean up of netif_rx_reschedule() changes in drivers
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: timers tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Aleksey Senin <alekseys@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: timers tree build failure
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: "Aleksey Senin" <alekseys@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: xfs tree build warnings
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [xfs-masters] linux-next: xfs tree build warnings
  • From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
• linux-next: xfs tree build warnings
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: rr tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: kvm tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build warnings
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build warnings
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the creds tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build warnings
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: timers tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the timers tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: origin tree build warnings
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: origin tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] kbuild, sparseirq: work around GCC bug with __weak aliases
  • From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: rr tree import failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: 2.6.30 inclusions
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: "Yinghai Lu" <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] kbuild, sparseirq: work around GCC bug with __weak aliases
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] kgdb: more barrier in blank weak function
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] kgdb: more barrier in blank weak function
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] perf_counter: more barrier in blank weak function
  • From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] kgdb: more barrier in blank weak function
  • From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] perf_counter: more barrier in blank weak function
  • From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] kbuild, sparseirq: work around GCC bug with __weak aliases
  • From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] kbuild, sparseirq: work around GCC bug with __weak aliases
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree
  • From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
  • From: Ken Chen <kenchen@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
  • From: Ken Chen <kenchen@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] sparc64: fix unsigned long long warnings in drivers
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] sparc64: use unsigned long long for u64
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: no linux-next release for Dec 23
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mtd tree
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: testing (Was: Re: linux-next: scsi-post-merge tree build failure)
  • From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
  • From: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: testing (Was: Re: linux-next: scsi-post-merge tree build failure)
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
  • From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch] powerpc: change u64/s64 to a long long integer type
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch] powerpc: change u64/s64 to a long long integer type
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• testing (Was: Re: linux-next: scsi-post-merge tree build failure)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch] powerpc: change u64/s64 to a long long integer type
  • From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch] powerpc: change u64/s64 to a long long integer type
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (patch: kernel-doc notation)
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
  • From: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [patch] powerpc: change u64/s64 to a long long integer type
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
  • From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
  • From: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
  • From: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: scsi-post-merge tree build failure
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Firmware patches for SCSI
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Firmware patches for SCSI
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: scsi-post-merge tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: no linux-next for Dec 22
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: scsi-post-merge tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: kvm tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: driver-core tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: sched tree build warning
  • From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: sched tree build warning
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: sched tree build warning
  • From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: sched tree build warning
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: sched tree build warning
  • From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
• [patch] powerpc: change u64/s64 to a long long integer type
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Firmware patches for SCSI
  • From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] m68k: Kill several external declarations in source files (was: Re: linux-next: boot-params tree build failure)
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: sched tree build warning
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: sched tree build warning
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: sched tree build warning
  • From: Ken Chen <kenchen@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: sched tree build warning
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sched tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Firmware patches for SCSI
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the mtd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
  • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: sched tree build warning
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: scsi tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: scsi tree build failure
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sched tree
  • From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the sched tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: usb tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] m68k: Kill several external declarations in source files (was: Re: linux-next: boot-params tree build failure)
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] m68k: Kill several external declarations in source files (was: Re: linux-next: boot-params tree build failure)
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: scsi tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] advansys: use request_firmware
  • From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 17 (Radeon DRM BUG)
  • From: Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 17 (Radeon DRM BUG)
  • From: Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] sparseirq: fix numa_migrate_irq_desc dependency and comments
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] sparseirq: fix numa_migrate_irq_desc dependency and comments
  • From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 19 (new CONFIG_NUMA_MIGRATE_IRQ_DESC option)
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 19 (new CONFIG_NUMA_MIGRATE_IRQ_DESC option)
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 19 (new CONFIG_NUMA_MIGRATE_IRQ_DESC option)
  • From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 19 (new CONFIG_NUMA_MIGRATE_IRQ_DESC option)
  • From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Firmware patches for SCSI
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Firmware patches for SCSI
  • From: "Jaswinder Singh" <jaswinderlinux@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Firmware patches for SCSI
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Firmware patches for Network
  • From: "Jaswinder Singh" <jaswinderlinux@xxxxxxxxx>
• Firmware patches for DVB
  • From: "Jaswinder Singh" <jaswinderlinux@xxxxxxxxx>
• Firmware patches for SCSI
  • From: "Jaswinder Singh" <jaswinderlinux@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 17 (Radeon DRM BUG)
  • From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for December 19
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: "Yinghai Lu" <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [BUG] next-20081216 - WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:333 smp_call_function_mask
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (patch: kernel-doc notation)
  • From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (irq.h documentation)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (irq.h documentation)
  • From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (irq.h documentation)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (irq.h documentation)
  • From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: perfmon3 tree removed
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (patch: kernel-doc notation)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (irq.h documentation)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 17 (Radeon DRM BUG)
  • From: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 17 (Radeon DRM BUG)
  • From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 17 (Radeon DRM BUG)
  • From: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 17 (Radeon DRM BUG)
  • From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (fscache)
  • From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (slow-work)
  • From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (fscache)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 18 (slow-work)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 17 (DVB)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20081217-s390x-'struct device' has no member named 'knode_parent'
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [mmotm and linux-next][PATCH] irq: enclose irq_desc_lock_class in CONFIG_LOCKDEP
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for December 18
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH] KVM: Remove old kvm_guest_debug structs (was: linux-next: kvm tree build failure)
  • From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] KVM: Remove old kvm_guest_debug structs
  • From: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 15 (mfd)
  • From: David Brownell <david-b@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: kvm tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 15 (mfd)
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: rr series import failure
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20081217-s390x-'struct device' has no member named 'knode_parent'
  • From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 15 (mfd)
  • From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the boot-params tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 17 (Radeon DRM BUG)
  • From: "Dave Airlie" <airlied@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): x86
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: rr series import failure
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: rr series import failure
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: rr series import failure
  • From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 17 (Radeon DRM BUG)
  • From: Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 17 (DVB)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: rr series import failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): x86
  • From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): x86
  • From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 15 (mfd)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [BUILD-FAILURE] next-20081217-s390x-'struct device' has no member named 'knode_parent'
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/1] cpumask: add alloc_cpumask_var_node V2
  • From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
• next-20081217: general protection fault: tty
  • From: "Alexander Beregalov" <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for December 17
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: scsi tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: cpu_alloc tree
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/1] cpumask: add alloc_cpumask_var_node V2
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] linux-next: 20081209 - kernel bug at __rcu_process_callbacks, while booting up
  • From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] linux-next: 20081209 - kernel bug at __rcu_process_callbacks, while booting up
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [mmotm and linux-next][PATCH] irq: enclose irq_desc_lock_class in CONFIG_LOCKDEP
  • From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: mtd tree build failures (Was: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 16)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: mtd tree build failures (Was: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 16)
  • From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: boot-params tree build failure
  • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build warnings
  • From: "Eilon Greenstein" <eilong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: net tree build warnings
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: sound tree build failure
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20081216 - powerpc link error 'dynreloc miscount'
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• next-20081216 - powerpc link error 'dynreloc miscount'
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20081216 - powerpc link error 'dynreloc miscount'
  • From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: net tree build warnings
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 16
  • From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: boot-params tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: mtd tree build failures (Was: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 16)
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: boot-params tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: boot-params tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: lblnet tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 16
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 11
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 11
  • From: "Alexey Zaytsev" <alexey.zaytsev@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH] sgi-xp: xpc needs to pass the physical address, not virtual
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 11
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: sound tree build failure
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: scsi tree build warnings
  • From: James Smart <James.Smart@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: lblnet tree build failure
  • From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@xxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
  • From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: cpu_alloc tree
  • From: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] linux-next: 20081209 - kernel bug at __rcu_process_callbacks, while booting up
  • From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [BUG] linux-next: 20081209 - kernel bug at __rcu_process_callbacks, while booting up
  • From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [mmotm and linux-next][PATCH] irq: enclose irq_desc_lock_class in CONFIG_LOCKDEP
  • From: "KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [mmotm and linux-next][PATCH] irq: enclose irq_desc_lock_class in CONFIG_LOCKDEP
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [mmotm and linux-next][PATCH] irq: enclose irq_desc_lock_class in CONFIG_LOCKDEP
  • From: "KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for December 16
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [mmotm and linux-next][PATCH] irq: enclose irq_desc_lock_class in CONFIG_LOCKDEP
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [mmotm and linux-next][PATCH] irq: enclose irq_desc_lock_class in CONFIG_LOCKDEP
  • From: "KOSAKI Motohiro" <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [mmotm and linux-next][PATCH] irq: enclose irq_desc_lock_class in CONFIG_LOCKDEP
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [mmotm and linux-next][PATCH] irq: enclose irq_desc_lock_class in CONFIG_LOCKDEP
  • From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH] simnet: convert to net_device_ops
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [mmotm and linux-next][PATCH] irq: enclose irq_desc_lock_class in CONFIG_LOCKDEP
  • From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: lblnet tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [mmotm and linux-next][PATCH] irq: enclose irq_desc_lock_class in CONFIG_LOCKDEP
  • From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: cpu_alloc tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
  • From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: v4l-dvb tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: semaphore-removal tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/1] cpumask: add alloc_cpumask_var_node V2
  • From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/1] cpumask: add alloc_cpumask_var_node
  • From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/1] cpumask: add alloc_cpumask_var_node
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH 1/1] cpumask: add alloc_cpumask_var_node
  • From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] mtd: fix nandsim sched.h references
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] mtd: fix nettel printk formats
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] mtd: fix m25p80 printk formats
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• [PATCH -next] mtd: fix dataflash printk formats
  • From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 15 (MTD)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 12 (netdev ops)
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 15 (netlabel)
  • From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@xxxxxx>
• Re: next-20081215: kernel BUG at block/cfq-iosched.c:1243
  • From: "Alexander Beregalov" <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20081215: kernel BUG at block/cfq-iosched.c:1243
  • From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20081215: kernel BUG at block/cfq-iosched.c:1243
  • From: "Alexander Beregalov" <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 15 (mfd)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 15 (netlabel)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20081215: kernel BUG at block/cfq-iosched.c:1243
  • From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
  • From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20081215: kernel BUG at block/cfq-iosched.c:1243
  • From: "Alexander Beregalov" <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-20081215: kernel BUG at block/cfq-iosched.c:1243
  • From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
• next-20081215: kernel BUG at block/cfq-iosched.c:1243
  • From: "Alexander Beregalov" <a.beregalov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
  • From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: Tree for December 15
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: spaseirq tree build warning
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: scsi tree build failure
  • From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: scsi tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: tree build warning
  • From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: tree build warning
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the boot-params tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the boot-params tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the boot-params tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the boot-params tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: boot-params tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: sound tree build failure
  • From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the block tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree
  • From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: sparseirq tree build warning
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the rr_cpumask tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: sound tree build failure
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the sound tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mtd tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the net tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree
  • From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 12 (drm)
  • From: Jesse Barnes <jesse.barnes@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 11
  • From: "Alexey Zaytsev" <alexey.zaytsev@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: linux-next: Tree for December 12 (netdev ops)
  • From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: next-2008120[3,4] drm oops (was Re: vanilla kernels hang randomly under Fedora 10 on system with Radeon card)
  • From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [PATCH 1/1] cpumask: force nr_cpumask_bit to NR_CPUS for CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n
  • From: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>