* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Ingo, > > On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 10:14:56 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > this has been fixed already a few days ago (if you google for the build > > failure string it will send you straight to the fix patch) - i just didnt > > push it out to the -next branches yet during the hollidays. (did that now) > > Thanks. > > > Generally if you see a problem with our trees you can check whether an > > issue is still present in tip/master: > > > > http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README > > I'll try to remember ... > > [I wish you had stopped there] > > > before duplicating fixing effort and reporting it as a genuine issue - > > It broke a linux-next build - just how genuine does an issue have to be? as genuine i mean 'new, unknown issue' - not an issue that has been reported to lkml already by testers and has been fixed already. The thing is, i wouldnt have said that had you not said: > > [...] A bit more care, please. i can do without such suggestions in the merge window really - it looked rather condescending to me. A lkml search or a trivial google for the build failure pattern would have given you a working patch. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
