Rusty Russell wrote: > On Monday 05 January 2009 23:17:45 Ingo Molnar wrote: >> That would allow Mike, Christoph and you to work this out cleanly from >> scratch. It would also solve your merge conflict. >> >> Does that sound like a good solution? > > Sure, but it won't make this window. I guess since those patches don't > do anything but lay groundwork it's not critical, but annoying they've > lain fallow so long. > > I'm happy to put them with the cpualloc patches, since they're related > and going to conflict, but I still want to see if Mike has the rest of them? I do. And really, as soon as the cpus4096 is safely set for 2.6.29 I can devote much more time on it. Thanks, Mike > > Thanks, > Rusty. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
